x

We are happy to announce that all trial registrations will now be issued DOIs (digital object identifiers). For more information, see here.
Export Facilitation through Improving Management
Last registered on August 14, 2019

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Export Facilitation through Improving Management
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0003109
Initial registration date
June 26, 2018
Last updated
August 14, 2019 10:08 AM EDT
Location(s)

This section is unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
World Bank
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
LSE
PI Affiliation
World Bank
Additional Trial Information
Status
On going
Start date
2018-03-23
End date
2020-07-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Many developing country governments seek to improve the productivity and export competitiveness of their SME sectors. We will run a randomized experiment to test whether improving management practices can achieve these goals. A treatment group of 100 firms will receive a diagnostic, 190 hours of technical assistance, and then participate in a trade fair, while a control group of 100 firms will receive the diagnostic and trade fair only. Rich administrative data on export transactions will enable us to track whether this program leads to firms being more likely to export, diversifying what they export and where they export to, and improving export productivity.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Iacovone, Leonardo, David McKenzie and Rachael Meager. 2019. "Export Facilitation through Improving Management." AEA RCT Registry. August 14. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.3109-5.0
Former Citation
Iacovone, Leonardo, David McKenzie and Rachael Meager. 2019. "Export Facilitation through Improving Management." AEA RCT Registry. August 14. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/3109/history/51729
Sponsors & Partners

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
A treatment group of 100 firms will receive a diagnostic, 190 hours of technical assistance, and then participate in a trade fair, while a control group of 100 firms will receive the diagnostic and trade fair only
Intervention Start Date
2018-08-01
Intervention End Date
2019-06-28
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
Primary Hypothesis: The program will lead more firms to export, diversity the range of products exported and destinations exported to, and improve the export performance of participating firms.
This primary hypothesis will be measured through the following primary outcomes, all obtained from administrative data on export performance, where past year will denote the year from the start of the intervention phase onwards (anticipated to be the period August 2018-July 2019):
1. Extensive margin: Export at all in the past year: This is a binary variable, defined as one if the firm exports directly at all in the one year period since the intervention begins, and zero otherwise.
2. Number of Distinct Products Exported in the past year: The number of different product categories exported in the past year, using the 6-digit product classification in the harmonized system for the Andean Community. This will be coded as zero for firms that do not export, and will be winsorized at the 99th percentile.
3. Number of Different Countries Exported to in the past year. The number of different countries the firm exported to in the past year, coded as zero for firms that do not export, and winsorized at the 99th percentile.
4. Number of Distinct Product-Country Combinations Exported in the past year: This counts the number of product-country combinations a firm exported to in the past year, coded as zero for firms that do not export, and winsorized at the 99th percentile.
5. Export innovation (new product-country combination): This is a binary variable coded as one if the firm exported to a product-country pair that they had not exported to at all in the past three years, and zero otherwise. Coded as zero for firms that do not export.
6. Inverse Hyperbolic Sine of Total Export Value in the past year. This takes the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation (log(y+(y2+1)1/2) of total exports (measured in US dollars), and is coded as zero for firms that do not export.
7. Inverse Hyperbolic Since of Export Labor Productivity: This is the inverse hyperbolic sine of the ratio of total export value in the past year (measured in US dollars) to the average number of workers used in the past year (obtained from the PILA database, which has monthly data on formal workers). This is coded as zero for firms that do not export, and winsorized at the 99th percentile.
8. A standardized export outcomes index: This index will be calculated as the average of the normalized z-scores of outcomes 1 through 7, where each z-score is defined by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation of the respective outcome.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1. Proportion of Export-Specific Management Practices Being Used
2. Proportion of General Management Practices Being Used
1. Energy efficiency
2. Production costs index
3. Labor productivity
4. Total factor productivity
1. Employment:
2. Inverse hyperbolic sine of annual revenue
3. Inverse hyperbolic sine of annual profits
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
See registered report/pre-analysis plan
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
The sample consists of the 200 firms that applied for the program, which are then randomly assigned to two groups of 100 firms each.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Public computer randomization (see above)
Randomization Unit
Firm
Was the treatment clustered?
No
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
200 firms
Sample size: planned number of observations
200 firms
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
100 control firms, 100 treatment firms
Time series data: monthly data on outcomes for first year after intervention.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
See pre-analysis plan/registered report
Supporting Documents and Materials

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
Analysis Plan

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information