Back to History Current Version

An RCT to assess effectiveness of the in-home Growth Monitoring Tool (GroMoTo) in addressing chronic childhood undernutrition in Pakistan

Last registered on December 21, 2018

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
An RCT to assess effectiveness of the in-home Growth Monitoring Tool (GroMoTo) in addressing chronic childhood undernutrition in Pakistan
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0003248
Initial registration date
December 21, 2018

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 21, 2018, 11:18 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Lahore University of Management Sciences

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Information Technology University
PI Affiliation
Hitotsubashi University
PI Affiliation
IDinsight
PI Affiliation
Florida International University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2019-02-01
End date
2020-06-30
Secondary IDs
Abstract
We hypothesize that poor caregivers do not receive frequent and timely feedback on their child’s growth trajectory, which constrains their understanding of the relationship between different childcare inputs and growth. This is especially important for pockets of poverty where the majority of children may be short for their age i.e. the reference child that caregivers have (children from within their community) may also be stunted. Consequently, despite access to resources like information on optimal practices through public health information campaigns and nutrition counseling, caregivers typically do not translate this information into action by adjusting their inputs. Moreover, child development may come into focus only during the regular visits to their local clinic where such feedback can be sought, but these visits can be infrequent and irregular since clinics are often far away and ‘cost’ caregivers in time and money. According to the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2014 in Pakistan, only 4% of HHs in the lowest wealth quintile sought care for their children at a clinic (UNICEF & Sindh Bureau of Statistics, 2014). Another constraint – albeit not necessarily unrelated – could be limited attention to child growth in poor households with taxed attentional capacity (World Bank, 2015). We propose a potential solution - a flexible and low-cost in-home growth monitoring tool called GroMoTo, coupled with counseling and/or (labeled) cash transfer. Fink, et al. (2017) test a passive version of this in Zambia and find positive effects on growth among undernourished children.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Akram, Agha et al. 2018. "An RCT to assess effectiveness of the in-home Growth Monitoring Tool (GroMoTo) in addressing chronic childhood undernutrition in Pakistan." AEA RCT Registry. December 21. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.3248-1.0
Former Citation
Akram, Agha et al. 2018. "An RCT to assess effectiveness of the in-home Growth Monitoring Tool (GroMoTo) in addressing chronic childhood undernutrition in Pakistan." AEA RCT Registry. December 21. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/3248/history/39527
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention components are:

1. Standard nutrition counseling by community health worker (CHW).

2. Growth Monitoring Tool (GroMoTo): Once every month, the caregiver will be prompted to measure their child’s height (since the sample comprises very young children, the measurement will be a length measure done in supine position) and plot it on the growth chart (this growth-chart will be installed on a wall by the CHW during the first of these visits), with active assistance by the CHW. The CHW will then discuss the results with reference to the healthy norm.

3. Labeled cash transfer: Once every month, the CHW will hand out a fixed amount of cash to the caregiver, with suggestion on using it to buy nutritious food for their child.
Intervention Start Date
2019-02-20
Intervention End Date
2019-10-20

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Height-for-age Z-score; Weight-for-height Z-score
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We propose an open-label, 3-arm trial, with randomization at the household level. The three experimental arms are:

1. Standard nutrition counseling by community health worker: CHWs will conduct monthly home visits to provide information to the caregivers on infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices including consumption of safe drinking water.

2. Counseling + GroMoTo: At each monthly visit, the caregiver will be prompted to measure their child’s height (since the sample comprises very young children, the measurement will be a length measure done in supine position) and plot it on the growth chart (this growth-chart will be installed on a wall by the CHW during the first of these visits), with active assistance by the CHW. The CHW will then discuss the results with reference to the healthy norm, in addition to providing information on IYCF best practices including consumption of safe drinking water.

3. Counseling + GroMoTo + (labeled) Cash transfer: In addition to monitoring and counseling, at each monthly visit, the CHW will hand out a fixed amount of cash to the caregiver, with suggestion on using it to buy nutritious food for their child (hence, labeled cash transfer since suggestion is not enforceable in this context).
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
Household (with at least one child between age 6-24 months)
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
1,400 Households
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,400 Households
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
450 Households for each of the three experimental arms
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials