Impact of an intervention for senior high-schoolers aiming to facilitate access to information on higher education and student life, to enable them to make informed career choices in France

Last registered on July 23, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Impact of an intervention for senior high-schoolers aiming to facilitate access to information on higher education and student life, to enable them to make informed career choices in France
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013613
Initial registration date
July 17, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 17, 2024, 2:17 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
July 23, 2024, 5:57 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Université Paris Dauphine

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Université Paris Dauphine-PSL
PI Affiliation
CNRS, Université Paris Dauphine
PI Affiliation
ENS-PSL

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2023-09-03
End date
2030-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Despite the massification of higher education in France over recent decades, inequalities in access to higher education persist. Access rates to higher education vary widely according to parental income (Bonneau and Grobon, 2021). Moreover, when enrolled in higher education, students attend different types of courses depending on their social background (Bechichi et al., 2021). This raises questions of both efficiency and equity, as both the private and public benefits of higher education can be substantial (Fack and Huillery, 2021).

The first reason put forward to explain these inequalities in access is the difference in school results according to social origin. However, beyond this explanation, other factors have been put forward. In particular, socially disadvantaged students' lack of information and self-confidence can influence their aspirations (Guyon and Huillery, 2021; Terrier et al., 2023). The “Vers le Sup'” program, developed by the Article 1 NGO, aims to address these very factors.

The research protocol aims to observe the effects of the “Vers le Sup'” program on students' aspirations and self-confidence, as well as on their progress in higher education and professional integration.

Approved by the French Ministry of Education, the Article 1 NGO is rolling out “Vers le Sup'”, a program designed to help high-school students make the right career choices, accredited by the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research.

Article 1’s interventions include three modules:
- The inspire-orientation.org platform. This is an entirely free website for career guidance. It helps high school students plan their post-baccalaureate careers by providing information on study paths, in line with their results and interests. In addition, a network of student volunteers can be mobilised to answer students' more specific questions about the courses of study they are considering. Registration on this site takes place during the workshop.
- The “Se projeter vers le Sup'” workshop. This is a two-hour in-class workshop, led by student volunteers, to provide students with information on career guidance and to help them project themselves into higher education and student life.
- Mentorat Vers le Sup', a personalised support scheme, enabling general and technological high school seniors who wish to benefit from the support of a student mentor to help them in the transition between the end of high school (from January) and entry into higher education (until December).

There will be two types of interventions, I1 and I2:
I1: Year 12 students benefit from the “Se projeter vers le Sup'” workshop and have access to the inspire-orientation.org platform.
I2: Year 12 students benefit from the interventions proposed in I1. In addition, individual mentoring is offered to volunteer students.

The comparison between these two types of interventions will enable us to measure the additional benefit of offering mentoring to students, compared with the I1 intervention. Impacts will be measured by comparing the same indicators for all students (control, I1, I2). Our first aim is to establish the impact of the interventions on outcomes collected at the end of the senior high-school year (knowledge of higher education, self-confidence aspirations) and beyond (highest diploma, match between students’ initial aspirations and their diploma, number of years spent to obtain their diploma and professional integration).

Registration Citation

Citation
Chevallier, Coralie et al. 2024. "Impact of an intervention for senior high-schoolers aiming to facilitate access to information on higher education and student life, to enable them to make informed career choices in France." AEA RCT Registry. July 23. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13613-2.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Article 1’s interventions include three modules:
The inspire-orientation.org platform. This is an entirely free website for career guidance. It helps high school students plan their post-baccalaureate careers by providing information on study paths, in line with their results and interests. In addition, a network of student volunteers can be mobilised to answer students' more specific questions about the courses of study they are considering. Registration on this site takes place during the workshop.
The “Se projeter vers le Sup'” workshop. This is a two-hour in-class workshop, led by student volunteers, to provide students with information on career guidance and to help them project themselves into higher education and student life.
Mentorat Vers le Sup', a personalised support scheme, enabling general and technological high school seniors who wish to benefit from the support of a student mentor to help them in the transition between the end of high school (from January) and entry into higher education (until December).
Intervention Start Date
2023-09-03
Intervention End Date
2026-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Knowledge about careers and higher education
Knowledge about financial aid
Perceived self-efficacy (i.e., self-assessment of chances of success in higher education)
Expected sense of belonging
Degree of peers influence on higher education choices
Degree of family influence on higher education choices
Degree of certainty with respect to career choices
Average prestige of students’ wishes in Parcoursup, prestige being measured by the average baccalauréat grade of students enrolled in a given track at the national level
Average prestige of students’ top 3 wishes in Parcoursup
Prestige of students’ final choice in higher education, i.e., the track students get enrolled in (prestige being measured by the average baccalauréat grade of students enrolled in a given track at the national level)
Indicator of whether students passed the exams each year in higher education
Indicator of whether students dropped out higher education
Number of time students repeated a year in higher education
Number of time students changed their track in higher education
Prestige of students’ final educational attainment, prestige being measured by the average baccalauréat grade of students who attain this level of education at the national level.
Time in employment during the first year after higher education
Labour income during the first year after higher education
International Socioeconomic Index (ISEI) of occupations during the first year after higher education
Social transfers during the first year after higher education
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design

The evaluation protocol is based on a randomised controlled trial with 3 arms: I1, I2 and a control group in which no intervention is delivered. 58 high schools are included over three school years (2023-2024, 2024-2025, and 2025-2026). Randomization takes place at the cohort*high school level. In each high school, cohorts are randomised to one of three groups, as summarised in Table 1 :
In Group A, the 2023-2024 cohort of Year-12 students receives the I2 intervention, the 2024-2025 cohort receives no intervention and the 2025-2026 cohort receives the I1 intervention.
In Group B, the 2023-2024 cohort of Year-12 students receive the I1 intervention, the 2024-2025 cohort receives the I2 intervention and the 2025-2026 cohort receives no intervention.
In Group C, the 2023-2024 cohort of Year-12 students receives no intervention, the 2024-2025 cohort receives the I1 intervention and the 2025-2026 cohort receives the I2 intervention.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
The randomization is done by the research team using STATA.
Randomization Unit
Randomization takes place at the cohort*high school level. We stratified on high school characteristics. We constructed strata with three schools with smallest distance in baseline characteristics and then we randomised within each stratum the three schools into the three experimental arms.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
The treatment is clustered at the cohort*school-level, so we have 174 clusters.
Sample size: planned number of observations
In each high school, one to four classes of year-12 students are included, with an average of 3 classes per high school. A total of 174 year-12 classes are included each year, which corresponds to a total of 522 classes over the 3-year study period. The final administrative sample will include approximately 13 050 students (25 per class). The final survey sample will include approximately 10 440 students, accounting for a 20% attrition due to absenteeism.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
In each of the 58 high schools, one cohort out of the 3-year study period belongs to each treatment arms. Therefore there are 58 clusters in each treatment arm, which represents on average 174 classes.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Given the parameters of the experimental design, the minimum detectable effect size is 0.13 standard deviation of the outcome for the I1 vs. control comparison and I2 vs. control comparison and 0.18 standard deviation of the outcome for I2 vs. I1 comparison.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Paris School of Economics
IRB Approval Date
2024-07-19
IRB Approval Number
2024-019
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information