Solving the 2 Sigma Problem with Khan Academy: A Pilot Study

Last registered on July 21, 2020

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Solving the 2 Sigma Problem with Khan Academy: A Pilot Study
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0006167
Initial registration date
July 17, 2020

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 21, 2020, 11:40 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Toronto

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Brigham Young University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2020-08-17
End date
2021-08-24
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Computer Assisted Learning (CAL) is educational software designed to help students progress through material at their own pace while receiving feedback and advice, similar to the kind that a tutor might provide but on a computer. CAL also makes it easier for teachers to monitor and grade progress. Teachers can assign new topics based on each students’ level of understanding. Despite a large and increasing body of convincing research suggesting large benefits of adopting CAL, many administrators and teachers still shy away. Uncertainty about how to use the software, concerns about subscription costs, and lack of support may explain this reluctance. This pilot aims to develop and test a program that simplifies the adoption of CAL and helps ensure its effective use. The pilot uses Khan Academy (KA), one of the most popular CAL programs, as a tool for Grades 3-8 math teachers to use in class and as graded homework. The program has the potential to save time for teachers, lower costs, and offer a more customizable, enjoyable, and effective learning experience for students. The goal of the pilot is to work out design details for maximizing engagement and simplifying usage. The overall goal is to provide convincing evidence for policy makers, administrators, and teachers to want to adopt the program on a state-wide or national scale.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Oreopoulos, Philip and Joseph Price. 2020. "Solving the 2 Sigma Problem with Khan Academy: A Pilot Study." AEA RCT Registry. July 21. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.6167-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
We propose to pilot a program that provides training and support for teachers to use KA effectively in Grades 3-8 mathematics. We chose mathematics because previous research (cited above) finds CAL can be particularly effective with this subject. We chose Grades 3-8 because KA’s resources for these levels are particularly well developed. The pilot program has the potential to save time for teachers and offer a free, more customizable, enjoyable, and effective learning experience for students. The pilot would help determine best practices for the implementation of a larger randomized controlled trial. Qualitative and quantitative analyses would be used to identify key implementation challenges and solutions, whether classes are provided online or in-person. If a sufficiently large number of classes participate, we will also implement the study as its own randomized controlled trial.
Intervention (Hidden)
The program uses Khan Academy to facilitate group-level and individual-level instruction. This occurs from assigning students both weekly and end-of-term mastery goals.

With respect to weekly goals, Khoaches will work with teachers and Utah curriculum guidelines to align weekly KA assignments with the material that teachers want to cover at the classroom level. Assignments include instructional videos, exercises and quizzes associated with the unit/material being covered. Exercises will be graded based on being attempted and attaining ‘familiar’, ‘proficient’, or ‘mastered’ achievement levels. Quizzes will be graded based on the percent of questions scored correct. A student can take the quiz as many times as they like, with the final score recorded at the due date.

Teachers also assign students a Mastery Goal, which corresponds to a students’ overall percent proficiency in a set of material. Students can receive the same Mastery Goal, or a customized goal based on remedial or advanced needs. Students are expected to spend about 2 hours a week working on their weekly KA assignments and progress with their mastery goal. Teachers will review individual student progress periodically and adjust student mastery goals accordingly. Students are graded based on percent of goals mastered (corresponding roughly to attaining at least 80 percent of material correct).

The combination of assignment and mastery goals allows students to receive group instruction on core grade level material, individual instruction for struggling students to work on remedial material or spend more time on current material, and individual instruction for more advanced students to work on more challenging material. Teachers review individual student progress periodically and agree with students on a plan for progress, including possibly adjusting mastery goals.

The program allows for flexibility by letting teachers choose KA assignments and mastery goals. Teachers can also choose how they wish to incorporate KA during class, or as extra review. Previous research suggests using Khan as mandatory homework, with the possibility of completing this homework in class or at school, is the most promising approach for leading to a high degree of participation and effectiveness. Teachers can easily monitor progress using the KA dashboard and update their classroom instruction based on satisfactory or unsatisfactory performance on KA assignments.

Some details of the program depend on the state of instruction in the 2020/21 school year. If classes remain online, teachers face additional challenges with keeping students engaged and offering individual feedback. To help address this, Khoaches will offer virtual check-in meetings with individual students not using KA regularly. These check-ins will also facilitate a qualitative analysis of the challenges students face in using KA from home. The number of students targeted for this service and the frequency of the meetings will depend on the total sample of classrooms. The main goal is to better understand design details for helping teachers and students benefit the most from the program.

Another possible add-on for increasing engagement is to send reminders and feedback to students and parents. Past research suggests sending messages about attendance and homework completion can increase achievement. We will work with teachers and school administrators to test an add-on text-based communication program to increase KA engagement.

The sample would be obtained from Utah. In the past, we have worked with schools in the Alpine, Granite, Nebo, Ogden, Provo, Washington, and Weber school districts. At a minimum, we would pilot the study in at least one school with 5-10 classrooms in Grades 3-8, located in a disadvantaged neighborhood. We aim to recruit 10 or more schools with 8-10 classrooms across each school so that we can randomize the program across classrooms.

With principal or superintendent encouragement, teachers would be invited to participate. With a sufficiently large number of classrooms, approximately half would be selected into ‘Group 1’ and the other half into ‘Group 2’. If selected into the study’s ‘Group 1’, volunteer math teachers would complete the 4-hour ‘Khan for Educators Course’ before classes begin and agree to incorporate KA systematically in their class for the first term (until students complete their first assessment). At the end of first term, Group 1 teachers would have the option of whether they want to continue working with Khan or not. Those selected into ‘Group 2’ would have the option of incorporating KA in second term.

Group 1 teachers would also work with assigned coaches (‘Khoaches’) who would offer personal support at the beginning of and during the school year. They will do so remotely via phone, email, or video call unless JPAL and Utah guidelines both deem meeting in person is acceptable.
Khoaches are key to the pilot for helping learn potential challenges to the program’s design and potential solutions. Group 2 teachers will instead receive Khoach support via group meetings or email, which would mimic more closely a scalable program that does not include more intensive personal communication.

Parents of Group 1 and Group 2 would be sent an information sheet about the program with either opt-in or opt-out consent, depending on what our Ethics Review Board and Utah School Districts allow. Both of these approaches that we have used in the past have worked adequately well. Opt-in would also allow for collecting additional survey data and possibly parental text numbers to use for reminders and support.

Intervention Start Date
2020-08-24
Intervention End Date
2021-06-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Intermediate outcomes will come from class attendance and grade records. We will also use usage data from Khan Academy. A support letter from them is attached. We will also match students to their standardized math achievement scores from the Utah Performance Assessment System (U-Pass). Qualitative data would be collected on student/teacher/parent experiences and feedback from administrators about the program.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Randomized at the classroom or grade level. Treatment group receives program in the Fall, 2020, control group receives it in the Spring, 2021.
Experimental Design Details
Since our analysis uses clusters within school and grade and includes covariates, we assume an intraclass correlation of 0.15. Further assuming 20 students per class, 76 classes would be needed to attain 80 percent statistical power at a 5 percent significance level. Therefore, we would need about 8 schools, with 10 classrooms per school to have adequate statistical power for conducting an experiment during the pilot. We would need about 5 schools if we instead assume 70 percent statistical power to detect at least a 20 percent standard deviation effect with an intraclass correlation of 0.1.
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer (using STATA).
Randomization Unit
Class or grade-level.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
10 schools, 10 classes each, for a total of 100 classes.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Assuming 20 students per class, target sample size is about 2,000 students.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
50 classes treated, 50 contol.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Hedges and Hedberg (2007) reports intraclass correlation coefficients across schools of about 0.20 without covariates and about 0.15 with covariates. Since our analysis uses clusters within school and grade and includes covariates, we assume an intraclass correlation of 0.15. Further assuming 20 students per class, 76 classes would be needed to attain 80 percent statistical power at a 5 percent significance level. Therefore, we would need about 8 schools, with 10 classrooms per school to have adequate statistical power for conducting an experiment during the pilot. We would need about 5 schools if we instead assume 70 percent statistical power to detect at least a 20 percent standard deviation effect with an intraclass correlation of 0.1.
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials