Farmers’ willingness to contribute to circular economy: A framed field experiment from Kenya

Last registered on December 09, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Farmers’ willingness to contribute to circular economy: A framed field experiment from Kenya
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017400
Initial registration date
December 04, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 09, 2025, 7:41 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Copenhagen

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2025-11-24
End date
2025-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Tomato production has some of the highest crop losses in the fruit and vegetable supply chains of sub-Saharan Africa. Apart from high crop loss rates during and after harvest, tomato crops also leave huge amounts of solid waste after harvest. Improper disposal is not only economically careless but poses a threat to the environment. It is not clear what Kenyan farmers do with biowaste from tomato plants (leaves, stems and branches) after harvest. Among other options, tomato biowaste could be used for production of biochar, which is highly relevant in the Kenyan context given its potential to improve soil quality. We combine a lab-in-the-field public goods game with a randomized information intervention to determine acceptance of biochar as a biowaste upgrading method among Kenyan farmers and to test their willingness to accept collective as opposed to individual solutions for biochar production.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Trifkovic, Neda. 2025. "Farmers’ willingness to contribute to circular economy: A framed field experiment from Kenya." AEA RCT Registry. December 09. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17400-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention (Hidden)
We will implement a randomized field experiment to test if farmers have higher acceptance of specific circular economy practices, namely conversion of biowaste from tomato production into biochar, when the conversion is framed as an individual vs. collective issue.

We will implement a public goods game combined with two video treatments about circular economy solutions. The 1st treatment presents circular economy (biochar) as collectively beneficial. The 2nd treatment presents circular economy (biochar) as individually beneficial.

The control group watches a video that provides information about what biochar is, without framing or mentioning benefits. The video for the control group has the following content:
Biochar is a type of processed plant matter that is very rich in carbon. Lightweight, black and porous, it looks and feels very much like charcoal. But where charcoal is used for cooking and heat, biochar is used in soils to help grow crops. Biochar efficiently stores carbon from plant material instead of releasing it into the atmosphere. This makes it far cleaner than other forms of charcoal. It can be produced using any organic material from agriculture or forestry wastes such as wood chips or dead plants. Organic waste after tomato harvests such as leaves, stems and branches can also be used to produce biochar. Biochar is produced by burning these materials in an oxygen-deprived fire, in a process called pyrolysis. Production technologies range from commercial biochar production kilns to small-scale kilns operated on farms including drum kilns, retort kilns, brick kilns and and others. Biochar is often mixed with compost or other materials to improve soil properties by introducing beneficial nutrients. Biochar can also reduce soil degradation and groundwater pollution, which lowers costs, and increases food security and profitability for farmers.

Circular economy video treatments
1. Individual message treatment
The video starts with a broad biochar definition as in the control group and in addition contains the following facts about tomato production, biowaste and biochar:
An average farm produces around 3 tons of tomatoes per acre.
This leaves behind 1 ton of waste from stems, branches and leaves.
This waste can be converted to 400 kg of biochar.
The estimated value of this amount of biochar from tomato plant residue is 20,000 KSh.
This amount of biochar can be used to improve soil properties on 0.3 acres of land.

Key message
By repurposing on-farm waste, you can turn your farm into a green growth engine.
You reduce environmental damage.
You slow down global warming.
You produce more healthy foods.
You create more economic value.

2. Collective message treatment
The video starts with a broad biochar definition as in the control group and in addition contains the following facts about tomato production, biowaste and biochar:
Total tomato production in Kenya is 545,000 tons.
This leaves behind 180,000 tons of waste from stems, branches and leaves.
This waste can be converted to 72,000 tons of biochar.
The estimated value of this amount of biochar from tomato plant residue is 3.6 billion KSh.
This amount of biochar can be used to improve soil properties on 25,000 hectares of land.

Key message
By repurposing on-farm waste, we can turn our farms into green growth engines.
We reduce environmental damage.
We slow down global warming.
We produce more healthy foods.
We create more economic value.
Intervention Start Date
2025-11-24
Intervention End Date
2025-12-13

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Dependent variables are WTP, WTP measured as labor days, PGG contribution, beliefs about efficacy (personal vs. collective) and policy acceptance.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We implement a between-subject randomized field experiment to test if farmers have higher acceptance of specific circular economy practices, namely conversion of biowaste from tomato production into biochar, when the conversion is framed as an individual vs. collective issue.
Experimental Design Details
We implement a public goods game combined with two video treatments about circular economy solutions. The 1st treatment presents circular economy (biochar) as collectively beneficial. The 2nd treatment presents circular economy (biochar) as individually beneficial. The control group watches a video that provides information about what biochar is, without framing or mentioning benefits.

Public goods game (PGG)
Farmers are randomly assigned into groups and asked how much of their initial endowment they would like to contribute to a public good – a collective biochar facility. The contributions of all players in a group are multiplied by a constant factor, and the total multiplied contributions are evenly distributed among all players. The endowment could be 1000 KSh. The goal is to estimate the difference in contributions based on the framing treatment.

Survey questions and key variables
Apart from collecting key socio-demographic information about farmers, we will collect information about farming practices and willingness to pay (WTP) for biowaste upgrading.
Randomization Method
Public lottery
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
576
Sample size: planned number of observations
576
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
192
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
The Research Ethics Committee at the Department of Economics at University of Copenhagen
IRB Approval Date
2025-11-07
IRB Approval Number
NA

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials