The impact of religious identity on hiring outcomes

Last registered on April 24, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
The impact of religious identity on hiring outcomes
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018254
Initial registration date
April 20, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 24, 2026, 8:57 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Ghent University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Ghent University
PI Affiliation
Ghent University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-04-19
End date
2026-05-19
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
This factorial survey experiment investigates hiring discrimination based on religious identity in Belgium. Recruiters evaluate fictitious job candidates whose profiles vary systematically across multiple characteristics, including religion (Islam or Christianity), visual signals or religion (hijab, beard, cross pendant), extracurricular activities (religious or general volunteering), ethnic background signalled through names (minority represented by Turkish and Polish names, majority by Belgian names), and gender (male or female). The study simulates the first stage of a recruitment process, using an HR software package to present the profiles to real recruiters. Outcomes such as the likelihood to invite the candidate to a job interview and perceived candidate skills are analysed.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Baert, Stijn, Louise Devos and Louis Lippens. 2026. "The impact of religious identity on hiring outcomes." AEA RCT Registry. April 24. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18254-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
This study consists of a factorial survey experiment in which recruiters evaluate fictitious job candidates. Candidate profiles are presented in the format of an HR software interface and simulate the first stage of a recruitment process. Each respondent evaluates four candidate profiles and indicates hiring-related evaluations and perceptions.

Candidate profiles vary systematically across several experimentally manipulated dimensions, including gender, religious affiliation, visual signals of religion, ethnic background signalled through names, and extracurricular activities. The purpose of the intervention is to measure how religious identity and related signals affect hiring decisions and employer perceptions.

Profile pictures used in the experiment were selected based on a separate pre-registered photo validation study (https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/18099).
Intervention (Hidden)
This study employs a factorial vignette experiment to examine hiring discrimination based on religious identity and related ethnic signals. Recruiters evaluate fictitious school-leaving candidates who apply for jobs within the respondent’s own company.

The experimental design varies five candidate dimensions:

1. Gender (male; female)
2. Visual signal of religion (present; not present x2)
3. Ethnic background signalled through names (minority; majority x2)
4. Extracurricular activities (religious volunteering; general volunteering x2)
5. Religion (Islam; Christianity x2)

Candidate profiles are presented in a realistic HR software interface. Respondents evaluate four candidates and provide assessments of hiring probability and their perceptions regarding the candidate.

Profile photographs were selected using a separate pre-registered photo pretest. Because it was not feasible to obtain a sufficient number of photographs that were statistically equivalent within a narrow equivalence margin around the midpoint of perceived ethnic ambiguity, photographs were selected based on proximity to the midpoint of perceived ethnic origin. In the analysis, photograph fixed effects will be included in all regression analyses to control for all non-manipulated photograph characteristics, including perceived ethnicity and attractiveness.

The order of vignettes and survey items is randomized. The study also includes indirect questioning techniques and a Bayesian Truth Serum procedure to reduce social desirability bias.
Intervention Start Date
2026-04-19
Intervention End Date
2026-05-19

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
- Hiring probability: likelihood that the candidate will be invited to the next stage of the hiring process (11-point Likert scale).
- Taste-based discrimination perceptions: expected willingness of employer, colleagues, and clients to work with the candidate (11-point Likert scale).
- Statistical discrimination perceptions: 6 HEXACO dimensions, candidate personality traits: honesty–humility, emotionality, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness (11-point Likert scale).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
For taste-based discrimination and statistical discrimination, composite indices are constructed by taking the mean of the items within each conceptual cluster. Item-level analyses will also be conducted.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
- Perceived religiosity of the candidate (11-point Likert scale).
- Perceived religious affiliation of the candidate (Christian, Muslim, atheist, or unknown)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study is a factorial survey experiment in which recruiters evaluate fictitious job candidates. The experimental design varies five candidate characteristics: gender, religion, visual religious signals, ethnic background signalled through names, and extracurricular activities.

The full factorial design results in 162 unique candidate profiles. These profiles are distributed across 41 vignette decks, each containing four candidate profiles. Each respondent is randomly assigned to one deck and evaluates four candidates. The order of candidate profiles is randomised.

The experiment simulates a realistic hiring context in which recruiters evaluate candidates for positions within their own company.
Experimental Design Details
This study employs a factorial survey experiment to examine hiring discrimination based on religious and minority-associated ethnic identity markers. The experimental design systematically varies five dimensions: gender (male; female), visual signal religion (not present; present x2), ethnic background through name (minority; majority x2), extracurricular activities (religious volunteering; general volunteering x2), and religion (Islam; Christianity x2).

The different dimensions and accompanying levels are operationalised as follows:
- Gender: signalled through names and by explicit mention in the candidate profiles.
- Visual signal religion: hijab for Muslim women, beard for Muslim men, cross pendant for Christian women and men.
- Ethnic background through name: Turkish names for Muslim ethnic minorities, Polish names for Christian ethnic minorities. Specific names extracted from Martiniello & Verhaeghe (2022).
- Extracurricular activities: volunteer at church/mosque for religious volunteering, volunteer at local community centre for non-religious volunteering.
- Religion: this dimension determines the specific interpretation of the above dimensions. If religion or ethnic minority is not indicated anywhere in the above dimensions, this will not be reflected in the candidate profile.

This 2 × 3 × 3 × 3 × 3 design yields a vignette universe of 162 unique combinations. We generate 164 combinations using the %MktEx macro in SAS and partition these into 41 decks, each containing four vignettes, using the %MktBlock macro.
Randomization Method
As described in the study design, the %MktBlock macro is first used to allocate the vignettes to decks.

Participants are randomly assigned to one of the decks through Qualtrics. Within each deck, the order of vignette presentation is randomised through Qualtrics to mitigate potential order effects.
Randomization Unit
Respondents are randomly assigned to vignette decks, and vignette order is randomized within respondents.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
205 recruiters, each recruiter evaluates 4 candidate profiles.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Total expected observations: approximately 820 vignette evaluations
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Treatment variation occurs at the vignette level within respondents.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
The sample size is determined by the factorial survey design. Following Auspurg and Hinz (2014), each vignette deck should be evaluated multiple times to obtain stable estimates. With 41 decks and a target of at least five evaluations per deck, the required sample size is 205 respondents.
Supporting Documents and Materials

Documents

Document Name
Additional information
Document Type
other
Document Description
This document provides details on all variables manipulated and captured in the experiment.
File
Additional information

MD5: d149437de169ad1281f2351fda5b95b9

SHA1: 955229b1bfa458a95187f5b8235c9e8eefc59e12

Uploaded At: April 17, 2026

IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Analysis plan

MD5: 5f25668672a651e2b82c1815b06f4d12

SHA1: 2581d63554c55f6e071235ca858664c8c25689f2

Uploaded At: April 15, 2026

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials