Enhancing Tax Compliance with Administrative Nudges: Experimental Insights from Indonesia

Last registered on October 20, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Enhancing Tax Compliance with Administrative Nudges: Experimental Insights from Indonesia
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016876
Initial registration date
September 29, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 03, 2025, 10:21 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
October 20, 2025, 3:50 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
DGT

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-10-01
End date
2025-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of administrative nudges in enhancing tax compliance among small businesses in Indonesia. Employing a field experimental approach, we assess the impact of low-cost, behaviourally informed interventions conveyed through administrative letters, which vary in their framing to include simplified information, deterrence-oriented messaging, and social norm appeals. Tax compliance is operationalised through observable filing and payment behaviours, allowing for a systematic evaluation of the causal effects of the interventions. The experimental design further enables an exploration of both sustained compliance outcomes and the dynamic patterns of taxpayer responses over time..
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Dularif, Muh et al. 2025. "Enhancing Tax Compliance with Administrative Nudges: Experimental Insights from Indonesia." AEA RCT Registry. October 20. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16876-1.1
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The experimental design focused on improving small businesses' tax compliance, particularly related to responses to administrative nudges which affecting their tax monthly payment and tax return submission compliance.

This trial employs three treatment letters: (1) a simplification letter, which reduces complexity in the existing correspondence, improves visual design, and adopts a less formal style; (2) a deterrence letter, which emphasises administrative penalties for non-compliance, the potential application of computerised audits, and subsequent enforcement actions; and (3) a public goods provision letter, which highlights taxpayers’ contributions to the national budget, with particular reference to public expenditure. Supplementary informative flyers are appended to the literacy and public goods provision letters. The use of colour schemes and graphical elements in the literacy and social norm letters is informed by the literature on colour psychology, with the objective of enhancing cognitive and affective engagement.

For the length of the experiment, the treatments will be contrasted with a control group comprised of individuals who did not receive the letters. The treatment impact of each intervention will be determined by comparing the average outcomes of the intervention group to those of the control group. There will be no interaction testing between treatments.
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2025-10-15
Intervention End Date
2025-11-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Taxpayer's inbound communication (responses)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Taxpayer responses refer to the behavioural adjustments undertaken by taxpayers in reaction to administrative interventions such as simplification, deterrence cues, and social norm appeals. These responses may be observed across several dimensions, including filing timeliness, accuracy of reported liabilities, and payment behaviour. Quantitatively, responses are measured by the volume of taxpayer communications with the tax office, while qualitatively they are assessed through the content of those communications.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Tax payment, tax filing
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This experimental design is structured to evaluate the effectiveness of taxpayer communication strategies through a carefully staged field trial. The intervention will be implemented in collaboration with Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) offices, with taxpayers randomly assigned to treatment and control groups to ensure comparability. The treatment consists of letters emphasising different behavioural prompts, allowing the trial to test which messages are most effective in encouraging compliance. By embedding randomisation at the taxpayer level, the design minimises bias and enhances the credibility of the causal inference that can be drawn from the results.

The trial proceeds in phases, beginning with a pilot in November 2025, during which approximately 16,000 letters will be distributed. This phase will primarily assess operational feasibility, logistics, and the responsiveness of taxpayers to the interventions, while also providing early insights into their impact. Longitudinal data collection will extend into early 2026, capturing taxpayer behaviour over multiple reporting cycles. To promote transparency and facilitate independent validation, the trial will be registered in the AEA RCT Registry, with de-identified data made available by the DGT on a restricted basis, ensuring both research integrity and strict confidentiality safeguards.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
To ensure credible stratified randomisation, taxpayers with comparable baseline characteristics were grouped into strata. Within each stratum, cases were randomly allocated to one of the treatment groups or to the control group, thereby achieving a balanced distribution of baseline characteristics across groups. Randomisation was implemented in \texttt{Stata\textsuperscript{\textregistered}} using a random variable generator with randomly selected seeds. For stratified randomisation, the user-written command \texttt{randtreat} (version~1.4) was employed.
Randomization Unit
regional tax office
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
7 regional tax offices
Sample size: planned number of observations
16,000 taxpayers
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
4000 taxpayers control, 4000 taxpayers T2, 4000 taxpayers T2, 4000 taxpayers T3
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials