Uptake of Best Management Practices by Rice Farmers in Nigeria: The Effectiveness of Bundling Women’s Empowerment Training, Digital Extension, and In-Person Extension

Last registered on October 19, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Uptake of Best Management Practices by Rice Farmers in Nigeria: The Effectiveness of Bundling Women’s Empowerment Training, Digital Extension, and In-Person Extension
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014585
Initial registration date
October 15, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 19, 2024, 9:42 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
The Pennsylvania State University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
AfricaRice
PI Affiliation
Northwestern University
PI Affiliation
The Pennsylvania State University
PI Affiliation
The Pennsylvania State University

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-01-15
End date
2025-07-15
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Despite the potential of digital innovations in agricultural extension to increase the uptake of best management practices in rice-based farming systems in Nigeria, a large-scale use of digital extension is not observed due to the lack of supplementary gender-differentiated in-person extension services and the absence of a gender-transformative approach in technology diffusion processes. The study aims to address the barriers inhibiting women’s adoption of innovations, digital technologies, and access to agricultural advice. The main research question is: Does bundling “women’s empowerment training, digital extension, and in-person extension” increase the adoption of improved cultural practices and use of mechanization in rice-based farming systems in Nigeria?
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Arouna, Aminou et al. 2024. "Uptake of Best Management Practices by Rice Farmers in Nigeria: The Effectiveness of Bundling Women’s Empowerment Training, Digital Extension, and In-Person Extension." AEA RCT Registry. October 19. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14585-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

Sponsors

Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
To evaluate the effectiveness of the bundle/package of women’s empowerment training, digital extension, and in-person extension on the uptake of best management practices and the performance of rice production, the trial tests variations of two interventions (women’s empowerment training and digital extension supplemented with in-person extension) leading to five experimental groups: “Provision of wives-only training about women’s empowerment and RiceAdvice Lite recommendations supplemented with bi-weekly visits of female extension agents in the rice cropping season” (T1), “Provision of wives-only training about women’s empowerment and RiceAdvice Lite recommendations supplemented with bi-weekly visits of male extension agents in the rice cropping season” (T2), “Provision of couples’ training about women’s empowerment and RiceAdvice Lite recommendations supplemented with bi-weekly visits of female extension agents in the rice cropping season” (T3), “Provision of couples’ training about women’s empowerment and RiceAdvice Lite recommendations supplemented with bi-weekly visits of male extension agents in the rice cropping season” (T4), and “No training about women’s empowerment, no RiceAdvice Lite recommendations, and no supplementary bi-weekly visits of extension agents of any gender in the rice cropping season” (C).

The interventions start with the women’s empowerment training workshops in October 2024. There are 8 one-day training workshops: 2 per state, including 1 only for wives and 1 for both wives and husbands. In polygamous households, only the wife growing rice and managing their plots is selected; if there are many such wives, one of them is randomly selected. Wives of households in the villages allocated to the “wives-only” training receive a one-day training about women’s empowerment implemented by an experienced local NGO in Nigeria. The training curriculum is administered to address five empowerment domains (production, resources, income, leadership, and time) and increase the Abbreviated Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (A-WEAI). Wives and husbands of households in the villages allocated to the “couples” training receive the same one-day training about women’s empowerment implemented by the same experienced local NGO in Nigeria. Although treated couples receive the same training curriculum as treated wives, differences in outcomes may be observed between the two bundle sub-components because the “couples” training contributes to gender-transformative intra-household changes as opposed to gender-accommodating intra-household changes.

In addition to the women’s empowerment training, households in treatment villages will receive RiceAdvice Lite recommendations and bi-weekly visits of extension agents in October and November 2024. The extension agent is female in T1 and T3 while male in T2 and T4. Extension agents facilitate the use of RiceAdvice Lite app on the plots and give any additional agricultural advice that the households may need on rice cropping practices and the use of agricultural machinery. Extension agents are local extension professionals from two NGOs, ATAFI and Green Sahel. Although the bundle component “digital extension supplemented with in-person extension” is allocated at the village level, extension agent’s gender differences in the take-up of best management practices across villages may be observed due to heterogeneous abilities in agricultural advice delivery. Besides, the interaction between the farmer’s gender and the extension agent’s gender introduces additional dynamics to be observed since female extension agents may relate well with the female farmers and deliver them agricultural advice in a better way than male extension agents do due to the gender norms in Northern Nigeria. Thus, the “female extension agent” assignment may contribute to gender-transformative intra-household changes as opposed to gender-accommodating intra-household changes.
Intervention Start Date
2024-10-21
Intervention End Date
2024-11-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The trial focuses on outcomes at two levels: farmer level (i.e., spouse level) and farmer-plot level.
Primary outcomes are either binary or continuous. Binary primary outcomes are adoption of the key improved cultural practice (smart-valley) and use of the key agricultural machinery (tractor). Continuous primary outcomes are the following aggregate outcomes:
-Count of agricultural machinery used (tractor, power tiller, mechanized transplanter, mechanized seeder, mechanized weeder, net (for bird scaring), mini combine harvester, ASI/ATA thresher, GEM parboiler, Striga management video);
-Count of improved cultural practices adopted and agricultural machinery used (mulching, smart-valley, mechanical leveling, row-sowing, row-transplanting, improved steamed parboiling, tractor, power tiller, mechanized transplanter, mechanized seeder, mechanized weeder, net (for bird scaring), mini combine harvester, ASI/ATA thresher, GEM parboiler, Striga management video);
-Abbreviated Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (A-WEAI).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary outcomes are either binary or continuous. Binary secondary outcomes are uses of non-labor inputs (improved rice varieties, inorganic fertilizer, pesticides/insecticides/herbicides), on-farm labor, and off-farm labor. Continuous secondary outcomes are the following:
-Quantity and monetary value of non-labor inputs (seeds, inorganic fertilizer, organic fertilizer, pesticides/insecticides/herbicides);
-Quantity and monetary value of on-farm labor and off-farm labor;
-Yield and value of rice output;
-% output sold and value of sales;
-Profit from rice farming.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Using local expert knowledge, we identify 3 Local Government Areas (LGAs) within each state of the corridor Jigawa-Kano-Kaduna-Nasarawa-Benue. Although there are only four study states for this trial, a pilot survey includes the state of Kano where a previous impact study (Arouna et al. 2021) was conducted. Each of the 3 LGAs has at least 4 villages with a minimum of 20 households within the village growing rice under irrigated ecology in uplands or lowlands. This yields a sample frame of 48 villages for the study (4 states * 3 LGAs per state * 4 villages per LGA).

As the villages are identified using expert knowledge, the study confirms and updates the information using local enumerator’s knowledge during the training of enumerators for the baseline data collection. In each of the 48 villages, a list of rice-growing households is obtained from the village head; the households are classified into “households mostly with male-managed rice plots” versus “households mostly with female-managed rice plots.” From this household list for the village, 20 rice-growing households are initially selected to ensure the household sample is representative of the classification into mainly male- or female-managed rice-growing households. After a baseline survey conducted in May 2024, to guard against attrition, a light phone survey outreaching baseline households was conducted in September 2024 to assess the feasibility of a planned sample size of 880 farmers based on 11 married households each in 40 villages and 2 farmers/spouses per household.

The experimental design is a multi-site (state), cluster (village) randomized trial with treatment at the village level. We will select and randomize the 40 villages into bundling treatment and control groups. In October 2024:
-20 villages will be allocated to the control group (C) receiving “no training about women’s empowerment, no RiceAdvice Lite recommendations, and no supplementary bi-weekly visits of extension agents of any gender in the rice cropping season”;
5 villages will be allocated to the treatment group (T1) receiving “wives-only training about women’s empowerment and RiceAdvice Lite recommendations supplemented with bi-weekly visits of female extension agents in the rice cropping season”;
-5 villages will be allocated to the treatment group (T2) receiving “wives-only training about women’s empowerment and RiceAdvice Lite recommendations supplemented with bi-weekly visits of male extension agents in the rice cropping season”;
-5 villages will be allocated to the treatment group (T3) receiving “couples’ training about women’s empowerment and RiceAdvice Lite recommendations supplemented with bi-weekly visits of female extension agents in the rice cropping season”;
-5 villages will be allocated to the treatment group (T4) receiving “couples’ training about women’s empowerment and RiceAdvice Lite recommendations supplemented with bi-weekly visits of male extension agents in the rice cropping season”.
Within each village assigned to the bundling treatment, the 11 married households all receive the same treatment assigned to the village.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
The randomization is done in the office on a computer using Stata.
Randomization Unit
The treatment is randomized at the village level.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
40 village clusters
Sample size: planned number of observations
440 households and 880 farmers or spouses
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
-Control group (C): 220 households and 440 farmers or spouses;
-Treatment group (T1): 55 households and 110 farmers or spouses;
-Treatment group (T2): 55 households and 110 farmers or spouses;
-Treatment group (T3): 55 households and 110 farmers or spouses;
-Treatment group (T4): 55 households and 110 farmers or spouses.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
See Power calculations in “Annex: RCT Registry” and the Excel file “Final Power Calcs”
Supporting Documents and Materials

Documents

Document Name
Annex: RCT Registry
Document Type
proposal
Document Description
File
Annex: RCT Registry

MD5: 5825d9242df09a6c2cb4b9c53b5f70dc

SHA1: 1e058e5e2114abad4cf44fb630cda71161e4bd92

Uploaded At: October 15, 2024

Document Name
Final Power Calcs
Document Type
other
Document Description
File
Final Power Calcs

MD5: fa3846807f5eb85c258ee95c21db2ff1

SHA1: 1f0af45de872f70ee8fbcf751551053a5f97f45c

Uploaded At: October 15, 2024

IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)/Institutional Review Board (IRB) office for The Pennsylvania State University, USA
IRB Approval Date
2024-02-21
IRB Approval Number
STUDY00024229