Pro-social or Career Motivated Politicians? Evidence from Village Elections in Pakistan
Last registered on November 02, 2015

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Pro-social or Career Motivated Politicians? Evidence from Village Elections in Pakistan
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0000685
Initial registration date
April 12, 2015
Last updated
November 02, 2015 1:20 PM EST
Location(s)
Region
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
Stanford University
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
UC Berkeley
Additional Trial Information
Status
On going
Start date
2015-04-06
End date
2016-08-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
In this project, we design three experiments that provide the first experimental evidence on 1) what motivates people to seek political office, 2) how certain types of people can be encouraged to become politicians, and 3) whether voters care to put certain types of politicians in office. In the first experiment, we examine the process of candidacy by randomizing at the individual level three factors that contribute to a citizens decision to seek political office: 1) expected benefits, by making salient private or prosocial benefits from seeking office, 2) costs, by providing a lawyer to help file papers, and 3) the probability of election, by polling the village and providing this information to prospective politicians. In the second experiment, we consider specific policy responses that can be used to help certain types of people, such as the non- elite, to seek office. We test to see if messages delivered through canvassing and/or training can encourage people to participate in politics by seeking office. In the final experiment, we examine if voters care about who runs for political office. We run a get-out-the-vote experiment that provides random village-level variation in turnout at the village level. We use this experiment as an instrument for turnout to study how characteristics of the elected council change when marginal voters vote.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Gulzar, Saad and Yasir Khan. 2015. "Pro-social or Career Motivated Politicians? Evidence from Village Elections in Pakistan." AEA RCT Registry. November 02. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/685/history/5867
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
1. Delivery of the salience of career and social benefits from running for political office through canvassing and training
2. Delivery of information regarding electability
3. Services of a lawyer to help with paper filing
Intervention Start Date
2015-04-07
Intervention End Date
2015-06-15
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
We will test outcomes at the training stage and the candidacy stage, where we obtain individual data through a primary survey, and at the voting stage, where we can use elections data at the village level to study voting behavior. Outcomes will include who shows up to the trainings? Who files papers? Who is declared a successful candidate? Who is voted into office? Measure of pro-sociality and career motivations at each level.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
We design a village level pilot experiment in 2 districts of KP, Pakistan. This involves the randomized roll out of social mobilizers to villages. Field activities will proceed as follows: a pair of social mobilizers will canvass the village with the aim of reaching about 50 households. They will prime the HHs on career, or social incentives to run for office and inform them about a training on local elections the following day. Then mobilizers will then compile a list of all the nominated people, and approach them to deliver individual level treatments.

The training will be organized in the village to make it accessible for everyone. The participants of the trainings will be explained the formal process of declaring candidacy for the village council elections. They will also be primed again on the career or social incentives of running for office. We aim to complete these activities before the official date of announcement of candidacies. After the declaration of the candidates we will send our teams to the same villages again to conduct in-depth surveys of people who have declared their candidacy for the village councils.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Done in office on a computer.
Randomization Unit
Villages and individuals
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
230 villages
Sample size: planned number of observations
1500 nominees, 8000 households
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
23 villages per the smallest treatment arms
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
University Committee on Activities Involving Human Subjects, NYU
IRB Approval Date
2015-04-06
IRB Approval Number
15-10593
IRB Name
Committee on the Use of Humans as Experimental Subjects, MIT
IRB Approval Date
2015-02-06
IRB Approval Number
1505692010
Post-Trial
Post Trial Information
Study Withdrawal
Intervention
Is the intervention completed?
No
Is data collection complete?
No
Data Publication
Data Publication
Is public data available?
No
Program Files
Program Files
Reports and Papers
Preliminary Reports
Relevant Papers