Inflation and Populist Views

Last registered on May 11, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Inflation and Populist Views
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018217
Initial registration date
May 07, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
May 11, 2026, 9:12 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Leibniz University Hanover

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Kiel Institute for the World Economy and Leibniz University Hanover
PI Affiliation
Kiel Institute for the World Economy

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-05-11
End date
2027-03-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study evaluates the causal effect of provided and retrieved information about inflation on populist views and trust in institutions, treating inflation expectations as a potential mediator variable. We randomly allocate respondents into seven treatment groups, which include information treatments and priming treatments. Treatments about past inflation are designed to trigger memories of high inflation and to remind respondents of past inflation forecast errors in central bank forecasts (T1) or to point out that price increases in particular goods categories like food can be much larger than overall inflation (T2). The treatments about current and past inflation inform people of the inflation rates of the past months as well as further predictions depending on the development of the Iran war, in a basic (T3) and severe (T4) scenario. There is also an active control group, which receives information about the projected lifespan of men and women (T5) and a passive control group, that receives no information (T6). Treatments T7 and T8 do not provide any information, instead respondents are asked to write a text about the implications of rising or falling inflation for the economy and for their personal situation. These treatments thus prime respondents to retrieve information on these inflation scenarios. We analyze the impact of provided or retrieved information about inflation on posterior populist views, where agreement with randomly chosen statements in the categories populism, pluralism, elitism and xenophobia is measured both before and after the treatment. In a similar manner, we measure trust in different public institutions both before and after the treatment. Inflation expectations may be a mediator variable for the causal impact of inflation on populist views and trust and is also measured before and after the treatment.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Dräger, Lena, Gianna Marchi and Ulrich Schmidt. 2026. "Inflation and Populist Views." AEA RCT Registry. May 11. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18217-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)


Intervention Start Date
2026-05-11
Intervention End Date
2026-06-15

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. inflation expectations/perceptions
2. populist views (index)
3. trust in institutions (index)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Following the approach of Akkerman et al. (2014), we use the proposed statements to measure populism, elitism and pluralism using a 1–5 Likert scale (1 – Strongly agree, 5 – Strongly disagree). We have also added the dimension of xenophobia. For each dimension, an average is calculated based on the corresponding statements. Finally, dimension-specific indices are combined to form an overall index.
Randomized questions about trust in different political institutions (on a scale from 0 to 10), that are summed to give an index of trust in public institutions).

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
First, we collect information about participants' financial literacy. Then, there will be two question blocks regarding inflation perceptions and expectations and populist views. These blocks will be randomized in their order of appearance. The pre-inflation block asks respondents about their perceived inflation rate as well as their expectations for the future 12-month and 5-year inflation rate and their perceived and expected wage growth. The populist block asks questions about the preference of parties, trust in certain institutions, and to rank political statements, forming the populist index later on. After collecting information about their spending shares with COICOP price indices, their risk, patience and general trust behavior, they receive information or priming treatments randomly. The survey collects data about the degree of novelty of this information. After the treatments, participants get asked about their posterior inflation expectations and populist views, once again, these question blocks appear in random order. Furthermore, the survey provides a question about economic worries of specific topics and asks participants about the reasons for heightened inflation over the past three years. Towards the end, we gather socio-demographic as well as housing situation variables.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization via otree programming
Randomization Unit
individual randomization during the survey: randomized treatments, randomized order of question blocks, randomized order of answers for some questions
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
2 survey waves
Sample size: planned number of observations
8000 survey respondents in wave 1 (where the experiment takes place), as many respondents as possible in a follow-up wave after 3 months
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
1000 survey respondents per treatement (only in wave 1)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Gesellschaft für Experimentelle Wirtschaftsforschung
IRB Approval Date
2026-04-13
IRB Approval Number
w5psCNa3
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information