The Value of Public Employment: A Survey Experiment

Last registered on July 23, 2026
View Trial History

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
The Value of Public Employment: A Survey Experiment
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0019202
Initial registration date
July 20, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 23, 2026, 8:11 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Name
Pedro de Souza Ferreira
Affiliation
Harvard Kennedy School
Contact Primary Investigator

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-07-27
End date
2027-07-31
Keywords
Labor
Additional Keywords
Public employment; labor-market beliefs; job amenities; Brazil.
JEL code(s)
J45, J31, J64, D83, C93
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study uses a survey experiment to measure how students and workers in Brazil perceive and value public employment relative to private employment. Participants report baseline beliefs about wages, job stability, and probabilities of entering public and private employment under different search strategies. They are then randomly assigned to receive aggregate labor-market information about one of these topics or to a no-information control condition. After the information module, the survey elicits expected wages, reservation wages, cross-sector switching thresholds, career-path probabilities, willingness to pay for additional information through a Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism, and choices over hypothetical jobs in a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

The main hypotheses are that public employment is valued because of a combination of perceived wages, perceived stability, perceived entry probabilities, and non-wage amenities; that information changes beliefs and downstream choices; that demand for information depends on what participants already know and what information they have already received; and that the DCE can recover willingness to pay for public-sector employment, lower dismissal risk, remote work, teamwork, regular hours, and contract type. The analysis will estimate intention-to-treat effects of information on beliefs, reservation wages, crossing thresholds, BDM willingness to pay, and DCE choices, with pre-specified heterogeneity by family public-sector exposure, state, academic program or field, previous experience with concursos publicos, and selected exploratory moderators such as risk tolerance, family norms, mobility constraints, and salary-privacy norms.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
de Souza Ferreira, Pedro. 2026. "The Value of Public Employment: A Survey Experiment." AEA RCT Registry. July 23. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.19202-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention is a randomized information-provision experiment embedded in an online survey about public and private employment in Brazil. After reporting baseline beliefs about public- and private-sector wages, job stability, and entry probabilities, participants are randomly assigned to receive one short module of objective, aggregate labor-market information on one of three topics — wages, job stability, or probability of entry — or to a no-information control arm. The information is presented as group-level statistics (drawn from Brazil's PNAD Continua for comparable groups) and states explicitly that the figures describe groups and do not determine what will happen to any individual. After the information module, participants complete an incentivized Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) exercise eliciting willingness to pay for one additional information topic (which is drawn randomly among one of the three topics not yet displayed), and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) in which they choose between pairs of hypothetical jobs that vary in wage, sector, dismissal risk, remote work, teamwork, work pace, and contract type.
Intervention Start Date
2026-07-27
Intervention End Date
2026-08-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Primary outcomes fall into three families, all measured within the same survey after the R1 information module:

1) Beliefs and belief updating: own expected prospects about wages, one-year job-loss probability, and entry probability under different search strategies.

2) Reservation wages, crossing thresholds, and subjective probabilities: reservation wage in the public sector (RW_P), reservation wage in the private sector (RW_R), the gap RW_R − RW_P and its log version, the minimum public salary required to leave private jobs anchored at R$15,000 and R$20,000, and
the subjective probabilities of future career paths (from zero to 100), in particular: private sector jobs, public sector jobs, entrepreneurship, pursuing further education, moving to a different city, and moving abroad).

3) Willingness to pay for information (BDM): the bid (maximum amount given up) for additional wage, stability, or entry-probability information.

3) DCE choices and implied willingness to pay: the chosen job profile in each of six tasks, and implied monthly willingness to pay for public/statutory employment, lower dismissal risk, remote work, teamwork, respecting regular hours, and contract type (CLT vs PJ, and the public/statutory bundle).

Treatment effects are estimated as intention-to-treat effects of information assignment relative to control, and as topic-specific effects on the corresponding belief family (assigned a topic vs not).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1) Current employment and job search: employment/internship status, sector and public/private branch, contract type, earnings category, hours, tenure, whether searching for another job, and search method.

2) Information environment: what participants search before applying, and sources used (concurso websites, social networks, family, professors/mentors, job platforms).

3) Concurso experience: whether they studied for a public-sector exam or selection process in the last year and weekly preparation hours.

4) Stated future trajectories and open text: imagined private job, imagined public/statutory job, and ideal-job descriptions; perceived clarity, usefulness, surprise, and specificity of the information shown.

4) Values, mobility, and norms: family-vs-work tradeoffs, perceived control over life, family obligation and neolocality items, willingness to move, salary-privacy norms, and willingness to discuss wages.

5) Risk: general willingness to take risks (0–10) and a simple risky-lottery choice.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This is an individual-level online survey experiment. The main randomization (R1) assigns each participant to one of four arms: wage information, stability information, entry-probability information, or a no-information control. A second randomization (R2) determines which not-yet-shown information topic is offered in an incentivized BDM exercise and the random price that determines whether it is delivered. A third randomization (R3) generates six pairs of hypothetical job profiles per participant, randomizing job attributes subject to logical restrictions that ensure the job profiles are credible. The main analysis estimates intention-to-treat effects of R1 assignment (relative to control) on beliefs, reservation wages and crossing thresholds, BDM willingness to pay, and DCE choices, with pre-specified heterogeneity by parental public-sector employment, state, program/field, prior concurso experience, and baseline beliefs. Treatment is not clustered; respondent-level standard errors are heteroskedasticity-robust and DCE standard errors are clustered by respondent. The study is fielded to two samples — UnB undergraduates and an online sample of Brazilian workers/job-seekers — analyzed separately and, secondarily, pooled with sample fixed effects and treatment-by-sample interactions.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done by a computer. Assignment is generated within the online survey instrument (Qualtrics) using its embedded-data random-number generator, which draws pseudo-random integers at the start of each respondent's session. The main information arm is a random integer 0–3 (information_group); the BDM offered topic and price and the DCE profile attributes are set by further within-survey random draws. The randomization uses simple (unstratified) individual random assignment.
Randomization Unit
Individual participant (respondent). All treatment randomizations — the main information arm, the BDM topic and price, and the DCE profile attributes — are at the individual level, in both the student and worker samples.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Not clustered — the unit of randomization is the individual, so there is effectively one individual per "cluster". In cluster terms: up to 500 undergraduate students at the University of Brasilia (student sample) plus a planned online sample of approx. 500 adult workers / job-seekers in Brazil = up to approx. 1,000 individuals.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Up to approx. 2,000 individuals: <=500 undergraduates at the University of Brasilia and <=500 online Brazilian workers/job-seekers. Randomization and the primary respondent-level analyses are at the individual level. For the profile-level DCE analysis only, each respondent contributes 6 tasks x 2 profiles = 12 job-profile records (up to ~12,000 profile observations), but the unit of randomization and of the main outcomes is the individual.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Four arms with equal assignment probability. Under the simple (unstratified) randomization implemented in Qualtrics, realized cell sizes are approximate rather than exactly:

Control (no information): 125 students, 125 workers;
Wage information: 125 students, 125 workers;
Stability information: 125 students, 125 workers;
Entry-probability information: 125 students, 125 workers.

The BDM topic/price randomization (R2) and the DCE profile randomization (R3) are nested within every arm and are not separate allocation arms. The BDM offered topic is balanced across not-yet-shown topics.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
MDEs computed from sample size alone, for a standardized outcome (SD = 1), two-sided alpha = 0.05, 80% power, no covariate adjustment, and simple randomization with equal arms. MDE = (z.975 + z.80) x sqrt(1/n1 + 1/n2) = 2.80 x sqrt(1/n1 + 1/n2), expressed in standard deviations of the outcome. Pairwise - one info arm vs control: N = 200: 0.56 SD N = 500: 0.35 SD N = 1000: 0.25 SD
Supporting Documents and Materials
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
CEP da Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP)
IRB Approval Date
2026-07-14
IRB Approval Number
98846526.4.0000.0008
Analysis Plan