Evaluating Parenting Home Visiting Program and Unconditional Cash Transfer in Thailand

Last registered on December 06, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Evaluating Parenting Home Visiting Program and Unconditional Cash Transfer in Thailand
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0012619
Initial registration date
November 30, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 06, 2023, 8:21 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Research Institute for Policy Evaluation and Design

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2022-10-01
End date
2024-01-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This project aims to promote effective parenting practices through the Jamaica Home Visiting program (Reach Up), and compare the effect with a monetary transfer.

This project will be implemented in 6 areas across the country, including Chiang Mai in the north, Khon Kean in the northeast, Mahasarakham and Kalasin in the northeast, Lop Buri in the central, Nakhon Nayok in the central, and Pattaluk and Songkla in the south. Note that the northeast is the poorest region while the south is where a significant fraction of the population is Muslim.

In each area, we will choose 12-15 subdistricts, each consisting of several villages. Each subdistrict has at least one childcare center, which usually consists of two levels of classes: (1) class of younger children (2-3 years of age at the beginning of the academic year, 16th of May) and (2) class of older children (4-3 years of age). Since the Reach Up program applies to children no older than 4 years old, we randomly chose our sample from the younger class only (except childcare centers with only mixed-age classrooms).

The randomization unit is a subdistrict. We will first rank subdistricts by the number of potential samples in the subdistrict and then form groups of three based on the ranking. We randomly assigned each group to the control and two treatment groups.

Research questions include: (i) Can the Jamaica Home Visiting program (Reach Up) improve child skills; (ii) can the Jamaica Home Visiting program (Reach Up) improve parenting quality/investment; (iii) can the monetary transfer improve child skills; (iv) can the monetary transfer increase parental investment.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Kilenthong, Weerachart. 2023. "Evaluating Parenting Home Visiting Program and Unconditional Cash Transfer in Thailand." AEA RCT Registry. December 06. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.12619-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The main intervention in this project is the Jamaican Home Visiting program, so-called Reach Up (Grantham-McGregor et al., 1991). This program aims to facilitate developmentally appropriate learning activities between mothers (primary caregivers) and
their children by demonstrating play activities centered around daily routines. Most of picture books, naming plates, conversation scenes, puzzles, lotteries, and blocks were prepared by the project, which is different from the original Reach Up program, where most of them were drawn on resources in the home. Materials for the stimulation component were adapted from the Jamaican intervention
to fit with the local cultural context and to the average educational level of home visitors and
program beneficiaries.

Play activities followed steps aimed towards children’s gradual mastery
of a learning objective: (1) child observes the play activity (modeling), (2) mother and child
do the activity together, (3) child attempts the play activity on his/her own, (4) mother
prompts naming and verbalization of objects and actions linked to the play activity, (5) the
developmental level of the play activity is adjusted by increasing or decreasing the challenge
based on the child’s performance (scaffolding). Throughout the play activities, mothers are
encouraged to provide children with contingent positive reinforcement for progress toward
the learning goals (praise) and to follow the child’s interest.

Similar to the Colombian project (Attanasio et al., 2020), this project recruited local volunteers as home visitors. Home visits were on a weekly basis and lasted approximately one hour. About 40% of children had a primary caregiver who was not a biological parent. This is similar to the situation in the China Reach project (Heckman et al., 2020). This is a unique challenge for East Asian countries. So, home visits took place with the child and his/her primary caregiver, who may not be a biological parent.
Intervention Start Date
2022-12-01
Intervention End Date
2023-10-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Child development measuring by DENVER II and Picture Memory test: this part is also a direct assessment. It is similar to digit span memory and is taken from the Wechsler Preschool & Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI), both of which will be assessed at both baseline and endline surveys.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1. Socio-emotional skills based on Strengths and Difficulty Questionnaire (SDQ).
2. Parental investment including activity time and learning materials.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We employ a clustered randomized controlled trial technique to measure the impact of the intervention. We will randomly select subdistricts in each area into a control group and two treatment groups:
1. Control (C): receive no intervention
2. Treatment 1 (T1): receive the Jamaican Home Visiting program (Reach Up).
3. Treatment 2 (T2): receive a monetary transfer of 4,000 Baht (about 111 USD)

This project will be implemented in 6 areas across the countries, including Chiang Mai in the north (purple), Khon Kean in the northeast (orange), Mahasarakham and Kalasin in the northeast (green), Lop Buri in the central (red), Nakhon Nayok in the central (yellow), and Pattaluk and Songkla in the south (blue). See the figure below. Note that the northeast is the poorest region while the south is where a significant fraction of the population is Muslim.

In each area, we will choose 12-15 subdistricts, each of which consists of several villages. Each subdistrict has at least one childcare center, which usually consists of two levels of classes: (1) class of younger children (2-3 years of age at the beginning of the academic year, 16th of May) and (2) class of older children (4-3 years of age).

The randomization unit is a subdistrict. We will first rank subdistricts by the number of potential samples in the subdistrict and then form groups of three based on the ranking. We randomly assigned each group to the control and two treatment groups.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization was done in the office using MS Excel.
Randomization Unit
Subdistricts
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
81 subdistricts
Sample size: planned number of observations
About 1,400 children
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
There are 27 subdistricts for each arm
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
This calculation has been completed before the baseline survey. We therefore assume that each subdistrict should have roughly 20 children. We also assume that the intra-correlation coefficient is 0.05 and control variables would lead to an R-square of 0.15. The targeted significance level is 0.05. We expect an effect size of about 0.25 SD. The power calculation (using the OD program with the targeted power of 0.80) suggested that each arm should have at least 24 subdistricts.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of the Thai Chamber of Commerece
IRB Approval Date
2022-08-29
IRB Approval Number
A03014/2565
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials