Going All In: Simultaneously Breaking Down Barriers for Women in the STEM Workforce

Last registered on March 27, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Going All In: Simultaneously Breaking Down Barriers for Women in the STEM Workforce
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0012934
Initial registration date
February 01, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
February 02, 2024, 4:29 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
March 27, 2026, 5:50 PM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Columbia University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Harvard University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-01-01
End date
2026-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This RCT aims to measure the impact of a 24-month STEM training initiative designed for first-generation women engineering students in India. Deployed nationwide by an Indian education start-up, the program employs a holistic strategy to overcome multifaceted barriers faced by women in STEM fields. By fostering a women-only environment, providing online accessibility, and emphasizing self-directed learning, the initiative seeks to address institutional, and psychological challenges hindering women's success in STEM. This study will evaluate two cohorts of the program: 2024-2026 and 2025-2027. The study, spanning 2023-2028, aims to evaluate the WE program's efficacy in enhancing participants' technical and higher-order skills, ultimately influencing their labor market outcomes once these women graduate college. The study will be conducted in India. The data collection will predominately be online.

Update: the program for Cohort 2 has been put on hold.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Bhuradia, Ashutosh and Saloni Gupta. 2026. "Going All In: Simultaneously Breaking Down Barriers for Women in the STEM Workforce." AEA RCT Registry. March 27. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.12934-2.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention is a 24-month online learning experiential program in India implemented by an Indian Ed-tech start-up. It aims to select, train, and nurture first-year disadvantaged women in STEM for top engineering jobs. Selected participants receive a 100% scholarship covering the entire program fee, along with a US$1200 one-time stipend for students to cover their expenses. The program typically starts in March every year, and the final selected students are announced in Feb every year. Applicants and program participants are engineering students who are in the first year of their degrees. This program has been in operation for 4 years. This study will evaluate two new cohorts of the program: 2024-2026 and 2025-2027. The study, spanning 2023-2028, aims to evaluate the WE program's efficacy in enhancing participants' technical and higher-order skills, ultimately influencing their labor market outcomes once these women graduate college.
Intervention Start Date
2024-01-01
Intervention End Date
2026-08-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
(1) Data analysis skills, measured via a screen-recorded coding assessment with trained rater evaluations; (2) Teamwork and collaboration, measured via survey-based workplace scenarios; (3) Career aspirations and orientation, measured via survey responses about post-college plans and career path preferences; (4) Professional development and labor market readiness, measured via LinkedIn profile data.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Primary outcomes are organized into four pre-specified families. Family 1 (Data Analysis Skills): a summary composite index of data analysis competency constructed from trained rater evaluations of screen-recorded coding sessions, capturing ability to structure analytical tasks, work iteratively with data, exercise independent judgment, and communicate findings. Family 2 (Teamwork): measures of teamwork orientation and collaborative decision-making from survey responses to workplace scenarios, capturing whether the program shifts participants toward team-efficient versus self-reliant behaviors. Family 3 (Career Aspirations): measures of career plans and preferences from survey responses about post-college plans and career path rankings, capturing STEM orientation, role preferences, and willingness to pursue high-growth trajectories. Family 4 (LinkedIn): measures of professional development and labor market readiness from LinkedIn profile data, capturing investment in professional identity, signaling of technical competencies, and professional network development.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Whether participants have a LinkedIn profile; marriage expectations and timing; secondary career plans; process measures from the coding assessment.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary outcomes include: whether participants report having a LinkedIn account, certainty and preferred timing of marriage, secondary career plans, and coding assessment process measures (including skill ratings, patterns of AI tool usage, and time allocation across tasks).

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We evaluate the sixth cohort (2024–2026) of a national online training program for women engineers in India. The program is highly oversubscribed, with the number of students reaching the final selection stage being double the program's intake. We leverage this oversubscription to implement a randomized evaluation. After baseline surveys and skill assessments, 450 applicants from the final round were randomly assigned to treatment (N=225, selected into the program) and control (N=225, not selected). Endline data collection is scheduled for March–June 2026 and includes an online survey (~15 min), an individual coding assessment with screen recording (~45 min), and LinkedIn profile data.

Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done by researchers using statistical software
Randomization Unit
Individual Student
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
450 individuals (not clustered)
Sample size: planned number of observations
450 students
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
225 students treatment (selected into the program), 225 students control (not selected)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
With 225 students per arm (N=450), 80% power, and a 5% significance level, the MDE without controls is 0.26 SD. Baseline measures include coding ability, technical score, aptitude score, English proficiency, IQ (Raven's Progressive Matrices), EQ (Reading the Mind in the Eyes), confidence, and Big Five personality traits. Accounting for an 85% response rate and baseline controls (estimated R² of 0.30–0.40 for skill-based outcomes using lagged measures), the MDE is approximately 0.22–0.23 SD for coding assessment outcomes and 0.25 SD for survey-based outcomes.
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Teachers College, Columbia University
IRB Approval Date
2023-12-21
IRB Approval Number
24-119
IRB Name
DAi Advisory
IRB Approval Date
2024-01-30
IRB Approval Number
N/A
IRB Name
Brown University
IRB Approval Date
2026-02-17
IRB Approval Number
STUDY00001038
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information