Improving results reporting in research

Last registered on November 21, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Improving results reporting in research
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0011976
Initial registration date
October 10, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 30, 2023, 11:08 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
November 21, 2023, 3:42 PM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
J-PAL/MIT
PI Affiliation
Cornell University
PI Affiliation
J-PAL/MIT

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2023-10-03
End date
2024-01-02
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study tests the effectiveness of two types of nudges, one involving increased salience of missing information and the other involving incentives, at improving the reporting of research results. More information can be found in the attached PAP and (currently embargoed) intervention and experimental details fields.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Cavanagh, Jack et al. 2023. "Improving results reporting in research." AEA RCT Registry. November 21. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.11976-1.1
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2023-10-11
Intervention End Date
2023-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
First-stage outcomes:
- Email open rate
- Page visit rate

Primary outcome:
- Index of research results reported (described in more detail in attached PAP)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The experiment is clustered at the study-level, but interventions will be at the individual-study pair level. All studies are randomized into one of three arms: two treatments and a control. More details on the experiment can be found in the embargoed experimental design field and the attached PAP.
Experimental Design Details
This study will test the effectiveness of two types of nudges, "salience of missing information" and a lottery, at prompting collaborators to update the post-trial fields on their registration. The treatments are randomized at the trial entry level, and each individual in the sample will receive one set of emails (initial and, if needed, follow-up) per registration for which they are listed as a "collaborator", with the email content varying depending on whether the registration has been assigned to control, treatment 1, or treatment 2. As individuals on multiple trials will receive multiple emails and, most likely, multiple treatments, we will test both spillovers and dosage effects by including terms in our main specification for counts of control, treatment 1, and treatment 2 emails received per trial, as well as the number of collaborators on a trial.

Randomization is stratified by a categorical variable with three values: 1) “single trial PIs”: trials where no collaborator is listed on any other trial; 2) “multi-trial PIs”: trials where at least one collaborator is on at least one other trial, but no collaborators are on five or more other trials; and 3) “many-trial PIs”: trials where at least one collaborator is on at least five other trials.

Within the strata the randomization probability is set to weight all three arms evenly so as to produce three arms per stratum with near-equal numbers of trial entries.

We start with all collaborators on all trials listed on the AEA RCT Registry. We then apply 4 ex-ante sample restrictions. Specifically, the trials must:

- Be at least one year post the listed trial end date as of the sample extraction date
- Have some empty post-trial fields, with the set of relevant fields described in the pre-analysis plan
- Not have any collaborators who meet any of the following “centrality”-related criteria:
- be listed on >=20 registry entries
- be a collaborator on trials with >=20 other collaborators

Collaborators on trials that meet the following criteria will still receive treatment, but we will
exclude them from the main analysis:
- Any collaborator on the trial was in the 63-person sample for our associated qualitative survey of registry users
Randomization Method
Done by a computer (in R)
Randomization Unit
Research study level
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
4,717 studies.
Sample size: planned number of observations
6,312 study-author pairs
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Approximately 1,572 studies (clusters) per each of the three treatment arms
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
MIT COUHES
IRB Approval Date
2022-01-01
IRB Approval Number
N/A
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials