Tax evasion and demand for progressivity

Last registered on June 17, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Tax evasion and demand for progressivity
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018912
Initial registration date
June 11, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 17, 2026, 9:06 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Universidad de Granada

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Universidad de Granada
PI Affiliation
Universidad de Barcelona
PI Affiliation
Universidad Pablo de Olavide

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2026-06-07
End date
2026-06-26
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The main objective of this project is to study how perceptions of tax compliance affect
preferences for the degree of progressivity of the personal income tax. Using a large-scale
survey experiment in Spain, we test whether providing individuals with information
about the actual level of tax compliance reduces their bias on this dimension and changes
their demand for tax progressivity. In particular, we examine whether information about
the differences in compliance levels between the very rich and the rest of the population
alters preferences for the tax burden on each group.

Registration Citation

Citation
Foremny, Dirk et al. 2026. "Tax evasion and demand for progressivity." AEA RCT Registry. June 17. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18912-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
This project is built on a large-scale survey experiment to be implemented in Spain. We implement a conventional pre-post information treatment, which exposes randomly selected participants to short videos providing information about the magnitude of tax evasion in the personal income tax (IRPF).
We measure the knowledge participants have before the experimental intervention, and ask similar questions after the treatment, to measure to which extent treated participants updated their beliefs.
We leverage participants’ responses to questions on preferences for tax progressivity to measure how information about the unequal distribution of tax evasion across income groups affects the desired tax burden on each group.

Intervention Start Date
2026-06-22
Intervention End Date
2026-06-26

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The key outcome variable is the demanded tax progressivity, defined as $\text{PROG}^* = t_r^* - t_p^*$, where $t_r^*$ is the respondent's preferred IRPF rate for individuals with monthly income above 43,000 euros (the top 0.1\%) and $t_p^*$ is the preferred IRPF rate for individuals with monthly income below that threshold (a group with mean monthly income of approximately 2,000 euros). Both rates are elicited post-treatment in all arms on a 0--100 slider. A pre-treatment measure of general attitudes towards progressivity is also elicited and used as a baseline covariate.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We randomize participants into three groups with equal probability:

• Control (C): receives no information treatment.

• Rich video (T1): receives a short video informing about the average tax compliance
of the top 0.1% of the income distribution in Spain (xr ≈ 77%).

• Non-rich video (T2): receives a short video informing about the average tax compliance
of the remaining 99.9% of the income distribution (xp ≈ 97%).

The two videos are matched in structure, length, narration style, and visual treatment. Both cite the Spanish Tax Agency (Agencia Tributaria) as the source of the figures.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization is done at the individual level by Netquest, the
survey provider, at the point of survey administration. Each
respondent is assigned with equal probability (1/3) to one of the
three arms (Control, T1, T2). Netquest applies ex-ante quotas on
gender, age, education, and region to ensure that the final sample
is representative of the Spanish adult population. Balance across
arms on pre-treatment covariates will be checked ex-post and
reported in the empirical section.
Randomization Unit
individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
7,650
Sample size: planned number of observations
7,650
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
2,550
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
COMITE DE ETICA EN INVESTIGACION HUMANA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA
IRB Approval Date
2026-06-09
IRB Approval Number
6100