Time involvement and consumers' willingness to pay for information

Last registered on February 16, 2018

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Time involvement and consumers' willingness to pay for information
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0002697
Initial registration date
February 14, 2018

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
February 16, 2018, 1:58 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Cornell University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Cornell University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2018-02-25
End date
2018-02-26
Secondary IDs
Abstract
This experiment will help to get a better understanding of how people value information. The research is to test whether people will pay for useless information and what kind of internal and external factors push them to do so. In this context, useless information is information that cannot beneficially inform future decisions. This study identifies the impact of effort investment in decision-making process and consumers' willingness to pay for the information.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Gabrielyan, Gnel and David Just. 2018. "Time involvement and consumers' willingness to pay for information." AEA RCT Registry. February 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.2697-1.0
Former Citation
Gabrielyan, Gnel and David Just. 2018. "Time involvement and consumers' willingness to pay for information." AEA RCT Registry. February 16. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/2697/history/25893
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2018-02-25
Intervention End Date
2018-02-26

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The willingness to pay to know ex post whether they guessed correctly,

Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Indicators of effort
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Indicators of effort, include both the availability of detailed information about the horses and self reported use of variable information in making their guess

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
After choosing the winner at each session participants will revealing their willingness to pay. After all the sessions are done we will randomly select one of the sessions and play Becker-DeGroot-Marschak auction. In this auction, participants give a bid of a whole number, which represents the price they are willing to give in order to know the result of this round. The bid is compared to a price determined by a random number generator. If the their bid is greater than or equal to the price, he or she pays the price given by the number generator and will know the result at the end of session.
Experimental Design Details
After 20 sessions of guessing winners of horse races, we will inform participants of how much they have won based on one randomly selected race. After each selection is made, we will use a Becker-DeGroot-Marschak auction to elicit willingness to pay to know the outcome of that individual race, with the information being provided only after all selections have been made. In this auction, participants give a bid of a whole number, which represents the price they are willing to give in order to know the result of this round. The bid is compared to a price determined by a random number generator. If their bid is greater than or equal to the price, he or she pays the price given by the number generator and will know the result at the end of session.

Participants will be placed in two treatments. The first will provide only information about the number and name of the horse. The second will additionally provide information on the name and the age of the horse, jockeys' names and their weight, trainers' and owners' names, and the win odds.
Randomization Method
Treatment randomization is done at each session by Qualtrics (survey software).
Randomization Unit
Randomization will be done for each session for each individual.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
150 participants with 20 sessions each
Sample size: planned number of observations
3000
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
1500 each treatment (assuming uniform distribution)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
This study has 80.0% power to detect an effect size of E = S * E/S = 0.027. Given the following information alpha - 0.5 beta - .2 St.Dev - 0.26 (based on pilot info) N1 - 1500 N2 - 1500
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Cornell University Institutional Review Board for Human Participants
IRB Approval Date
2018-02-06
IRB Approval Number
1412005193
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials