Back to History Current Version

Does Providing Women Living in Rural Areas with Innovative Financial Education Change Household Expenditure and Saving Behaviour?

Last registered on November 18, 2017

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Does Providing Women Living in Rural Areas with Innovative Financial Education Change Household Expenditure and Saving Behaviour?
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0002368
Initial registration date
September 30, 2017

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 02, 2017, 10:02 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
November 18, 2017, 9:36 AM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Monash University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies(BIDS)
PI Affiliation
Monash University
PI Affiliation
Monash University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2018-02-01
End date
2019-10-30
Secondary IDs
Abstract
A strong association between low financial literacy and poor financial well-being is well-documented in the literature. Thus far, findings suggest a weak, if not zero, impact of standard financial education on improving financial outcomes. The aim of this project is to test whether simplified or tailored “just-in-time” financial treatments can surpass traditional financial literacy education to improve the financial literacy and savings behaviour of women in rural household Bangladesh.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Iqbal, Zabid et al. 2017. "Does Providing Women Living in Rural Areas with Innovative Financial Education Change Household Expenditure and Saving Behaviour?." AEA RCT Registry. November 18. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.2368-2.0
Former Citation
Iqbal, Zabid et al. 2017. "Does Providing Women Living in Rural Areas with Innovative Financial Education Change Household Expenditure and Saving Behaviour?." AEA RCT Registry. November 18. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/2368/history/23298
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
We test whether innovative and intensive treatments can surpass the traditional financial literacy education, with the target group of young women at the age of 20 to 30 in rural Bangladesh. The first treatment follows the traditional approach of financial training intervention: each member would take part in a short course of basic financial knowledge using a standardized curriculum.

We propose the use of the financial diary as a less intensive, and more applicable, as the simplified alternative to the traditional financial literacy program. Financial diaries are believed to help households manage daily expenses: cut unnecessary expenditure and save for unforeseen expenses.

Thirdly, we employ personal coaching as a real but narrower role for "just-in-time" financial intervention, tied to specific behaviours it intends to help. Counselings has the advantage of high relevance, low memory lapse between information receipt and behaviour. This approach is an attempt to test for the claim of "financial education fallacy": while "outsourcing" financial decision can appear to be expensive at first glance, it is a more feasible and cost-effective option once we have taken true cost of effective financial education into account.

We develop a set tests to measure the impact of our interventions on multiple dimensions of financial literacy including financial confidence, financial attitude and financial behaviour. Other objectives measurements involve changes in savings and income, numeracy tests, and a financial knowledge test.

Subject to additional funding, participants will be invited to join an artifactual games to measure the impact of interventions on the treatment group risk preferences and level of financial confidence. Moreover, we plan to further survey participants one year after the program has ended to examine whether improvements in their development outcomes persist over the time

Intervention Start Date
2018-02-12
Intervention End Date
2019-02-28

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Financial literacy is measured using four outcomes of interest: financial knowledge, financial confidence, financial behaviour, and financial attitude.
Savings behaviour is measured by household account balance post treatment.
Other outcomes variables of interest include women empowerment and exposure to financial instruments.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
The financial literacy outcomes will be measured by the knowledge, numeracy and scenario-based tests before and after treatment.
The exposure to financial instruments are measured by the likelihood of intention to apply for saving accounts, loan, pension fund, and other tools. Finally, female autonomy is represented by the likelihood of new employment, a rise in income, the intention to open a new business, and the responses to women-empower scenario surveyed questions.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Financial behaviour outcomes will be measured by the performance in the post-treatment lab-in-the-field games: risk-taking, over-confidence, time discount, and leadership. The husband of the household will also be invited to participate in gender games.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Participants are randomly allocated into three different treatment groups. Group A will only receive financial diary tool and guidance, Group B will undertake a financial training using standardised curriculum and Group C will have receive A or B plus the access to tailored financial counselling. The control group will receive none of the treatment.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
individual women. randomization would be carried out at the individual level. women from the same villages will be randomized in one of the three treatment groups. control villages will not have any intervention.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
120 villages
Sample size: planned number of observations
1800 women (from 1800 households), roughly 15 households per village.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
500 women in Treatment A - simplified financial diary.
500 women in Treatment B - standard financial education.
500 women in Treatment C - financial counselling: 250 women will receive financial diary plus counselling while the other 250 will receive financial training and financial counselling
300 women in Control group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
(This section will be updated after the pilot)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2017-09-11
IRB Approval Number
2017-10656-13528

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials