Can Trainings on Women's Voice and Agency Raise Women's Aspirations, Entrepreneurial Activities, and Well-being? Evidence From Rural Nigeria

Last registered on July 03, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Can Trainings on Women's Voice and Agency Raise Women's Aspirations, Entrepreneurial Activities, and Well-being? Evidence From Rural Nigeria
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0011695
Initial registration date
August 02, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
August 10, 2023, 12:59 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
July 03, 2024, 12:30 PM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
IFPRI

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
IFPRI
PI Affiliation
University of California, Berkeley

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2023-05-29
End date
2024-03-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Do training interventions designed to strengthen women’s individual and collective efficacy and political participation influence their economic behaviors and outcomes--specifically, their aspirations, entrepreneurial activities, and well-being? What, if any, additive effects do training interventions intended to improve husbands' allyship in women's empowerment and gender equality play? We will answer these questions with a randomized control trial to be implemented in 450 communities (i.e., wards) across three southwestern states of Nigeria (Ogun, Osun, and Oyo) in 2023. In both treatment and control communities, we will recruit previously unaffiliated women to join women’s action committees (WACs) to be trained by ActionAid Nigeria: 1/3 of WACs (control group) will receive basic training in civic education; 1/3 (treatment group 1) will receive civic education training in addition to intensive training in advocacy, leadership, and organizing; and 1/3 (treatment group 2) will receive the same trainings as treatment group 1 and their husbands will be invited to participate in a parallel men's training focused on men's allyship in women's empowerment and gender equality. In addition to their effects on economic behaviors and outcomes, we will also examine potential mechanisms explaining these effects, by considering the effects of treatment on measures of women's beliefs in self- and group efficacy; women's locus of control; women's self-esteem; women's trust levels; women's perceptions of the cause of poverty; women’s own gender norms about views on appropriate roles for women; and intra-household bargaining power between husbands and wives over economic decision-making. If we secure additional funding, we will also assess whether husbands’ gender norms about appropriate roles for women; husbands’ supportive actions to facilitate women’s activities outside the home; husband's beliefs that supporting women's participation is socially normative; and recognition that men have an important role to play in supporting women's participation are mechanisms.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Kosec, Katrina, Jordan Kyle and Cecilia Mo. 2024. "Can Trainings on Women's Voice and Agency Raise Women's Aspirations, Entrepreneurial Activities, and Well-being? Evidence From Rural Nigeria." AEA RCT Registry. July 03. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.11695-2.0
Sponsors & Partners

Sponsors

Partner

Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
In both treatment and control communities, we will recruit previously unaffiliated women to join women’s action committees (WACs) to be trained by ActionAid Nigeria: 1/3 of WACs (control group) will receive basic training in civic education; 1/3 (treatment group 1, or T1) will receive civic education training in addition to intensive training in advocacy, leadership, and organizing (intended to help them understand the grievances they have in common; increase their shared identify as women; identify common needs and goals; understand the benefits of coordinated action; learn about local decision-making processes; identify points of influence; communicate effectively with decision-makers; and discuss feasible changes in the local context); and 1/3 (treatment group 2, or T2) will receive the same trainings as T1 and their husbands will be invited to participate in a parallel men's training focused on men's allyship in women's empowerment and gender equality (conferring an understanding of gender concepts; highlighting the importance of women's rights to societal development and the role and contribution of women in society; and underscoring the ways in which men can support women).

The intervention will begin with an initial "burn-in" meeting, identical in content and length (just over 3 hours) across all study communities (T1, T2, and control). The burn-in meeting will be used to finalize the study's experimental sample and deliver basic civil education and political information in a uni-directional way (i.e., not through engaging group activities). By making all study participants (including the control group) attend this meeting and indicate interest in receiving similar length trainings over the next 5 months, we weed out from the study individuals who are not interested in trainings or who may be generally unable to attend trainings outside of their homes for other reasons and thus increase the likelihood that our control group is comparable to our T1 and T2 groups.

Burn-in meetings will be used to screen women (prior to delivery of training information) to ensure they meet study participation criteria and to gather contact information for follow-up surveys and details on the size of the WAC (envisioned to be 13 in all cases, but we anticipate some small variance). Burn-in meetings will also inform participants that they may be invited to attend future WAC meetings in their community.

Specifically, the burn-in meeting will provide information that is often necessary in order to participate in communities: background on the national identity of Nigerians (flag, coat of arms, national anthem and prayer, and how to promote national identity); the Nigerian constitution; participation opportunities (e.g., locations and periodicity/ timing of community meetings); and the identities of local leaders, as well as their responsibilities and contact information; government structures at different levels and how policy processes operate.

Women's trainings in T1 and T2 will be administered via five facilitated group meetings, where each meeting will be just over 3 hours, following the burn-in meeting by co-gender and co-ethnic (i.e., a woman of the same ethnicity) facilitators. Facilitators will be recruited from geographically proximate communities to the study site to ensure that in addition to being fluent in both Yoruba and English, they are familiar with local dialects and comfortable working closely with rural communities. In general, facilitators will be teachers, social workers, health workers, and other professionals already living and working in the area. Women's empowerment can be a sensitive topic in rural areas with conservative gender norms, and ensuring that the facilitators can draw from relevant and contextually-specific examples and can become trusted participants in challenging conversations is essential to the success of the treatment.

To increase women’s sense of self- and group-efficacy through WACs, the trainings are intended to confer women participants with leadership and advocacy skills as well as a strong group identity with other members of their WAC whom they could rely on for support or work with to plan economic or community development endeavors to improve their circumstances.

The five treatment meetings will be organized around discussion-based and experiential learning activities, alongside a series of take-home assignments to connect each meeting and encourage participants to continue thinking about the contents of the sessions in between meetings. This homework will further be discussed at the start of the subsequent meeting, offering women a chance to share and jointly reflect on training content.

Men's trainings (T2 only) will underscore that women's empowerment is not a zero-sum game, and that it can benefit families as well as the quality of communities and policies. They will also educate men on how to effectively support women's empowerment. Women in WACs assigned to T2 will receive the same five facilitated additional WAC meetings (following the burn-in meeting) described for T1, but they will additionally have their husbands be offered a men's training, which is also comprised of five meetings of just over 3 hours each. As with T1, the facilitators will be co-ethnic and co-gender. As with the women's trainings, the five treatment meetings will be organized around discussion-based and experiential learning activities, alongside a series of take-home assignments to connect each meeting and encourage participants to continue thinking about the contents of the sessions in between meetings. Note, however, that no husbands will be invited to attend the burn-in meetings.

Additional details on the intervention can be found in the attached analysis plan.
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2023-08-05
Intervention End Date
2023-12-15

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Measures of 1) economic aspirations; 2) economic activities; and 3) economic well-being are our outcomes of interest in this experiment.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Details on how we measure each of these three categories of outcomes noted as our primary outcomes can be found in the "Concepts and measures" section of the attached analysis plan.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Our secondary outcomes are as follows: 1) efficacy beliefs; 2) locus of control; 3) self-esteem; 4) trust; 5) perceptions of the determinants of poverty; 6) perceptions of gender norms (both among men and women); 7) men's supportive actions to enable women; and 8: men's time use.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Details on how we measure each of these secondary outcomes can be found in the "Concepts and measures" section of the attached analysis plan.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study will test whether training interventions designed to strengthen women’s individual and collective efficacy and political participation influence their economic behaviors and outcomes---specifically, their aspirations, entrepreneurial activities, and well-being. It will further examine what, if any, are the additive effects of training interventions intended to improve husbands' allyship in women's empowerment and gender equality. We will answer these questions with a randomized control trial to be implemented in 450 communities (i.e., wards) across three southwestern states of Nigeria (Ogun, Osun, and Oyo) in 2023. In both treatment and control communities, we will recruit previously unaffiliated women to join women’s action committees (WACs) to be trained by ActionAid Nigeria: 1/3 of WACs (control group) will receive basic training in civic education; 1/3 (treatment group 1) will receive civic education training in addition to intensive training in advocacy, leadership, and organizing (intended to help them understand the grievances they have in common; increase their shared identify as women; identify common needs and goals; understand the benefits of coordinated action; learn about local decision-making processes; identify points of influence; communicate effectively with decision-makers; and discuss feasible changes in the local context); and 1/3 (treatment group 2) will receive the same trainings as treatment group 1 and their husbands will be invited to participate in a parallel men's training focused on men's allyship in women's empowerment and gender equality (conferring an understanding of gender concepts; highlighting the importance of women's rights to societal development and the role and contribution of women in society; and underscoring the ways in which men can support women).
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
We will randomize the 450 rural wards into control, T1, or T2 after all of the burn-in meetings as well as our baseline survey of women take place. Data collected from the supervisor survey of community characteristics conducted by the survey firm along with the size of the WACs created (based on burn-in attendance information collected by AAN) will be used to create blocks for randomization. The data that will be used for block randomization will be the following, where point of collection is indicated for each:

• Size of the WACs (collected at burn-in meeting based on total attendance by women)
• Presence of an Electricity Grid (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Are the following services present in the community area? Electricity grid that most houses can access (Y/N)")
• Presence of a Sewage System (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Are the following services present in the community area? Sewage system that most houses can access" (Y/N)")
• Presence of Mobile Phone Service (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Are the following services present in the community area? Mobile Phone Service" (Y/N)")
• Presence of a Borehole/Tube Well (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Are the following services present in the community area? Borehole or Tubewell" (Y/N)")
• Presence of Post Office (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Are the following services present in the community area or in easy walking distance? Post Office" (Y/N)")
• Presence of a School (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Are the following services present in the community area or in easy walking distance? School (public or private or both)" (Y/N)")
• Presence of a Police Station (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Are the following services present in the community area or in easy walking distance? Police Station" (Y/N)")
• Presence of a Health Clinic (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Are the following services present in the community area or in easy walking distance? Health Clinic (private or public or both" (Y/N)")
• Presence of Market Stalls (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Are the following services present in the community area or in easy walking distance? Market Stalls (selling groceries and/or clothing" (Y/N)")
• Presence of a Bank (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Are the following services present in the community area or in easy walking distance? Bank, money transfer point, mobile banking services or ATM" (Y/N)")
• Presence of a Means of Transportation (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Are the following services present in the community area or in easy walking distance? Is there any kind of paid transport such as bus, taxi, moped, or other form, available on a daily basis" (Y/N)")
• Presence of Police Road Blocks (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``In the community, did you (or any of your colleagues) see any roadblocks set up by the police or army? (Y/N)")
• Presence of Customs (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``In the community, did you (or any of your colleagues) see any customs checkpoints? (Y/N)")
• Presence of Private Road Blocks (from the Supervisor Survey question: In the community, did you (or any of your colleagues) see any roadblocks or booms set up by private security providers or by the loca community? (Y/N)")
• Road Conditions (from the Supervisor Survey question: ``Thinking of the journey here: What was the condition of the road in the last 5 kilometers before reaching the start point of the community? Was the road in excellent or good condition and easy to traverse, or was it in poor or very poor condition, that is, difficult to traverse due to potholes, waterlogging, or other issues, or was it impassable at any point (e.g., due to a collapsed bridge, fallen tree, flooding, etc.)? (Impassable, Very Poor, Poor, Fair, Good, Very Good)")
Randomization Unit
Community (i.e., ward). There are multiple communities in each ward, but we randomly selected one community per ward for inclusion in the study, and then randomized at the community level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
450 communities
Sample size: planned number of observations
Maximum 5,850 women and their husbands (this assume our implementing partner is able to obtain 13 women per community; it is possible that in some communities, the number recruited is smaller)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
150 communities and 1,950 women control, 150 communities and 1,950 women T1 (women's trainings), 150 communities and 1,950 women T2 (women's trainings and men's trainings)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Details on our power calculations can be found in the "sample size" section of the attached analysis plan.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Committee for Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS), University of California, Berkeley
IRB Approval Date
2023-02-23
IRB Approval Number
2022-08-15565
IRB Name
International Food Policy Research Institute
IRB Approval Date
2023-02-20
IRB Approval Number
Reliance Agreement, FWA #: FWA00005121
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Nigeria Pre-Analysis Plan

MD5: 244c6bbf42fb2541011a21d723e8b34d

SHA1: e90b5f8e5407527787e19e9e5c88a7329616dd22

Uploaded At: August 02, 2023

Nigeria Pre-Analysis Plan Amendment (Prior to Analysis)

MD5: 16c78ac03b98970c026b0f17b92225ea

SHA1: 44ae45278f2f050df00a8d1e6b9f8913868b3e3e

Uploaded At: July 03, 2024

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials