Experimental Design Details
Research in psychology posits that individuals have multiple identities centered around the different social roles they occupy, and that their behavior at a given time may depend on which identity is dominant (Akerlof and Kranton, 2000). Priming interventions can cause a particular identity to become more salient, altering an individual's values and desires and, thus, his or her economic decisions (Benjamin et al, 2010). This study examines how the profit-maximizing strategic decisions of startups are constrained by the personal motivations of their utility-maximizing founders. In a novel experimental approach that integrates psychology, economics, and strategy research, we apply priming techniques to study entrepreneurial decision-making. In two experiments, we prime entrepreneurs' "entrepreneurial identity" through a survey mechanism. Entrepreneurs are randomly distributed either the priming or the control version of the survey. The priming questionnaire asks four questions about their startup strategy (e.g., "What is your exit strategy?"), while the control questionnaire asks four questions about their work-life balance (e.g., "Whom do you typically spend leisure time with?").
Experiment 1 (Manipulation Check): The purpose of the first experiment is to verify that our priming intervention does increase "entrepreneurial identity." Our sample for the first experiment consists of 90 entrepreneurs recruited through Qualtrics Online Samples, and we screen out those who have companies older than 5 years. After answering the priming or control questions, both priming and control groups complete a word-choice test to measure the dominance of their entrepreneurial identities. Subjects are asked to choose the word that best describes them from a series of ten word pairs. In each pair, one word is entrepreneurial (i.e., "innovative") and one is not (i.e., "generous"). We expect that the priming group will have a higher average of entrepreneurial words selected. We also use this first experiment as an opportunity to test the hypothetical scenario questions described below, and we intend to use the experimental results from this study for our power calculations.
Experiment 2 (Main Experiment): Our main sample is drawn from a population of entrepreneurs who have registered for a free online class that will be taught by one of us. Entrepreneurs are asked to complete a 10-minute registration form with questions about their personal and startup backgrounds. We screen our registrants to select growth-driven startups that are not more than 5 years old. Several weeks after registering for the class, subjects are requested to complete a pre-class survey. The pre-class survey is again either the priming or control condition, consisting of the same priming or control questions, followed by questions about how the subject would behave in the following hypothetical scenarios. We designed these questions to specify a trade-off between startup growth and personal utility:
A. A major Silicon Valley venture capital firm has contacted you to express interest in investing in your startup. The firm has a history of partnerships with numerous highly-successful companies, and Series A investments in its partners are typically around $5 million. However, the firm only invests in startups that are located in Silicon Valley. How likely would you be to decide to move to Silicon Valley?
B. For the last month, you have been employing a close relative to do part-time work for your startup. However, the quality of their work is below expectations, often requiring you to spend extra time correcting their errors. You have spoken to the relative regarding your concerns, but the errors still continue. How likely would you be to fire your relative?
C. You have planned a long vacation to spend some quality time with your family and/or your closest friends, but you have just been invited to a special event where you will have the opportunity to network with numerous potential investors. This event is going to be held during the time you had planned to be on vacation. How likely would you be to cancel your vacation?
D. Your startup has the opportunity to make an investment that may greatly increase growth in the future. In order to finance the investment, you would have to nearly drain your own retirement savings. How likely would you be to make the investment?
We examine the discrepancy between the priming and control groups to elucidate how personal costs constrain strategic decision-making.
Prior to this trial registration, we conducted a pilot on a sample of 12 entrepreneurs recruited through Qualtrics Online Samples (a different sample than the one that will be used in the manipulation check described above). The data and R scripts used are attached to this trial registration.