AI-Powered Professional Learning Communities

Last registered on September 09, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
AI-Powered Professional Learning Communities
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018950
Initial registration date
September 02, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
September 09, 2026, 4:07 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
New Teacher Center

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-09-14
End date
2028-07-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
New Teacher Center’s recent federal Education and Innovation Research grant demonstrates that well-facilitated Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) lead to teacher growth and student learning. In this study, we will partner with an artificial intelligence-driven educator coaching tool to explore the effectiveness and impact of teacher PLCs that receive AI-enabled feedback compared to PLCs that self-assess
without neutral party, low inference feedback. If proven effective, an AI-enabled feedback approach could yield a highly cost-effective, impactful coaching tool for school communities.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Schmitt, Lisa. 2026. "AI-Powered Professional Learning Communities." AEA RCT Registry. September 09. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18950-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Professional Learning Communities, or PLCs, are now a widely utilized structure in schools that can have a transformative effect on teachers and student learning. Findings from NTC's recent federal Education and Innovation Research (EIR) grant found that consistent PLC participation by teachers (defined as 90 minutes a month for seven months) showed a statistically significant and positive relationship with student math and reading achievement. These validated results confirm what we know from research — when school leaders prioritize instructionally focused, team-based professional learning, teachers and students benefit (Hudson, 2023). And yet, we know that PLCs are often underutilized or poorly implemented (Cordelia et al., 2024) — a missed opportunity for school communities to improve instruction and develop teachers. In too many schools and districts, PLCs function as logistical or administrative meetings. In fact, data from RAND indicate that only 31 percent of teachers report they have sufficient or quality opportunities to collaborate with peers (Berglund and Johnston, 2018).

This study explores how peer learning and the effectiveness of PLC conversations are impacted by (1) the presence of “neutral party” (i.e., AI delivered) low inference feedback and (2) calibrated reflection on evidence-based criteria for developing teacher expertise through PLCs. In other words, does AI feedback on specific high-impact characteristics of PLC conversations and collaborative teaching practices augment and enable skill development and long-term enactment of new practices for participating teachers?

Beginning with training for school leaders and PLC facilitators, NTC will support and develop shared understanding of the criteria for effective PLCs and introduce a resource for PLC self-assessment and goal-setting. Over two school years, PLCs will meet regularly and will engage in periodic self-reflection to guide their practice. Additionally, PLC facilitators will submit video recordings of their PLC meeting conversation to an AI platform each month. A group of PLCs in the AI treatment condition will receive regular feedback from the platform to support self-reflection and improvement, reinforcing professional learning on effective PLCs and collaborative instructional practices.
Intervention Start Date
2026-09-15
Intervention End Date
2028-05-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Teacher practices including collaborative planning and student-centered instructional strategies
Teacher attitudes and beliefs including self-efficacy, school climate, and value of PLCs
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Student actions including active engagement in learning
Quality of student work
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Half of PLCs will be assigned to AI-enabled feedback condition, and the other half will be assigned to the no-AI condition.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
stratified random assignment via SAS
Randomization Unit
PLC
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
We will have 40 to 60 PLCs participating over a two-year period. Each PLC may have some teachers who leave or join.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Each PLC will have an average of 4 teachers, so we assume a sample of up to 240 teachers and 60 PLC facilitators.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
120 teachers in the AI-enabled feedback condition, 120 teachers in the no-AI condition
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Advarra
IRB Approval Date
2026-09-01
IRB Approval Number
IRB#00000971