Back to History Current Version

Gender Transformative Programming to Improve Capabilities of Young Adolescents in Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Control Trial

Last registered on March 23, 2019

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Gender Transformative Programming to Improve Capabilities of Young Adolescents in Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Control Trial
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0004024
Initial registration date
March 20, 2019

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 23, 2019, 8:25 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
George Washington University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Overseas Development Institute
PI Affiliation
Addis Ababa University
PI Affiliation
Overseas Development Institute
PI Affiliation
University of Oklahoma

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2019-03-22
End date
2024-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Unequal gender norms and power dynamics are often driven and reinforced by adolescent girls’ male peers, families, communities, and the broader institutional structures that surround them. Without change in gender attitudes and norms at each of these levels, improved outcomes for key transitions are much less likely to be sustained. Efforts to nurture change must also acknowledge that adolescents’ opportunities and capabilities are shaped by complex, intersectional forces including ethnicity, caste, religion, and disability, among others. This multi-arm randomized control trial aims to improve the evidence base on effective approaches to improve multi-sectoral outcomes for girls across the following domains from the Gender and Adolescence: Global Evidence (GAGE) framework: education and learning; health, nutrition and sexual and reproductive health; bodily integrity; psychosocial well-being; voice and agency; and economic empowerment.

Specifically, the trial has four goals:

1) To evaluate the impact of Act With Her in Ethiopia (AWH-E) - a gender-transformative multi-level program - on young adolescent girls’ and boys’ capabilities (11-13) in the short- and long-run across the six GAGE capability domains using a multi-arm cluster randomized control trial across two regions (Amhara and Oromia).

2) To compare the impact of AWH-E to a more basic gender-synchronized program (AWH-E without community engagement and systems strengthening), a standalone girls’ group program (Her Spaces), and the gender-transformative program with economic support (AWH-E + Asset Transfers) on young adolescent capability achievements and transitions in the short- and longer- terms across two regions (Amhara and Oromia).

3) To evaluate the impact of AWH-E on young adolescent capability achievements and transitions in the short- and long- term in pastoralist contexts (Afar).

4) To use mixed-methods research to understand the mechanisms driving the impact, and in particular what works, for whom, and why.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Baird, Sarah et al. 2019. "Gender Transformative Programming to Improve Capabilities of Young Adolescents in Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Control Trial." AEA RCT Registry. March 23. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.4024-1.0
Former Citation
Baird, Sarah et al. 2019. "Gender Transformative Programming to Improve Capabilities of Young Adolescents in Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Control Trial." AEA RCT Registry. March 23. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/4024/history/43997
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)

Intervention Arms:

1: Her Spaces, younger adolescents: Starts in year 1; intervention package with 11-13 year old girls for 10 months; standard parental and community engagement. All programming ends after 10 months.


2: Act with Her, younger adolescents, community systems strengthening: Starts in year 1; core intervention package with 10-13 year old girls and boys for 10 months; 6 dedicated sessions with parents; and community-level system strengthening up to 24 months.


3: Act with Her with community systems strengthening and asset transfer, younger adolescents: Starts in year 1; core intervention package with 10-13 year old girls and boys for 10 months; asset transfer for girls over 10 months; 6 dedicated sessions with parents; and community-level system strengthening up to 24 months.

4: Act with Her curriculum only, younger adolescents: Starts in year 1; core intervention package with 10-13 year old girls and boys for 10 months; 6 dedicated sessions with parents; does not include community-level systems strengthening. All programming ends after 10 months.
Intervention Start Date
2019-03-22
Intervention End Date
2021-04-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Primary and secondary outcomes at 8 and 20 months post-program start will be measured for adolescent girls across the six GAGE capability domains (education and learning; bodily integrity; health, nutrition and SRH; psychosocial well-being; voice and agency; and economic empowerment) and a set of cross-cutting themes. In addition, a number of outcomes in themes that cut across these capability domains (including attitudes, behaviors, and knowledge) will be measured at 8 and 20 months post-program start for adolescent boys also, as well as for their caregivers. Details of the specific outcomes can be found in the protocol (publication pending).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Will be outlined in in more detail in protocol (publication pending)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Primary and secondary outcomes at 8 and 20 months post-program start will be measured for adolescent girls across the six GAGE capability domains (education and learning; bodily integrity; health, nutrition and SRH; psychosocial well-being; voice and agency; and economic empowerment) and a set of cross-cutting themes. In addition, a number of outcomes in themes that cut across these capability domains (including attitudes, behaviors, and knowledge) will be measured at 8 and 20 months post-program start for adolescent boys also, as well as for their caregivers. Details of the specific outcomes can be found in the protocol (publication pending).
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Will be outlined in in more detail in protocol (publication pending)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Selection of Locations

Amhara and Oromia: Five woredas in South Gondar, Amhara (Ebenat, Lay Gayint, Libo Kemkem, Simada, and Tach Gayint) and five woredas in East Hararghe, Oromia (Fadis, Babile, Jarso, Haramaya and Gursum) were purposely sampled for inclusion in the study.
These two zones were selected based on food insecurity status and high rates of child marriage (especially among the 10-14 age bracket), as a proxy of conservative gender norms and relatively less programming on child marriage. Within these 10 woredas, kebeles were characterized into three groups: (i) unsafe for data collection and programming, (ii) marginalized (lack of programming, isolated from key services and road/transport infrastructure) and (iii) less-marginalized (in terms of access to services and to the main woreda town). Locations identified by local officials as characterized by high security concerns were excluded from consideration.

Afar: In Afar, all five woredas (Dalifage, Dewe, Hadelela, Semurobi, and Telalak) in Zone 5 were selected for inclusion in the study. Zone 5 was chosen because of its relative marginalization within the Afar region - in terms of poor infrastructure (including distance from main roads to Semera, Tigray and Djoubti), high proportion of households who migrate seasonally, weak political representation (due to distance from Semeara the regional capital and less politically influential clans) and very low education rates, limited economic opportunities (e.g. distance from the salt mines and trading routes with Tigray region which other Zones enjoy) as well as ethnic tensions.

Randomization

Amhara and Oromia: Prior to the start of baseline data collection, the 155 kebeles were block randomized (by woreda, and kebele marginalization status) into control and four hypothetical treatment arms (the specific arms were not known at the time of this initial randomization). Within each of these blocks, the first kebele listed was the control, and then the four treatment arms after that (Her Spaces, Act with Her, Act With Her (curriculum only), and Act With Her + Assets). In almost all kebeles there was one extra kebele that was assigned control.



Afar: These 20 kebeles were organized into 10 blocks (by woreda and kebele marginalization status). Each block contained two kebeles. At the time of baseline data collection, there was no indication that interventions would take place in Afar. As soon as we learned that AWH would operate in Afar, we randomly allocated one of each pair to treatment and one to control. Within each of these blocks, the first kebele listed was the control, the next as Act With Her, then control again, and so on.


Adolescent inclusion and exclusion criteria: All sites

The listing exercise in each location sought to identify all adolescent boys and girls in the household aged 10-12 years old (at the time of listing). If the household had more than one individual in this age range, one adolescent was randomly selected for study eligibility.

It is worth noting that GAGE baseline data collection took place in 2017 prior to the trial start date as part of the broader GAGE longitudinal data collection. While there was an aspiration for an eventual RCT, this original data collection was done in the absence of a planned trial. This trial will utilize these sites and the 2017 data as its baseline.

Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization was done in the office using Microsoft Excel
Randomization Unit
The unit of randomization was a community (kebele). Randomization was blocked on woreda (one level up from Kebele) and marginalization status.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Amhara and Oromia: 155 Kebeles in 10 Woredas

Afar: 20 Kebeles in 5 Woredas
Sample size: planned number of observations
Amhara and Oromia: 2,303 adolescent girls and 1,697 adolescent boys Afar: 298 adolescent girls and 220 adolescent boys
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Amhara/Oromia: minimum of 29 clusters per arm



Afar: 10 clusters per arm
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Power Amhara/Oromia: We focus our power calculations on girls only, and on pair-wise comparisons between one treatment arm and control or between two treatment arms. Any comparison that combines one or more arms will have increased power, as will comparisons that include both boys and girls. Assuming power of 80%, 29 kebeles per-arm, 15 girls per community, an alpha level of 0.05, an intra-cluster correlation of 0.05, and a coefficient of variation of cluster size of 0.5, our minimum detectable effect size is 0.27 – a small to medium effect size. For boys only, where we have 11 boys per cluster, our minimum detectable effect size is 0.29, also a small to medium effect size. Power Afar: We focus our power calculations on girls only, and on pair-wise comparisons between one treatment arm and control. Any comparison that includes both boys and girls will have higher power. Assuming power of 80%, 10 kebeles per-arm, 15 girls per community, an alpha level of 0.05, an intra-cluster correlation of 0.05, and a coefficient of variation of cluster size of 0.5, our minimum detectable effect size is 0.47 – a medium effect size. For boys only, where we have 11 boys per cluster, our minimum detectable effect size is 0.51, also a medium effect size.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Addis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences, IRB
IRB Approval Date
2017-12-24
IRB Approval Number
113/17/Ext
IRB Name
Ethiopian Development Research Institute
IRB Approval Date
2017-09-18
IRB Approval Number
EDRI/DP/00689/10
IRB Name
ODI Research Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2017-05-11
IRB Approval Number
02438
IRB Name
George Washington University Committee on Human Research, Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2017-07-31
IRB Approval Number
071721
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents