Back to History Current Version

Transport Subsidies and Job Matchmaking In South Africa

Last registered on June 19, 2014

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Transport Subsidies and Job Matchmaking In South Africa
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0000362
First published
June 19, 2014, 12:36 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
LSE

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
MIT

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2014-05-05
End date
2015-06-01
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Researchers are using a randomized evaluation to examine the impact of subsidizing transportation on job search activities and youth employment outcomes by providing prepaid bus tickets for two major public transportation systems, Rea Vaya and Metrobus, in South Africa. From the database of unemployed youth (between 18 and 30 years old) provided by the South African Department of Labor, researchers randomly invited 1,200 job seekers to participate in the program. The study consists of two treatment treatment groups, with individuals in the sample being randomly assigned to either a group receiving a conditional transport subsidy, an unconditional transport subsidy or a control group receiving no subsidy. Researchers will gather data through interviews with participants on job search activity, job history, and various socio-economic characteristics. They will also extract data from the two transport systems on travel patterns and transactions made using the cards provided to study participants.

Registration Citation

Citation
Banerjee, Abhijit and Sandra Sequeira. 2014. "Transport Subsidies and Job Matchmaking In South Africa." AEA RCT Registry. June 19. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.362-1.1
Former Citation
Banerjee, Abhijit and Sandra Sequeira. 2014. "Transport Subsidies and Job Matchmaking In South Africa." AEA RCT Registry. June 19. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/362/history/207110
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention consists of two treatment arms - a conditional transport subsidy and an unconditional transport subsidy.

Unconditional Transportation subsidy: 400 participants were offered a Rea Vaya smart card that can be used either on Rea Vaya transport services or as a debit card fulfilling cash transactions under $20 per day. Each participant also received a Metrobus transport card. The subsidy lasted for five months, and the total subsidy per month was 300 South African Rand (US$30).

Conditional Transport subsidy: 400 participants were offered a Rea Vaya smart card specially designed to only allow for use on Rea Vaya transport services. The cards were preloaded with the same amount of money as the Unconditional Transportation subsidy group. Each participant also received a Metrobus transport card.
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2014-06-02
Intervention End Date
2014-12-02

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Outcomes of interest include labour market participation, intensity of job search activity, behaviours and attitudes toward labour market, perceptions of labour market conditions, spending behaviour, travel patterns, labour market expectations.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Labour market participation- jobs obtained, intensity of job search activity - number of hours spent searching for work, number of opportunities pursued, interviews attended, hours spent travelling to seek work, amount spent on job search activity. Perceptions of labour market conditions- degree of knowledge about jobs available in different industries, knowledge on skills required for different jobs, perceptions of income earned in different jobs, travel patterns- where respondent has travelled to seek work. Labour market expectations- expectations of income respondent should earn given the industry they wish to enter and their skills proficiency. Spending behaviour- amount of subsidy spent on transportation for job search activity versus other purposes.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
From the database of unemployed youth (between 18 and 30 years old) provided by the South African Department of Labor, researchers randomly invited 1,200 job seekers to participate in the program.

Participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups at the start of the program:

Unconditional Transportation subsidy: 400 participants were offered a Rea Vaya smart card that can be used either on Rea Vaya transport services or as a debit card fulfilling cash transactions under $20 per day. Each participant also received a Metrobus transport card. The subsidy lasted for five months, and the total subsidy per month was 300 South African Rand (US$30).

Conditional Transport subsidy: 400 participants were offered a Rea Vaya smart card specially designed to only allow for use on Rea Vaya transport services. The cards were preloaded with the same amount of money as the Unconditional Transportation subsidy group. Each participant also received a Metrobus transport card.

Comparison group: 400 participants received the Rea Vaya Smartcard and the Metrobus transport card loaded with only one trip to incentivize them to utilize the smart cards for their travel. Cards were given to to comparison group members to ensure homogeneity in the data quality between treatment and comparison groups.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization using Excel Macro on office computer at survey site.
Randomization Unit
Individual level
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
n/a
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,200
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
400 Conditional subsidy, 400 unconditional subsidy, 400 comparison group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
MIT COUHES
IRB Approval Date
2013-12-19
IRB Approval Number
1311006023
IRB Name
University of Cape Town
IRB Approval Date
2013-11-01
IRB Approval Number
UCT/COM/290/2013
IRB Name
London School of Economics
IRB Approval Date
2013-12-09
IRB Approval Number
n/a

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Abstract
Youth unemployment remains extremely high throughout the developing world, at times coexisting with unmet demand for labour and high job turnover. We examine one possible explanation for this: spatial mismatches between jobs and job-seekers combined with high search costs can lead young job-seekers to have overly optimistic beliefs about their employment prospects. As a result, job-seekers under-search but also hold out for better jobs. Through a field experiment we find that reducing search costs through transport subsidies leads job-seekers to search more intensively and to adjust their beliefs in line with their search experience. When jobs fail to materialize immediately, job-seekers who believed that dropping CVs at prospective employers in the city centre was an effective search strategy become more impatient, they lower their reservation wage and they settle for low-paying jobs closer to home. This does not increase their likelihood of being employed, since nearby jobs are also scarce. These findings underscore both the importance and the complexity of the interaction between search costs and beliefs, and how they can lead to spatial and occupational mistargeting in the job search.

Citation
Abhijit Banerjee, Sandra Sequeira, Learning by searching: Spatial mismatches and imperfect information in Southern labor markets, Journal of Development Economics, Volume 164, 2023, 103111, ISSN 0304-3878, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103111. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387823000664) Abstract: Youth unemployment remains extremely high throughout the developing world, at times coexisting with unmet demand for labour and high job turnover. We examine one possible explanation for this: spatial mismatches between jobs and job-seekers combined with high search costs can lead young job-seekers to have overly optimistic beliefs about their employment prospects. As a result, job-seekers under-search but also hold out for better jobs. Through a field experiment we find that reducing search costs through transport subsidies leads job-seekers to search more intensively and to adjust their beliefs in line with their search experience. When jobs fail to materialize immediately, job-seekers who believed that dropping CVs at prospective employers in the city centre was an effective search strategy become more impatient, they lower their reservation wage and they settle for low-paying jobs closer to home. This does not increase their likelihood of being employed, since nearby jobs are also scarce. These findings underscore both the importance and the complexity of the interaction between search costs and beliefs, and how they can lead to spatial and occupational mistargeting in the job search. Keywords: Labour markets; Transport costs; Search costs; Transport subsidies

Reports & Other Materials