Hours Determination in the US Labor Market

Last registered on February 04, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Hours Determination in the US Labor Market
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017235
Initial registration date
January 29, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
February 04, 2026, 9:51 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Southern California

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of North Carolina

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-12-01
End date
2026-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This paper investigates how work hours are determined in the U.S. labor market and the implications of different firm organizational structures for labor supply and worker welfare. We field a novel representative survey of 1,000 workers and 1,000 managers, matched at the firm level. First, we document heterogeneity in the modes of hours determination, where we expect to show that relatively few workers select their own hours, with decisions instead shaped by constraints set by their employer. We then examine how these modes vary across worker and firm characteristics, testing whether flexibility disproportionately accrues to higher-income workers. Second, we study how hour-setting institutions mediate labor supply elasticities by combining worker choice experiments with manager approval responses, shedding light on why macro and micro labor supply estimates diverge. Finally, we assess the extent and sources of hours mismatch, exploring informational frictions, belief misalignment between workers and managers, and conflicting preferences over hours. Together, our results provide new micro evidence on the determinants of work hours and offer insight into how institutional constraints shape labor supply responses.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Kohlhepp, Jacob and Simon Quach. 2026. "Hours Determination in the US Labor Market." AEA RCT Registry. February 04. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17235-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
We survey workers and their direct managers to understand how hours are determined in their company.
Intervention Start Date
2025-12-01
Intervention End Date
2026-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Desired hours of work under different scenarios (e.g. status quo, tax increase/decrease, salary increase/decrease, new job offer)

Employer constraints on work hours (e.g. your employee wants to work X more hours, do you approve?)

Beliefs and information about choice set of hours (e.g. When you applied for the job, did you know how many hours you would work? If you wanted to increase the number of hours you work each week, by how much do you think your employer is willing to increase your weekly hours?)

Worker and employer willingness to pay to set hours (e.g. Would you hire person A at X salary and they decide their own hours, or person B at Y salary and you decide their hours?)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The experimental design will use a combination of stated preference questions similar to Caldwell, Haegele, and Heining (2025) and choice experiments similar to Maestas et al. (2023).
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
All randomization are done on Qualtrics, with choices evenly distributed:

Tax and wage changes are randomized as 10% or 20%.

The magnitude of the hypothetical change in hours at the new job opportunity are uniformly drawn from 1 to 15.

The magnitude of the hypothetical change in pay to measure preferences for being able to select hours will be uniformly drawn from 1 to 10.
Randomization Unit
Pair level.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
1,000 pair of worker-managers
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,000 workers and 1,000 managers
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
1,000 pair of worker-managers. The treatment is within-individual since we measure their current hours, their desired hours at the moment, and their desired hours under different scenarios.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Office of Human Research Ethics
IRB Approval Date
2025-12-03
IRB Approval Number
492980
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information