Entrepreneurial Intentions and Employment Choices among University of Ghana Students: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Last registered on January 28, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Entrepreneurial Intentions and Employment Choices among University of Ghana Students: A Discrete Choice Experiment
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017431
Initial registration date
January 26, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
January 28, 2026, 7:52 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
January 28, 2026, 9:57 AM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Ferrara

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Ferrara
PI Affiliation
University of Ferrara
PI Affiliation
University of Ghana
PI Affiliation
University of Ghana

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-01-26
End date
2026-10-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Youth unemployment in Ghana has reached critical levels with opportunities in the formal sector unable to match the number of university graduates. Many young people are forced to choose between the security and advantages of limited formal employment and the flexibility and insecurity of informal work. In this context, entrepreneurship has increasingly been promoted as a viable alternative, but there’s limited empirical evidence on the degree to which entrepreneurial intentions influence the actual preference for employment. This research investigates how entrepreneurial intentions among students at the University of Ghana shape their decisions between formal and informal employment. Drawing on Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior, the study attempts to measure the students' entrepreneurial intention through attitudes, such as subjective norms and perceived behavioral control of students, and then use a discrete choice experiment to estimate how much they're willing to pay for specific job attributes. The purpose of the analysis is to develop a distinction as to whether the students with a more developed sense of entrepreneurial intentions are more oriented to choose informal work or whether, on the contrary, there are hybrid forms of work, in which formal work is related as a platform to pursue entrepreneurial future activities. The study ensures methodological rigor through balanced participation between males and females, clear criteria for inclusions, and strict ethical standards related to matters of confidentiality, consent, and data security. Expected outcomes include validated measures of entrepreneurial intention, estimates of willingness to pay for job characteristics, and evidence on the link between intentions and employment preferences.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
JOAO, CLERIO ANTONIO et al. 2026. "Entrepreneurial Intentions and Employment Choices among University of Ghana Students: A Discrete Choice Experiment." AEA RCT Registry. January 28. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17431-1.1
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The study consists of two main components: First, participants who are all students enrolled at the University of Ghana, complete a structured survey module designed to measure entrepreneurial intentions using Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior framework, including items on attitudes toward entrepreneurship, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. Second, participants take part in a discrete choice experiment consisting of ten stated-preference tasks. In each task, respondents are presented with two hypothetical job offers that vary randomly in monthly salary and in selected job attributes. These attributes capture key dimensions that differentiate formal and informal employment in the Ghanaian context, such as income stability, schedule flexibility, access to training, and social protection. Participants indicate their preferred job offer in each task, allowing for the estimation of preferences and willingness-to-pay for specific job characteristics.
Intervention Start Date
2026-01-26
Intervention End Date
2026-04-03

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The primary outcome is to measure students’ entrepreneurial intention using the Theory of Planned Behavior and their stated preference for formal versus informal employment through a discrete choice experiment, and estimate their willingness to pay for key job attributes such as income stability, flexibility, social protection, and training opportunities.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Entrepreneurial intention will be constructed as a composite index based on Theory of Planned Behavior items capturing attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. Employment preferences will be observed through binary choices between formal and informal hypothetical job advertisements in a discrete choice experiment. Willingness to pay (WTP) for each job attribute will be estimated using a probabilistic choice model based on a random utility framework, where WTP is derived from two parameters in the indirect utility function: the individual’s marginal utility of each job attribute and the individual’s marginal utility of the wage.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
The second outcome is the role of demographics, cultural and regional background, in shaping students’ entrepreneurial intentions and employment preferences.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
The second outcome will be derived by interacting the primary outcome measures with individual characteristics, including age, gender, region of origin, cultural background, and family income. These interactions will allow the study to analyze heterogeneity in entrepreneurial intentions and employment preferences across socio-demographic groups.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
In the first section of the survey, participants who are all students enrolled at the University of Ghana are asked to respond to a set of questions on demographic and socio-economic characteristics, including gender, age, ethnicity, region of birth and current region of residence, as well as current employment status and occupation. Additional questions cover academic department/programme, level of study, and year of enrolment, together with an approximate measure of family income to capture socio-economic background. Subsequently, the survey elicits students’ entrepreneurial intentions using Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). This module uses experimentally validated survey questions to capture the three core TPB components, attitudes toward entrepreneurship, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control, which are later combined to construct a composite entrepreneurial intention index.

In the second section, the survey involves ten stated-preference experimental questions. Each of these questions displays a pair of hypothetical job offers, namely COMPANY A and COMPANY B. In each task, the two job offers are described by a set of attributes that characterise both the nature of the job and the conditions under which it is performed, together with an offered monthly salary. The attributes are designed to reflect the key dimensions that differentiate formal and informal employment in the Ghanaian context, including (among others) job security and recognition, schedule flexibility, access to training, social protection/benefits (e.g., health coverage, paid leave, and handling of taxes/social security), wage/payment form (e.g., cash versus bank transfer), and employment procedures (e.g., structured admission versus open access). Each attribute takes on two levels corresponding to a more “informal” versus a more “formal” employment condition. The offered monthly salary is randomly assigned across COMPANY A and COMPANY B within a plausible range, consistent with entry-level earnings for university graduates, to ensure credible trade-offs while eliciting respondents’ preferences over job attributes and formality.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
For each of the ten experimental questions, the salary levels and the values of the varying attributes are randomized using a JavaScript-based algorithm.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
There is no cluster
Sample size: planned number of observations
The sample consists of 600 students aged 18 years and older, all enrolled at the University of Ghana. No minors are recruited for the study. Each participant is expected to complete a survey module on entrepreneurial intentions, followed by ten stated-preference experimental choice tasks.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
The treatment is identical for all participants.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Ethics Committee for the Humanities, University of Ghana
IRB Approval Date
2025-12-22
IRB Approval Number
ECH 094/25-26
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information