x

We are happy to announce that all trial registrations will now be issued DOIs (digital object identifiers). For more information, see here.
“Mentorship, Entrepreneurship, and Labor Market Opportunity in Saudi Arabia.”
Last registered on May 16, 2019

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
“Mentorship, Entrepreneurship, and Labor Market Opportunity in Saudi Arabia.”
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0003956
Initial registration date
February 28, 2019
Last updated
May 16, 2019 6:33 PM EDT
Location(s)

This section is unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
University of Chicago
Other Primary Investigator(s)
Additional Trial Information
Status
In development
Start date
2019-04-01
End date
2020-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
This study aims to understand the effect of a Mentoring Network on student and job seeker outcomes including employability, entrepreneurship, and well-being.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Gonzalez, Alessandra. 2019. "“Mentorship, Entrepreneurship, and Labor Market Opportunity in Saudi Arabia.”." AEA RCT Registry. May 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.3956-2.0
Former Citation
Gonzalez, Alessandra. 2019. "“Mentorship, Entrepreneurship, and Labor Market Opportunity in Saudi Arabia.”." AEA RCT Registry. May 16. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/3956/history/46626
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2019-04-01
Intervention End Date
2020-12-31
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
Whether students in the Mentoring Network, compared to those who were not selected into the Mentoring Network:
-Are more likely to be employed
-If already were employed are more likely to remain employed
-If had entrepreneurial aspirations are more likely to maintain those aspirations or start their own business
-If job seeker already owned their own business, if they are more likely to still have their business open after the period of the intervention.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
I expect mentees whose families attended the Mentoring Network event to have greater effects of the mentoring network (through a channel of family/household support of the mentoring relationship)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
Students and job-seekers will be recruited to a Mentoring Network through a baseline survey which has an information intervention to incentivize recruitment to the Network. Students who opt into the Network will be randomly selected into the Network and matched with a Mentor. Employment, entrepreneurship, and well-Being outcomes will be assessed through intermittent surveys in order to evaluate the impact of membership into a Mentoring Network on employment, entrepreneurship, and well-being outcomes.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization will be done in office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Randomization into the network and then assignment to a mentor will occur at the individual level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
We plan to recruit 1000 students or job seekers (500 male, 500 female) and 200 Mentors.
Sample size: planned number of observations
We hope to have 1000 students and 200 Mentors filling out baseline surveys, weekly meeting data for one year (52 short surveys), and outcomes surveys at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
We hope to have 500 students/job seekers in the Treatment group, 500 in Control; 150 Mentors in Treatment and 50 in Control.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Previous studies on mentoring ranged from 400 to 1150 participants needed to see a treatment effects of mentoring and with my previous experience in email recruitment, I plan to work with university partners to email information intervention surveys electronically to the entire student listserve and existing databases. If a standard 4% response rate is expected from email solicitations, we would need to email at least 29,000 students to obtain the required sample size to see a treatment effect. Luckily the universities I am working with have at least this many students enrolled and I expect to detect treatment effects through our recruitment efforts.
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
University of Chicago IRB
IRB Approval Date
2019-02-13
IRB Approval Number
IRB19-0087