Last registered on December 02, 2021


Trial Information

General Information

Initial registration date
March 08, 2021

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 09, 2021, 6:21 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
December 02, 2021, 9:19 AM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.


Primary Investigator

EM Lyon Business School

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

In development
Start date
End date
Secondary IDs
C92, D87, D91, M54
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
We study the effect of stochastic rewards on workers' decisions to continue working.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Corgnet, Brice. 2021. "STOCHASTIC REWARDS AND WORK PERSISTENCE." AEA RCT Registry. December 02.
Experimental Details


Intervention Start Date
Intervention End Date

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Our primary outcome is the likelihood of quitting the work task depending on the various conditions.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This experiment is conducted online with subjects registered at the University of Nottingham.
This is a 2x2 factorial design with two dimensions and two levels per dimension. The first dimensions regards the uncertainty of rewards (certain or stochastic) and the use of an attention popup (present or absent).

All treatments use a real-effort task in which participants have to make summations of five one-digit numbers for up to 30 minutes. They can quit the task at any moment in time by clicking the corresponding button. After quitting the task, participants are not able to go back to the task screen and can terminate the experiment. Before the experiment ends, all subjects are asked questions about self-reported stress, attention to the task and enjoyment of the task. In addition, they are also administered the IMI (Intrinsic Motivation Inventory) questionnaire. In a companion trial, we independently measures subjects' cognitive skills (cognitive reflection and inhibitory control) along with their addiction to work/study (Bergen work addiction scale).

In the certain treatment (baseline), participants receive exactly 2 tokens per correct answer. In the stochastic treatment, the number of tokens received by participants for each correct summation follows a random pattern. The token value is an integer number between 1 and 23 with equal probability. The token value was drawn after each correct summation, and participants knew the stochastic process generating the token value. In all treatments, the reward is divided by an exchange rate equal to 1, 2, 4, 8, 80, and 500 in the six 5-minute periods of the experiment. The two treatments entail the same expected value for the rewards thus only differing on the dispersion of rewards.

The other dimension of the design varies the presence of a popup warning subjects of a change in the exchange rate. This second features implies that we conduct four treatments: certain (with and without an attention popup) and stochastic (with and without an attention popup).

In a fifth treatment, we ask subjects before starting the experiment whether they want to participant in the certain or stochastic treatment (without a popup). The rest of the experiment is the same as described above.

On September 15th 2021, we decided to add three new conditions to the study after observing the results of the previous conditions.
We have added a sixth treatment, which is the same as the fifth treatment but with a popup announcement.

We have also added two new conditions which are the same as the certain and stochastic treatments with the popup, except that no real-time feedback is provided to the participants on the adding task.

Because of COVID restrictions, the experiments cannot be conducted at the University of Nottingham. The study is thus conducted online via MTurk. Because our previous results were based on lab findings, power calculations was redone and so we need to recruit about 100 people per treatment instead of 70.

In December 2021, we also decided to contact the participants of the MTurk study that completed the four main treatments to administer them a questionnaire on gambling habits and attitudes. We also ask them to bet on lotteries with varying levels of entropy with and without feedback, following the design of a previous preregistered study (see here:
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Computerized random draws.
Randomization Unit
At the individual level.
Was the treatment clustered?

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
We aim at recruiting 70 subjects per treatment.
Sample size: planned number of observations
We aim at recruiting 70 subjects per treatment so 350 in total.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
n=70 by treatment
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
GATE-Lab Review Board for ethical standards in research
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents


MD5: e77ebbeca89ed967a5d3ba64dbc02210

SHA1: a9edff9bc81470ac31c9e7b98abe66f0766226e6

Uploaded At: March 01, 2021


Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information


Is the intervention completed?
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials