Leadership Choice in Non-Routine Analytical Team Tasks - Lab-in-the-field Evidence
Last registered on December 11, 2018

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Leadership Choice in Non-Routine Analytical Team Tasks - Lab-in-the-field Evidence
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0003188
Initial registration date
July 31, 2018
Last updated
December 11, 2018 9:26 AM EST
Location(s)

This section is unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
Tilburg University
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
LMU Munich
PI Affiliation
LMU Munich
PI Affiliation
LMU Munich
PI Affiliation
LMU Munich
Additional Trial Information
Status
In development
Start date
2018-08-06
End date
2019-08-04
Secondary IDs
Abstract
In this study, we investigate the effect of leadership choice on team performance in non-routine, analytical team tasks. We use a lab-in-the-field setup in which groups of teams work on a non-routine analytical team task to analyze when leadership emerges. The task makes teams
face complex and novel problems, it is analytical and cognitively demanding as teams need to collect and recombine information which requires to think outside the box to succeed, and it is interactive as team members have to collaborate, discuss possible actions, and develop ideas jointly with their team members.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Englmaier, Florian et al. 2018. "Leadership Choice in Non-Routine Analytical Team Tasks - Lab-in-the-field Evidence." AEA RCT Registry. December 11. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/3188/history/38782
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
We implement three treatments, one control condition, one where leadership can be formed endogenously and one where we assign leadership exogenously to a team mebmer.
Intervention Start Date
2018-08-06
Intervention End Date
2019-08-04
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
Time until completion, completion rate at 60 minutes
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Number of hints taken, timing at which hints are taken, team member geo distance, team conversation contents, questionnaire answers
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
We conduct the experiment with our partner in a setting that resembles non-routine and analytical team tasks. Subjects are from the subject pool of the local lab. Treatments are randomized by day over the sampling period to avoid spillover between observations that we record at similar points in time. We record completion time, answers to questionnaire questions, several background characteristics and variables related to the task. Additionally, we record geo distances of players, as well as record their conversations (pending technical feasibility, which we evaluate in the week of July 30, before the start of collecting data).
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization by computer in office
Randomization Unit
Randomization was done by days
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
99 days
Sample size: planned number of observations
270-300 observations, corresponding to 810 to 900 subjects.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
90-100 observations per treatment arm.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
University of Munich, Department of Economics, Ethics Commission
IRB Approval Date
2016-02-03
IRB Approval Number
N/A