Back to History Current Version

How effective are computer-based teacher training programs? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in El Salvador

Last registered on April 17, 2019

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
How effective are computer-based teacher training programs? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in El Salvador
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0004092
Initial registration date
April 11, 2019

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 17, 2019, 8:19 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Bern

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Bern
PI Affiliation
University of Bern
PI Affiliation
University of Bern
PI Affiliation
University of Bern
PI Affiliation
University of Bern

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2019-03-11
End date
2019-09-06
Secondary IDs
Abstract
This research builds on a pre-study that assessed the content knowledge in mathematics of a representative sample of primary school teachers in Morazan, El Salvador. The results of the pre-study show that the average math teacher scores less than 50% correct answers on an exam covering the official mathematics curriculum for second to sixth graders, i.e. the material they are supposed to teach. This randomized controlled trial aims at evaluating whether and to what extent the content knowledge of primary school teachers can be improved during a 5 months in-service teacher training. The teacher training program evaluated in this trial has two elements: 1) Self-studying using a computer-assisted learning software, and 2) participation in four workshops where the material covered in the self-study modules is recapped and discussed together with expert teachers. Importantly, both the software-based self-studying and the attendance in workshops are incentivized, meaning that the participants get compensated for each computer-assisted learning module they successfully complete as well as for their attendance in the monthly workshops.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Brunetti, Aymo et al. 2019. "How effective are computer-based teacher training programs? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in El Salvador." AEA RCT Registry. April 17. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.4092-1.0
Former Citation
Brunetti, Aymo et al. 2019. "How effective are computer-based teacher training programs? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in El Salvador." AEA RCT Registry. April 17. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/4092/history/45102
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention is an in-service teacher training program implemented by the NGO Consciente. It targets voluntarily participating primary school teachers that teach basic math to students of grades 3 to 6.

The teacher training program has two elements: 1) Self-studying using computer-assisted learning software, and 2) participation in four workshops where the material covered in the self-study modules is recapped and discussed together with expert teachers.

Importantly, both the self-studying and the attendance in workshops are incentivized, meaning that the participants get compensated for each computer-assisted learning module they successfully complete as well as for their attendance in the monthly workshops.
Intervention Start Date
2019-04-11
Intervention End Date
2019-08-23

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Math skills of primary school teachers measured via pencil and paper assessments covering the local curriculum of grades 2 -- 6.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Starting point are all primary schools in Morazan, excluding the 50 smallest schools with only one or two teachers covering grades 3--6. The NGO sent out invitations to all eligible teachers in these schools, who were asked to register via telephone, internet or filling out a registration form.

Based on these registrations the applicants were invited to an information meeting in March 2019, where an unannounced baseline math assessment was conducted. Some of the applicants took exactly the same assessment during a representative survey in September 2018 (about 6 months before), and therefore only completed the registration and received additional information about the program.

Based on the baseline assessments, the worst performing applicant of every school was selected; applicants were informed that participation in the March-meeting did not guarantee admission to the program, but the pre-selection criteria were not communicated to them. Following this procedure 175 teachers from 175 different schools across Morazan remained in the sample.

Stratifying on baseline scores and teacher gender, the 175 teachers were randomly assigned to the either the control or treatment group. This gives 87 teachers that participate in the program and 88 teachers constituting the control group.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in the office using Stata (Version 14.0/SE).
Randomization Unit
We randomize on the teacher level stratifying on their gender and baseline score. However, the pre-selection based on the baseline score leaves only one teacher per school in the sample.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
175 teachers (and schools)
Sample size: planned number of observations
88 teachers (and schools) in the control group, 87 teachers (and schools) in the treatment group.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
88 teachers (and schools) in the control group, 87 teachers (and schools) in the treatment group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
MDE = 0.2--0.27 standard deviations. Calculations based on formula by Bloom (2007) and the following parameter values: power=80%; alpha (level of significance)=0.1; R-squared : 0.5--0.7; P (share of control units)=0.5; n (total observations)=175
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Ethikkommission der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Bern
IRB Approval Date
2019-03-28
IRB Approval Number
052019

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials