Information Provision and Court Performance: Experimental Evidence from Chile
Last registered on June 17, 2021

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Information Provision and Court Performance: Experimental Evidence from Chile
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0005512
Initial registration date
December 06, 2020
Last updated
June 17, 2021 4:42 AM EDT
Location(s)
Region
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
Toulouse School of Economics
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
IAST/ Toulouse School of Economics
PI Affiliation
University of California, Los Angeles
PI Affiliation
World Bank
Additional Trial Information
Status
In development
Start date
2020-01-01
End date
2021-09-30
Secondary IDs
H43, D63
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that behavioral nudges can be a cost-effective tool to influence changes in people’s actions. In this study, we aim to test whether nudging court managers through informing them on how their court performs in absolute and relative terms can improve court productivity. Moreover, we test if there is any difference if the information about the court performance is given in contrast and relation to self past performance or if the information is relative to other courts' performance.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Carrillo, Paloma et al. 2021. "Information Provision and Court Performance: Experimental Evidence from Chile." AEA RCT Registry. June 17. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.5512-1.1.
Sponsors & Partners

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
In this study, we aim to test whether nudging court managers through informing them on how their court performs in absolute and relative terms can improve court productivity.
Intervention Start Date
2020-12-14
Intervention End Date
2021-09-30
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
Case clearance rate, average length for filing cases (days), average length for ending cases, the average time the court needs to provide a written submission during the consultation period, percentage of writing resolved with 3-5 days, average number of days to program a hearing, percentage of hearing that started with a delay of 15 minutes, percentage of cases pending for more than 1-2 years, appeal rate, and number of cases appealed.

On the promotion intervention, the main primary outcome is number of logins per court manager to the Quantum platform
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Court managers job satisfaction
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
The court managers' job satisfaction level will be taken from the pre and post-surveys to court managers that measure perceptions of their tribunals and their satisfaction with their positions. By informing the court managers about their court's standing it could change how empowered or satisfied a court manager is with his or her position and power role.
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
The program will have six distinct treatments. The treatments will combine promoting the usage of an electronic platform that contains information on their court performance and providing distinct homepages in this platform that will summarize the courts performance stressing the weaknesses and strengths of the court in comparison to a reference group.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
The unit of randomization is the court. The randomization was stratified by size (small and big) and court type (7 distinct ones).
Was the treatment clustered?
No
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
346 courts
Sample size: planned number of observations
346 courts
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
57 courts stay as control, 57 courts receive T1, 58 courts receive T2, 58 courts receive T3, 58 courts receive T4, and 58 courts receive T5.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
Toulouse School of Economics
IRB Approval Date
2020-01-18
IRB Approval Number
N/A