Discrimination as a Barrier to Growth: Experimental Evidence from Ethiopia

Last registered on March 07, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Discrimination as a Barrier to Growth: Experimental Evidence from Ethiopia
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0006518
Initial registration date
September 23, 2020

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
September 24, 2020, 7:35 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
March 07, 2024, 4:48 PM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
UC Merced

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2019-10-01
End date
2022-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Gender discrimination against entrepreneurs, who form the largest sector of the labor force in Sub-Saharan Africa, may drive gender gaps in access to capital and subsequently reduce the performance of female-owned businesses. Observable differences between men and women entrepreneurs explain only a small portion of the “gender profit gap”, suggesting gender discrimination may be an important, yet understudied, factor inhibiting the success of female entrepreneurship.1 This raises concerns about gender equity, but also growth: by misallocating capital, discrimination can reduce the returns to capital and thereby reduce productivity and economic growth. Thus, there may be an opportunity to both increase gender equity and improve efficiency in the allocation of capital.

In our paper, we use a randomized experiment to identify whether Ethiopian financial providers discriminate against female entrepreneurs when evaluating their business’ productivity. To identify the extent and implications of gender discrimination in capital access, we implement a business plan competition in which entrepreneurs are evaluated by a representative panel of 200 financial providers. To estimate discrimination, we randomly assign the entrepreneur to be presented as female or male. Our paper will answer whether financial providers discriminate against female entrepreneurs, the largest segment of the labor force, reducing gender equity?
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Ayalew, Shibiru, Shanthi Manian and Ketki Sheth. 2024. "Discrimination as a Barrier to Growth: Experimental Evidence from Ethiopia." AEA RCT Registry. March 07. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.6518-1.4
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
To identify the extent and implications of gender discrimination in capital access, we implement a business plan competition in which entrepreneurs are evaluated by a representative panel of 200 financial providers. To estimate discrimination, we randomly assign the entrepreneur to be presented as female or male.
Intervention Start Date
2020-09-01
Intervention End Date
2020-11-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
For the evaluation of businesses, our primary outcomes are the evaluator's Final Score and Predicted Profits (both with and without providing additional capital to the business) for the business.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Final Score refers to the score given to the business in the competition, and Predicted Profits is what the evaluator predicts the business' profits will be in January 2021.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
For the evaluation of businesses, our secondary outcomes are the evaluator's prediction of the business' survival, assets, and job creation in January 2021 with and without recieving additional capital, whether the evaluator recommended the business for a loan.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
To identify the extent and implications of gender discrimination in capital access, we implement a business plan competition in which entrepreneurs are evaluated by a representative panel of 200 financial providers. To estimate discrimination, we randomly assign the entrepreneur to be presented as female or male.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
judge-business
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
0
Sample size: planned number of observations
6000 (evaluations)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
approximately 3000 evaluations per treatment arm (perceived gender of applicant)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
UC Merced
IRB Approval Date
2019-10-07
IRB Approval Number
UCM2019-87
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Endline Survey Analysis

MD5: 3ffb62e85d7f3900dd7861cf9b6b2948

SHA1: e5295cdd244c7d070f32a018822afbc769d82e9d

Uploaded At: September 30, 2021

Updated preanalysis plan

MD5: e16886526c74c317d27d9ff4dc4c2a63

SHA1: 8c292e89697ad97f83f9de383eee2228cc4c3948

Uploaded At: April 09, 2021

updated preanalysis plan

MD5: 4fb9851ba2f52ad703f2340afdb13c43

SHA1: ea2814f0732182c43c45c5b32c76800b47ad861c

Uploaded At: April 09, 2021

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials