Assessing the Prevalence of Food Safety Concerns in Informal Markets – Case of the Senegal Dairy Market

Last registered on February 23, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Assessing the Prevalence of Food Safety Concerns in Informal Markets – Case of the Senegal Dairy Market
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015089
Initial registration date
December 29, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 29, 2024, 11:21 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
February 23, 2026, 9:37 AM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Purdue University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Purdue University
PI Affiliation
Purdue University

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2024-12-27
End date
2025-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Most consumers in the developing world purchase food in informal markets, where very little enforcement of quality grades and standards exists. These informal markets are characterized by numerous small-scale traders and processors who typically operate without formal business registration, making enforcing and monitoring food safety standards difficult and expensive. Given the unobservability of many food safety attributes, actors in such informal markets have little to no incentive to invest in food safety. This gives rise to a “lemons market” in which questionable quality and safety products dominate the food system. The milk food chain in Senegal is a quintessential example of an informal market characterized by food safety concerns. The vast majority of urban and peri-urban consumers purchase sour milk from small-scale informal processors which are small, unregistered businesses that operate without a license or any food safety practices. This aspect has major food safety and health implications for the millions of consumers who purchase sour milk from these vendors. To this end, we will conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impacts of safety training on the adoption of safe handling practices and the safety level of Neex Soow producers’ sour milk. Using 360 participants, we will conduct surveys to understand Neex Soow production, business, and safety practices. We will further assess participants’ demand for safer inputs by evaluating their willingness to pay for each item using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschack auction mechanism. By offering safety training and a recognized training certification, our study introduces a mechanism for product differentiation. Neex Soow vendors who complete the training and display the certification in their shops can signal higher product quality to consumers, potentially creating a premium for safer, more hygienically prepared sour milk. We want to test if this process of quality upgrading addresses the lemons market problem by allowing informed consumers to distinguish between different products’ quality and safety. As more vendors improve their safety practices and gain certification, others in the market could be encouraged to follow to remain competitive, which could raise the average quality of the market over time, thereby reducing the prevalence of “lemons” and promoting overall market efficiency.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Kane, Diamilatou, Jonathan Bauchet and Jacob Ricker-Gilbert. 2026. "Assessing the Prevalence of Food Safety Concerns in Informal Markets – Case of the Senegal Dairy Market." AEA RCT Registry. February 23. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15089-2.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Our research aims to improve the safety levels and revenues of sour milk provided by small-scale informal processors in informal food markets by offering safety training and a recognized training certification that introduces a mechanism for product differentiation. As more vendors improve their safety practices and gain certification, others in the market could be encouraged to follow to remain competitive, which could raise the average quality of the market over time, thereby reducing the prevalence of “lemons” and promoting overall market efficiency.
To achieve this, we conduct a randomized controlled trial with 360 sour milk informal processors in urban and peri-urban neighborhoods of Dakar, Senegal. where half of our sample will receive safety training on proper handling practices and an accredited certificate of completion and the other half will receive no training.
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2025-09-01
Intervention End Date
2025-10-15

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. Safety levels of soured milk samples
2. Weekly revenue
3. Adoption of 14 safe handling practices
4. Willingness-to-pay for masks, head caps, cleaning cloths, and lactic ferments.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
1. Samples of soured milk will be collected during follow-up surveys and tested for E.coli and Enterobacteriaceae by our partner institute to determine if both levels are below the nationally accepted threshold. We will analyze both the continuous measures of contaminant levels, and create a binary safety score equal to 1 if the sample satisfies safety levels for both parameters (i.e. is safe to consume). Safety levels changes will be measured in terms of differences in microbial contamination of soured milk samples between treated processors and untreated ones.
2. Weekly revenues will be measured by assessing the differences in sales between processors in the treated group who receive training and display certification in their shop and processors in the control group.
3. In each shop, the respondent will be asked a set of questions about the shop’s fermentation processes and equipment use. Along with clean equipment and proper storage, when observable, we will create binary variables for each hygiene and safety variable recorded and construct an index where each respondent’s score will be the addition of the number of safe hygiene practices they adopt . This index will be compared between treated and control groups.
4. Willingness-to-pay for safety equipment (masks, head caps, cleaning cloths, lactic ferments) will be measured by assessing the differences in shop respondents’ willingness-to-pay for each item between treated processors and untreated ones.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1. Certificate display
2. Price changes
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
1. To assess compliance and adoption of treatment, we will assess the display of certificates between respondents assigned to receive training and those from the control group. Certificate display is an observable variable and is equal to 1 if the certificate is visibly displayed in front of the shop.
2. Price may increase if consumers recognize the higher product quality and sellers capitalize on the higher quality.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We will conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impacts of safety training on the adoption of safe handling practices and the safety level of Neex Soow producers’ sour milk. Using 360 participants, we will conduct a baseline survey to understand processors' production, business, and safety practices. Randomization was done at the neighborhood level (clustered randomized controlled trial), and stratified by commune. We will further assess participants’ demand for safer inputs such as masks, head caps, cleaning sheets, and lactic ferments by evaluating their willingness to pay for these 4 items using the Becker- DeGroot-Marschak auction mechanism. Following the baseline survey, half of the participants will receive the treatment. Research partners from the Food Technology Institute (ITA) in Senegal will design a 3-day theoretical and practical training intervention to train treated participants on proper handling practices in milk processing. We will conduct a follow-up survey 6 months after baseline surveys and collect milk samples from all 360 participants to be tested for microbial contamination by ITA.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization is done in an office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
neighborhood level
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
40 communes, 148 neighborhoods
Sample size: planned number of observations
360 soured milk processors
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
1. T (Treatment – training): 180 soured milk processors in 148 neighborhoods
2. C (Control): 180 soured milk processors in 148 neighborhoods
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Purdue University Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2024-12-11
IRB Approval Number
IRB-2024-1641

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials