Improving the Reach of Crop Residue Management Services: An Information Experiment with Super Seeder Service Providers in Punjab, India

Last registered on October 16, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Improving the Reach of Crop Residue Management Services: An Information Experiment with Super Seeder Service Providers in Punjab, India
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0019806
Initial registration date
October 06, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 16, 2026, 1:59 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Michigan State University
PI Affiliation
Michigan State University
PI Affiliation
University of San Francisco

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2026-08-29
End date
2027-01-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The Government of Punjab has subsidized the purchase of crop residue management machinery to provide farmers with alternatives to burning crop residue. Among the various types of machinery available using this subsidy, super seeders are the most commonly purchased by Punjabi farmers. Super seeders are an in-situ crop residue management technology that sows wheat while incorporating rice stubble into the soil. Many super seeder owners provide custom hiring services to other farmers, but the reach and utilization of these machines vary substantially. One potential constraint is that farmers may not know which machinery owners provide services, how to contact them, or whether they serve neighboring villages. This cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluates whether increasing the visibility of super seeder service providers expands their service provision. The study includes 130 seed villages in three districts of Punjab. Seed villages will be randomly assigned in equal proportions to a treatment or control group. The research team will compile a verified roster of eligible, consenting individual super seeder service providers based in each treatment seed village. Before farmers book services for the 2026 wheat sowing season, Punjabi-language flyers that display each listed provider’s name, base village, and telephone number will be distributed within treatment seed villages. Provider names will appear in a randomized order that is held constant across flyers within the same village. Farmers may contact providers directly to discuss availability, prices, timing, and other service arrangements. Flyers will also be placed in a village neighboring each respective treatment village. Control villages will receive no study-provided information or a flyer intervention. Following the wheat planting season, service providers in treatment and control villages will be surveyed about the number of farmers and acres served, geographic reach, new customers, customer acquisition channels, machine utilization, and unmet demand. The primary hypothesis is that reducing information frictions will increase the acreage served by super seeder providers based in treatment villages, relative to those in the control villages.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Fisher, Ian et al. 2026. "Improving the Reach of Crop Residue Management Services: An Information Experiment with Super Seeder Service Providers in Punjab, India." AEA RCT Registry. October 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.19806-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Treatment seed villages will receive Punjabi-language flyers displaying the verified service provider roster (their name and phone numbers), a super seeder photograph, and an invitation to contact listed service providers directly about availability, prices, timing, and service arrangements. Flyers will be distributed only within treatment seed villages and their corresponding selected neighbor village. Efforts will be made to distribute one flyer will be given per household in the village. Provider order will be randomized and kept identical across flyers within that village. The flyers will include a disclaimer that farmers are under no obligation to contact or hire listed providers and that the names on the flyer appear in no particular order.
Intervention Start Date
2026-10-15
Intervention End Date
2026-11-15

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Our primary outcomes are:
- Average acreage served per service provider per machine
- Average number of farmers served per service provider per machine
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Our secondary outcomes are:
- Number of villages in which services were provided
- Total service acreage outside the provider’s home village
- Number of new farmers served in own and other villages
- Acreage of new farmers served in own and other villages
- Number of repeat farmers served in own and other villages
- Acreage of repeat farmers served in own and other villages
- Maximum distance from the provider’s base to a service location
- Number of days and/or hours of super seeder operation for service provision
- Number of days and/or hours of super seeder operation at own-farm operation
- Number of advance bookings
- Machine idle time during the feasible service window
- Total number of days of super seeder season
- Number of inquiries or service requests received
- Number of farmers (and acres) requesting services that could not be accommodated
- Service provision price charged per acre, by acreage and by village
- Super Seeder service revenue
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The experiment will be conducted in Bathinda, Sangrur, and Ferozepur districts of Punjab, India. Seed villages were selected using administrative data on subsidized crop residue machinery ownership. Eligible seed villages have at least one service provider and at least two individually owned Super seeders (the two machines need not belong to different owners). Selection was stratified by district. Selected seed villages were required to be at least 5 km from other selected seed villages. The planned sample is 130 seed villages, distributed across three districts as follow:
- Bathinda: 44
- Sangrur: 44
- Ferozepur: 42

Recruitment will use a common (neutral) explanation of the study objectives. For listing in the flyer, providers must be based (reside) in a treatment seed village, own an operational Super Seeder, and intend to offer services to other farmers during the upcoming sowing season (2026 winter sowing season). The field team will: (1) Obtain both consent for research participation and consent for publication of contact details, (2) Verify each provider’s preferred public name, base village, and telephone number, and (3) Maintain a log/record of recruitment attempts, eligibility check result, refusals (if any), and flyer listing consent. The recruitment script will explain that participation does not guarantee additional customers and that participation is completely voluntary. Recruitment team members will not arrange bookings, introduce customers, recommend prices, offer marketing advice, or describe service providers as government-endorsed or quality-certified.

Households in treatment seed villages will receive Punjabi-language flyers (in Gurmukhi script) with the following information, whose English translation is:
- Header line: “For wheat sowing services using a Super Seeder, contact any of the service providers listed below.”
- A list of verified service providers (Name and phone number), listed in no particular order
- Name of the district and the village
- Disclaimer: “These service providers are listed only to help farmers book Super Seeder wheat sowing services. The names are listed in no particular order. This list is for information only and does not imply endorsement of any service provider.”

One neighboring village per treatment village will also receive the same flyer as distributed in the corresponding treatment village. The criteria for selecting the neighboring village is as follows. First, we find a list of qualified candidate neighboring villages based on this criteria: (1) The candidate neighbor village’s polygon must be adjacent to the treatment village’s polygon and (2) The candidate neighbor village’s polygon must not be adjacent to any other seed village’s polygon (treatment or control) or any another selected neighbor. If there is only one neighbor candidate that meets these two criteria, that village is selected. If there are multiple neighbor candidates, the candidate neighbor with the least number of super seeder machines purchased via the government subsidy program is selected. If there remains a tie at this stage, the candidate village is selected with the closest centroid-to-centroid straight-line distance. In all cases, the selected village neighbor must be unique i.e. each picked neighbor village can only be assigned to one treatment village. At the end of this process, 4 treatment villages remained without a valid neighbor. The following manual procedure was utilized for these exceptions: (1) pick the neighbor village whose polygon minimally shares a border with another already picked neighbor village, (2) if selection still unsatisfied, pick the neighbor village whose polygon minimally shares a border with a treatment village, and (3) if selection remains unsatisfied, pick the neighbor village whose polygon minimally shares a border with another control village. For the exceptions that we resolved, we were able to entirely use (1) and minimally used (2). We never needed to assign a village neighbor based on (3).

Control seed villages will receive no study-provided information or flyers. No flyers will be distributed in any neighboring villages to control villages and service providers and farmers in control villages may continue using existing advertising, information sharing, and coordination channels.

Flyers will be distributed only within treatment seed villages (and their one corresponding selected neighbor village). Local people will be paid and recruited to distribute flyers in the treatment and one neighboring village. The goal will be to reach as many households as possible either by visiting door-to-door or distributing flyers at community gathering places, like the Gurudwara.

Treatment assignment will be stratified by district and will be at the seed village level (i.e. clustered RCT design). The experimental unit is the seed village and the intervention is intended to expand demand for services offered by Super Seeder service providers based in the randomized seed village. The study design additionally specifies a geographic allocation procedure to assess separation between treatment and control locations and covariate balancing (to limit contamination as much as possible). 5 km of separation was determined to be the proper distance as service provision in outside villages falls sharply after 5 km, on average.

Villages were randomized into treatment and control using district-stratified matched-pair randomization. Within each district, villages were ordered according to the number of Super Seeder service providers, a Mahalanobis index of baseline average super seeder service-market characteristics in each village (average number of super seeder units available per provider for providing services, 2025 acres served per machine, 2025 farmers served per machine, villages served per machine, and maximum service distance), and the total number of super seeder machines purchased in a machinery till date using the crop residue management subsidy. Adjacent villages in this ordering were grouped into pairs. Within each matched pair, one village was randomly assigned to treatment and the other to control with equal probability. Randomization was conducted using a pre-specified random-number seed. The number of villages assigned to treatment and control by district is as follows:
- Bathinda: 22 treatment villages and 22 control villages
- Sangrur: 22 treatment villages and 22 control villages
- Ferozepur: 21 treatment villages and 21 control villages

With the exception of the total number of super seeder machines, all variables are constructed from baseline survey data. Total number of super seeder machines was calculated using district-level government-supplied super seeder purchasing data based on government subsidy.

Baseline survey of service providers was conducted in August and September 2026 across all study villages prior to the rice harvesting season. All the service providers will be revisited after the wheat sowing season (tentatively scheduled to begin at the end of November) to collect endline service provider-level information. At this time, all respondents will receive one small gift in appreciation of their time. Each gift will be valued between INR 200 - 300.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization will be done in office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
The unit of randomization is the village.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
The planned number of clusters is 130 (villages): 65 treatment villages and 65 control villages.
Sample size: planned number of observations
The study intends to survey all eligible, consenting service providers based in the 130 randomized seed villages at endline. The number of interviewed service providers in the baseline survey among all villages that will be providing services in 2026 is 834: - Bathinda: 309 observations - Ferozepur: 281 observations - Sangrur: 244 observations
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
The sample size by treatment arms will be: 65 control villages and 65 treatment villages (1 treatment arm)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
For the main outcome of acres per Super Seeder machine, baseline mean is 66.16 (50.90) with MDE of 19.916 (30.1%). For the main outcome of farmers served per Super Seeder machine, baseline mean is 9.34 (6.54) with MDE of 2.503 (26.8%).
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Michigan State University Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2026-10-05
IRB Approval Number
STUDY202601247