Harnessing School Meals for Education, Child Nutrition, and Social Protection in Malawi

Last registered on December 02, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Harnessing School Meals for Education, Child Nutrition, and Social Protection in Malawi
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014854
Initial registration date
November 20, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 02, 2024, 11:07 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Center for Global Development

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Center for Global Development
PI Affiliation
Center for Global Development
PI Affiliation
University of Malawi

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-03-22
End date
2027-04-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study evaluates the impact of a Home-Grown School Feeding Programme in Malawi, targeting 400,000 primary and pre-primary students across 416 schools and 120 Early Childhood Development (ECD) centers. Using a randomized controlled trial, we assess the programme's causal effects on nutritional and educational outcomes of preschool and primary school students, as well as household welfare and willingness to pay for public services. The evaluation explores pathways linking school meals to learning improvements, nutritional catch-up, and enhanced household resilience to shocks. Learning and anthropometric data will be collected on 4800 children attending 200 treatment and 200 control primary schools and 1560 children between the ages of 3-5 in the catchment areas of 78 treatment and 78 control ECD centers. Additionally, household survey data will be collected from the households of all sample children, numbering 6360 in total. Additional data will be gathered through school attendance and headteacher surveys. Results will inform policy by providing evidence on the multi-sectoral benefits of school feeding programs, addressing gaps in existing literature, and guiding future investment decisions in education and social protection.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Bedasso, Biniam et al. 2024. "Harnessing School Meals for Education, Child Nutrition, and Social Protection in Malawi." AEA RCT Registry. December 02. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14854-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention consists of the provision of one hot meal on each school day to all present children in all primary schools and ECD centers selected for the intervention. The meals are cooked on the school premises following a standard menu formulated by the World Food Programme.
Intervention Start Date
2024-05-13
Intervention End Date
2027-04-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The primary outcome variables are the following education and nutrition outcomes:
1. School attendance for primary school children
2. ECD enrollment status for children aged 3-5 years
3. Literacy score (EGRA) for primary school children
4. Numeracy score (EGMA) for primary school children
5. MDAT (early childhood development) score for children aged 3-5 years*
6. Height-for-Age Z-score for all children
7. Weight-for-Age Z-score for all children
8. BMI for for primary school children
9. Middle-Upper-Arm-Circumference for children aged 3-5 years
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
*MDAT stands for Malawi Development Assessment Tool. The score is calculated based on a series of developmental indicators for each child.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1. Household food consumption
2. Incidence of negative coping strategies against food insecurity
3. Incidence of negative coping strategies against other adverse shocks
4. Child labor
5. Willingness to pay for social services
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The trial is part of phase two of a school feeding programme that was being implemented by the World Food Programme in four districts in southern Malawi. The current phase covers four education districts in northern Malawi: Rumphi, Mzimba South, Mzimba North and Nkhata bay. The eligibility of a primary school for inclusion in the programme is determined by the implementing partner (i.e. WFP) based on the feasibility of establishing a functional school meals programme in the school. The minimum criteria applied for eligibility are listed below:
- Exclude schools providing school meals to children in the 2023/24 academic year
- Have a functional school management committee (SMC)
- Have a functional parent teachers’ association (PTA)
- Have a functional procurement committee
- Have a functional finance committee
- Have a functional water source
- Have a tree grown woodlot
- Distance to nearest farmer organisation (FO) is less than 20km

It was decided by government and the funding organization to cover 200 primary schools and 78 ECD centers in the current phase of the school feeding programme. The study includes all 200 primary schools and 78 ECD centers to maximize statistical power. The four districts were assigned specific numbers of schools as part of the programming decision. Accordingly, the distribution of treatment schools is:
- Mzimba North: 50
- Mzimba South: 65
- Rumphi: 50
- Nkhata bay: 35

The 78 treatment ECD centers are distributed between the four districts in proportion to the number of schools. Therefore, the distribution of treatment ECD centers is:
- Mzimba North: 19
- Mzimba South: 26
- Rumphi: 19
- Nkhata bay: 14

Operationally, each treatment ECD center need to be paired with a treatment primary school because the procurement of food items for ECD centers will be handed by primary schools. Therefore, the randomization processes proceeded in two stages. In the first stage, we randomly selected 200 treatment and 200 control primary schools, out of a total of 526 eligible schools, as per the predetermined allocation of schools within each district stratum. Since we did not have baseline data at the time of randomization, we formed matched quadruplets based on school level variables from administrative data such as enrolment and pupil-teacher ratio to improve the balance. In the second stage, all ECD centers within a 2km radius from a treatment or control primary school were assessed for eligibility based on a series of indicators to determine their suitability for functional school meal programme. Subsequently, 78 treatment schools were randomly selected from the list of treatment schools with at least one eligible ECD center within a 2km radius. The associated ECD centers constitute the treatment group for ECD centers. If there is more than one eligible ECD center within a 2km radius from a selected school, the center with the highest eligibility score is included. Similarly, 78 control schools were randomly selected from the list of control schools with at least one eligible ECD center within a 2km radius. The associated ECD centers form the control group for ECD centers.

All children attending treatment ECDs and primary schools receive school meals while no student in the control schools participates in any formal school feeding scheme. Therefore, 10-12 children enrolled in each treatment or control school (and their households) were randomly selected for the study. On the ECD side, 8-10 children within the catchment area of each ECD center (i.e. approx. 2km radius) were sampled. Around half of these children were already enrolled in the respective ECD center while the other half were not. Children who were not enrolled in ECD centers at the time of sampling were included because one of the objectives of the study is to measure the impact of school meals on enrollment in ECD centers.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
For both primary school and ECD-age children, the randomization unit is primary school.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
400 schools
Sample size: planned number of observations
4800 primary school pupils, 1560 ECD-age children
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Primary schools: 200 primary schools control, 200 primary schools school feeding intervention
ECD centers: 78 centers control, 78 centers school feeding intervention
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Literacy: 0.18 s.d. Numeracy: 0.14 s.d. HAZ score: <0.1 s.d.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Malawi Research Ethics Commitee
IRB Approval Date
2024-03-15
IRB Approval Number
P.03/24/333