Back to History Current Version

Citizens against corruption

Last registered on November 18, 2020

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Citizens against corruption
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0006543
Initial registration date
November 17, 2020

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
November 18, 2020, 10:03 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Bordeaux

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
World Bank

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2020-10-31
End date
2021-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
This study is about a smartphone App which provides information on administrative processes to citizens in Burkina Faso. The App was designed to ease administrative tasks and shelter citizens against bribery and day-to-day corruption. We will randomize the access to the App within a pool of interested individuals recruited via Facebook and other channel, and will measure outcomes related to the administrative processes conducted by the participants, including bribery paid.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Hilger, Anne and Quentin Stoeffler. 2020. "Citizens against corruption." AEA RCT Registry. November 18. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.6543-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

Sponsors

Partner

Type
private_company
URL
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention is the free provision of a smartphone App which includes information on several administrative processes, such as obtaining a national identity card or a driving license, in Burkina Faso.
Intervention Start Date
2020-11-25
Intervention End Date
2021-04-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
- administrative tasks succeeded (#)
- time to complete administrative tasks (days)
- number of visits to administration per task (#)
- total cost paid to the administration per task
- bribery paid for administrative tasks (0/1)
- total bribery amount for administrative tasks (log, CFA)
- support of other individuals for administrative tasks (#)
- success from other individuals supported in administrative tasks (#)
- bribery paid by these individuals for administrative tasks (0/1)
- total bribery paid by these individuals for administrative tasks (log, CFA)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
- administrative tasks started (#)
- distance travelled per task (km)
- total other costs per task (transportation, etc.)
- support from peer for tasks (0/1)
- use of intermediary (0/1)
- initiation of bribery demand (0/1)
- reason for asking bribes
- perceived easiness and confidence during the administrative process (see below)
- bribery paid for other reasons (e.g. for trafic violation)
- time for administrative process for individuals helped with administrative tasks (days)
- total other bribery amount (e.g. for trafic violation) (log, CFA)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
- use of intermediary (as individuals receiving bribes: question 4.1k)
- initiation of bribery demand: question 4.1n
- reason for asking bribes: question 4.1o.
- perceived easiness and confidence during the administrative process: perceived on a scale from "very difficult" to "very easy" (question 4.1p) and "not comfortable at all" to "very comfortable" (question 4.1q); see questionnaire attached

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Access to the App was randomized at the individual level by the App provider (ONE).
Experimental Design Details
Access to the App was randomized at the individual level by the App provider (ONE). Participants were recruited by ONE from several sources. The main source is a Facebook forum which had been animated by ONE on the topic of corruption in Burkina Faso. Facebook group participants, as well as other Facebook users could register for the study via WhatsApp or SMS by providing their name and phone number. ONE also recruited participants among past participants of anti-corruption training that they had conducted among university students, and through a campaign in universities. Interested students could register in the same manner or by writing their contact information on a paper form. Among the pool of participants, the research team will randomly select half of the applicants for receiving the App, while the other half will remain in the control group.
Randomization Method
Randomization will be conducted in the office by the PI using a computer using the baseline survey data.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
There are no clusters
Sample size: planned number of observations
2,500
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
1250 individuals in the treatment group, 1250 individuals in the control group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Power calculations indicate a required sample of 2500 (1250 for each of the treatment and control arms) to reach a decrease in average bribery amounts by 25%.
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Comité d'éthique Institutionnel pour la recherche en sciences de la santé
IRB Approval Date
2020-11-05
IRB Approval Number
48-2020/CEIRES
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials