Abstract
This research project aims to investigate what workers think about the impact of AI on the labor market and, in particular, how this impact can shape their preferences for welfare-based policies. We will run an online survey experiment to test how different framings of AI – (i) labour substituting, (ii) labour complementing, (iii) skill upgrading necessity can affect the support for various public policies. After exposure to one of the treatments, respondents state their preferences for a set of labor-market policies, including unemployment income support, job retention schemes, minimum income programs, publicly funded training, and hiring subsidies. Our primary outcomes are a Likert-scale favorability score. Moreover, as a behavioral proxy, we measure respondents' willingness to sign a symbolic petition asking policymakers to regulate the impact of AI.