Empowering Elected Women Representatives in Local Democratic Institutions

Last registered on September 01, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Empowering Elected Women Representatives in Local Democratic Institutions
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015405
Initial registration date
August 26, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
September 01, 2025, 3:12 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Sheetal Sekhri, Associate Professor, University of Virginia

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-04-15
End date
2027-12-30
Secondary IDs
None
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We conduct a randomized experiment to evaluate whether training interventions can enhance the ability
of female GP members to manage flood-related challenges and improve public service delivery. This research will
provide empirical evidence on the impact of capacity-building initiatives for elected women representatives on local
governance. By assessing the effectiveness of training and resources in empowering these women, the study will
contribute to a deeper understanding of how gender dynamics influence local governance, disaster management, and climate resilience.
Additionally, we will examine any indirect spillover effects on the attitudes of male GP members, alongside the direct impact on the confidence and communication skills of female GP members. We will also assess the implications for adaptation and resilience of households.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Sekhri, Sheetal. 2025. "Empowering Elected Women Representatives in Local Democratic Institutions." AEA RCT Registry. September 01. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15405-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The treatment will provide targeted training to the women elected representatives in the treatment GPS focused on enhancing skills and knowledge related to flood management, public service delivery, and leadership. Nested treatments will also offer training to improve self-efficacy and confidence, as well as communication skills. Topics will include resource allocation, community mobilization, emergency response, and access to public provisions during and after floods.
Intervention Start Date
2024-06-01
Intervention End Date
2026-06-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
EWRs: awareness, participation in GP decision making, quality of governance, confidence, communication skills, public goods provision, and empowerment.
Community welfare and resilience to floods
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
EWR
Awareness - quiz about roles and responsibilities and resources available for flood management in GP;
Participation in GP- attendance in meetings, speaking in meetings;
Quality - roles EWRs play, services they monitor, meetings they hold in their ward and with public officials, and petitions they submit;
Confidence -generalized self-efficacy scale;
Public goods provision -mapping public goods
Empowerment- Index of decisions that EWR can make and autonomy over mobility
Community welfare - examining expenditure, food vulnerability, health (Activities of daily life and mental health related survey questions),
Adaptation and resilience- flood preparation and precautionary actions, age of marriage of girls during floods, safety, welfare outcomes listed above after floods

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
attidtudes towards gender roles of males, and females ERs;
crimes against females; improvement in bargaining power at home for EWRs, allocation of resources to children
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Attitudes - creating an index of agreement with statements about progressive norms and survey questions through vignettes
crimes- survey questions about assault, trafficking, domestic violence
bargaining power- how much of the household budget is spent on preferred goods
allocation for health, nutrition, and schooling of children

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We are conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial in Darbhanga district, Bihar, India, one of the country’s most flood-prone areas. The study tests whether leadership and capacity-building programs for elected women representatives (EWRs) in Gram Panchayats (village governments) improve governance and flood preparedness.

A total of 105 flood-vulnerable Gram Panchayats were randomly assigned to one of two groups:

Control group (35 GPs) – no intervention.

Treatment group (70 GPs) – in Year 1, all receive a three-day “boot camp” training on their roles and responsibilities, local governance, gender equity, and flood management.

After one year, the treatment group is split into two equal subgroups: one receives additional training in self-efficacy, the other in communication skills. The full intervention spans two years.

We will track changes in leadership capacity, flood preparedness, and local governance through surveys of elected representatives and households at baseline (2024), midline (2025), and endline (2026).

Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done by a computer
Randomization Unit
Gram panchayats (GPs)
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
105
Sample size: planned number of observations
approximately 2205, including elected representatives and 12 additional households
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Treatment T0: Exposure and awareness 70 GPS> T1: Training in self-efficacy 35 GPs, T2: training in communications and oral efficacy 35 GPs
Control 35 GPs
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Power calculation (MDEs). We computed MDEs for a two-sided test (α=0.05) with 80% power in a cluster-randomized design at the Gram Panchayat (GP) level, accounting for clustering. For the main comparison (any treatment vs control; 70 vs 35 GPs), assuming average cluster sizes of 12 households/GP and 9 elected representatives/GP and ICC=0.05, the MDEs are 0.208 SD (household outcomes) and 0.229 SD (elected-representative outcomes). For the Year-2 sub-arm comparison (self-efficacy vs communication; 35 vs 35 GPs), the MDEs are 0.241 SD (household) and 0.264 SD (elected representatives). For binary outcomes, we report percentage-point equivalents using Sqroot(p(1−p) ): at p=0.50, these correspond to ~10.4–13.2 pp; At p=0.30, ~9.6–12.1 pp. Primary outcomes that are indices are standardized to SD=1 by construction.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Social and Behavioral Science, UVA
IRB Approval Date
2024-12-17
IRB Approval Number
6824
IRB Name
DAI Research & Advisory Services Pvt Ltd. Human Subjects Committee
IRB Approval Date
2024-12-03
IRB Approval Number
N/A
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information