Economic Valuation of Gun Control: Measuring Responsiveness to Economic Valuation Information

Last registered on March 31, 2019

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Economic Valuation of Gun Control: Measuring Responsiveness to Economic Valuation Information
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0004020
Initial registration date
March 25, 2019

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 31, 2019, 11:01 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Skidmore College

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Skidmore College

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2019-03-28
End date
2019-03-29
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Gun control is an issue that is at the center of U.S. politics. With increased attention on the topic of gun violence, there is a surge in academic literature surrounding the effectiveness of gun control. Despite the increase in literature devoted to gun control issues, little of this literature has studied the topic through an economic lens. A few studies have attempted to estimate the economic value of gun control, as has been done with many non-market goods. However, a review of the literature identified an important gap; to our knowledge there is currently no literature examining how effective the metrics used to value gun control are in altering people’s views or attitudes. This research seeks to determine how people’s views and attitudes towards gun regulation change when given information regarding the economic value of gun control. This study uses an experimental framework to determine whether citizens' exposure to valuation information might influence individual contribution to gun control advocacy group. The study is implemented with 250 participants through the use of MTurk. Participants are randomly assigned a treatment condition. The control group received a description of gun violence in the US, while the treatment group received a description of gun violence in the US in addition to information regarding the economic impact incurred due to gun violence. All participants were then given the opportunity to donate to a gun control advocacy group. Furthermore, willingness to be taxed for a policy that decreases gun violence was also measured.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Goff, Sandra and Hatoon Mushasha. 2019. "Economic Valuation of Gun Control: Measuring Responsiveness to Economic Valuation Information ." AEA RCT Registry. March 31. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.4020-1.0
Former Citation
Goff, Sandra and Hatoon Mushasha. 2019. "Economic Valuation of Gun Control: Measuring Responsiveness to Economic Valuation Information ." AEA RCT Registry. March 31. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/4020/history/44374
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2019-03-28
Intervention End Date
2019-03-29

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Donation behavior
Willingness to be taxed
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Donation behavior: whether or not participants donate to a gun control advocacy group and how that varies across treatment conditions.
Willingness to be taxed: weather or not participants indicate willingness to be taxed to support a policy that would decrease gun violence by a certain percentage.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study will recruit 250 participants through the use of Amazon Mechanical Turk. Participants will be randomly given a treatment condition. Upon reading the description of gun violence in the US, in addition to economic valuation information participants will report donation behavior to gun control advocacy group and willingness to be taxed in support of a policy that will reduce gun violence.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization tool in survey software hosted in Qualtrics.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
250 participants
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
125 participants in the control group
125 participants in the treatment group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Skidmore College
IRB Approval Date
2019-03-15
IRB Approval Number
1903-797
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials