Co-production of knowledge and strategies to enhance the cyanide-safe cassava value chain in Nigeria

Last registered on June 23, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Co-production of knowledge and strategies to enhance the cyanide-safe cassava value chain in Nigeria
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016249
Initial registration date
June 21, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 23, 2025, 2:56 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Purdue University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Purdue University
PI Affiliation
Purdue University

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2025-06-09
End date
2025-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Food insecurity and low food safety are major challenges around the world, particularly so in developing countries and in sub-Saharan Africa. Cassava can contribute to reducing food insecurity, as it grows well in a variety of climates and soils, and is a staple food for millions of people worldwide. The potential of cassava to fight hunger is constrained by the presence of cyanogenic glucosides, which lead to high cyanide content in raw cassava and improperly processed cassava products. Fermenting, boiling, drying, or grinding cassava are common techniques to reduce cyanide content, with varying degrees of effectiveness. Cyanide is unobservable in cassava, leading to low awareness and high prevalence in many food markets in developing countries, which are informal and unregulated.

This proposed project’s overall objective is to co-produce knowledge and strategies to enhance the cyanide-safe cassava value chain and increase cassava products’ role in promoting economic growth, reducing poverty, and reducing hunger. We have four aims: (1) determining whether a market for cyanide-safe gari (a staple ingredient in many West African countries made from fermented cassava) can exist sustainably, which requires consumers to be willing to pay for the costs of processing cassava into safe gari; (2) train 600 smallholder farmers in Nigeria about the cyanide issue in cassava products and how to mitigate it, and estimate the impact of the training on demand for cyanide-safe gari; (3) calculate to what extent labeling gari as “cyanide-safe” increases demand for it; and (4) disseminate results to farmers, farmer associations, practitioners, policymakers, and researchers in Nigeria and worldwide. To measure the causal impacts of training and labeling on demand, we will implement a randomized control trial and measure demand with experimental, incentive-compatible auctions.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Adesina, Bukade, Jonathan Bauchet and Jacob Ricker-Gilbert. 2025. "Co-production of knowledge and strategies to enhance the cyanide-safe cassava value chain in Nigeria." AEA RCT Registry. June 23. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16249-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

Sponsors

Partner

Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Training of processors on methods of producing low-cyanide cassava gari (mostly letting cassava rest, or ferment, for at least 3 days during the process to turn cassava into gari. The training emphasizes rest/fermentation time, and also mentions other methods: resting cassava before grating, washing cassava, and toasting gari at the appropriate temperature.

Training of consumers on the existence and health dangers of cyanide in cassava gari. The training emphasizes the health consequences of cyanide ingestion from gari consumption.
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2025-06-23
Intervention End Date
2025-07-25

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Cyanide level in samples of cassava gari taken from small-scale rural processors
Processors' willingness to accept a payment to produce low-cyanide gari
Consumers' willingness to pay to purchase gari with various labels denoting likelihood to have low levels of cyanide
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
In the consumer study, consumers were randomly assigned by the tablet computer used to conduct the survey to be trained to receive training before or after they bid on three types of gari (unlabeled, labeled as produced by a farmer trained in how to produce low-cyanide gari, and labeled as tested cyanide-safe by the National Root Crop Institute's lab [with a certificate presented as documentation]).

In the processor study, villages were randomly assigned to be in the control group, treatment 1 group (training), or treatment 2 group (training + WTA auction).
- The training consisted of informing processors about the existence and health dangers of cyanide, and methods to reduce cyanide in gari through proper processing. The training was designed by a food scientist at the National Root Crop Research Institute in Umudike, Nigeria.
- The WTA auction was a Becker-Degroote-Marschak auction to measure the amount of a price premium that processors required to produce gari in accordance with proper practices, leading to low cyanide levels.
- In the control group, processors were trained after gari was sampled the second time.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization in office done by a computer
Randomization Unit
Village
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
80 villages
Sample size: planned number of observations
1200 gari processors
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
24 villages in control group; 24 villages in treatment 1 group; 32 villages in treatment 2 group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
MDES = 0.26 standard deviations
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Purdue University Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2025-05-19
IRB Approval Number
IRB-2025-629
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Pre-analysis plan

MD5: 363634593ef3062cde51f161a9ed8e13

SHA1: accf3cbb85a8a688522da17570c212eaccf333a2

Uploaded At: June 21, 2025

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials