Testing 2026 Census messaging

Last registered on July 28, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Testing 2026 Census messaging
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016450
Initial registration date
July 27, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 28, 2025, 9:43 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Behavioural Economics Team of the Australian Government

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2025-07-21
End date
2026-07-21
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
BETA is conducting research in partnership with the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) to understand what messaging is most effective at improving knowledge and awareness of various aspects of the Census of Population and Housing (Census). The Census is undertaken every five years by the ABS, with the next Census to be held in 2026.
The research will include interviews and a survey experiment to design and test communication approaches and evaluate their effect on people’s knowledge and awareness of administrative data use in the Census. The findings will be used to inform the ABS’s broader communications strategy for the 2026 Census.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Team Registration, BETA. 2025. "Testing 2026 Census messaging." AEA RCT Registry. July 28. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16450-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The interventions will be 4 different messages focusing on different behavioural interventions. There will also be a standard control, and an attention control.
Control: A standard ABS message about completing the Census.
Attention Control (AC): A standard ABS message about administrative data.
Intervention 1 (T1): Question and answer format.
Intervention 2 (T1): Case study format.
Intervention 3 (T1): Use of metaphors.
Intervention 4 (T4): Highlighting the benefits.
Intervention Start Date
2025-07-21
Intervention End Date
2025-07-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The primary outcome for this trial will be the group mean proportion of correct responses.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
We will ask a series of True/False questions of participants. Ten of these questions will ask about Census administrative data, and data and privacy, and 5 will ask general questions about the Census. The order of these questions will be randomised.
Our primary outcome will only use the 10 questions relating to administrative data used by the Census. Responses to each item will be binary (1= correct, 0 = incorrect), and scores are summed (range 0-10). Missing or ‘Don’t know’ responses will be coded as incorrect. At an individual level the raw score will be converted into a proportion (0-1) representing the share of correctly classified items for each person. Individual level scores will be averaged within treatment groups to provide the proportion correct for each arm.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
There will be two secondary outcomes, peoples’ willingness to complete the Census and their beliefs in misinformation relating to the Census.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Willingness to complete the Census
At an individual level, we will collect participant’s self-reported willingness to complete the Census. This will be a continuous measure collected by asking participants their willingness on a 11-point scale from 0 (not willing to complete the census) to 10 (willing to complete the Census). Individual level outcomes will be averaged within groups to provide the mean willingness by arm.

Beliefs in Misinformation about the Census
Four of True/False questions asked as part of the primary outcome are based on misinformation about the Census that has been shared on social media. However, we code these responses differently from the primary outcome. Responses to each item will be binary (1= incorrect, 0 = correct), and scores are summed (range 0-4). Missing or ‘Don’t know’ responses will be coded as 0. Like the primary outcome, at an individual level the raw score will be converted into a proportion (0-1) representing the share of correctly classified items for each person. Individual level scores will be averaged within treatment groups to provide the proportion correct for each arm.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This research will consist of a 6-arm randomised controlled trials embedded in a survey delivered online using the Qualtrics platform.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomisation will be conducted in Qualtrics using simple randomisation.
Randomization Unit
Individual respondents
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
6000
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
1000 per arm
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
This experiment has two families of tests. The first family of tests, test the hypothesis that providing information on data and privacy increases peoples knowledge over the control. The second family of tests, test whether behaviourally informed messages increase knowledge compared with the attention control. Refer the pre-analysis plan for the full set of hypotheses. Given we have two families of tests we have two sets of power calculations. For the first family our minimum effect of interest is 5 percentage points, and for the second family it is 3.5 percentage points. We set α = 0.01, and control for multiple comparisons with a Bonferroni correction. The first family of tests the power is 100%. This represents an overpowered trial for this family of tests. To account for this, we will interpret with caution any effect size below 5 percentage points and report exact p-values. For the second family of tests the power is 96%.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee Humanities and Social Sciences (HREC HASS)
IRB Approval Date
2025-07-11
IRB Approval Number
19171
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information