Leadership in early life: Field evidence from China

Last registered on February 20, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Leadership in early life: Field evidence from China
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015392
Initial registration date
February 15, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
February 20, 2025, 5:10 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
School of Economics, HUST
PI Affiliation
School of Foreign Languages, HUST

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-02-17
End date
2025-06-26
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Sufficient human capital investment is crucial for the healthy growth of any national economy. Children accumulate knowledge, learning habits, communication ability, social skills, and leadership in school. Recent evidence has shed lights on the causal relationship between leadership and skills formation (Anderson and Lu, 2016) among those students who are intrinsically motivated to be a leader, future employers and policy makers might also be interested in the average effect of leadership education on academic performance, cognitive ability, non-cognitive ability and their social networks (eg., the number of friends or enemies, the relationship between the tutor and students). We investigate the question in a primary school in central China, with 33 classes and 2599 students covering grade 2 to 5 (8 to 11 years old). The control group adopts the conventional way to select the class leaders -- they are designated by the head teacher -- while students in the treatment group rotate to be the class leaders (class monitors, vice-monitors, Task commissaries) every two weeks. We expect the outcome variables in the treatment group to have a lower variation compared to the control group since the treatment has provided an equal access to the "leadership education".
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Fan, Hongzhong, Lihua Xia and Jin Di Zheng. 2025. "Leadership in early life: Field evidence from China ." AEA RCT Registry. February 20. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15392-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The primary intervention is the leadership election in each class.
Teachers designate leaders in the control group and students take turns to be the leaders in the treatment.
Intervention Start Date
2025-02-17
Intervention End Date
2025-06-26

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
test scores (four subjects math, Chinese, english, science), cognitive ability, social preferences, social network (number of friends), number of conflicts, evaluations from course teachers, feedbacks from the parents
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We investigate the question in a primary school in central China, with 33 classes and 2599 students covering grade 2 to 5 (8 to 11 years old). The control group adopts the conventional way to select the class leaders throughout the semester-- they are designated by the head teacher.
Students in the treatment group rotate to be the class leaders (class monitors, vice-monitors, Task commissaries) every two weeks in the upcoming semester.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
We first randomize the classes by a computer, then we check the randomization by comparing the pre-test academic scores.
Randomization Unit
individual, class, campus,
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
33 classes
Sample size: planned number of observations
2259 students (~52 in 33 clusters)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
17 classes treatment, 16 classes control.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
School of Economics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
IRB Approval Date
2024-11-18
IRB Approval Number
N/A