Anticipated Peer Effects: An Application to COVID-19 Vaccinations

Last registered on April 12, 2021

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Anticipated Peer Effects: An Application to COVID-19 Vaccinations
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0007437
Initial registration date
April 07, 2021

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 08, 2021, 6:17 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
April 12, 2021, 3:45 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
LMU Munich

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
LMU Munich
PI Affiliation
LMU Munich

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2021-04-08
End date
2022-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
We run an online field experiment in Germany designed to empirically study anticipated peer effects in the context of the decision to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Anticipated peer effects capture the idea that people want to lead by (good) example when having the opportunity to influence others. Our goal is to isolate anticipated from other behavioral motives operating once individuals’ behavior is made observable to others such as social image effects. To this end, we will analyse individuals' stated and revealed willingness to register for and later receive a COVID-19 vaccination.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Esguerra, Emilio, Leonhard Vollmer and Johannes Wimmer. 2021. "Anticipated Peer Effects: An Application to COVID-19 Vaccinations." AEA RCT Registry. April 12. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.7437
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
We run an online survey experiment in Germany. We recruit participants through a professional survey company in German states that at the moment of the intervention allow for an online pre-registration for COVID-19 vaccination appointments. Our experimental intervention groups participants into pairs and varies whether information on willingness to get vaccinated is conveyed to the partner.
Intervention Start Date
2021-04-08
Intervention End Date
2021-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
(1) Stated willingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19
(2) Stated willingness to register for a vaccination appointment
(3) Revealed measure of actually registering for a vaccination appointment
(4) Revealed measure of actually getting vaccinated in follow-up survey
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
(1) Stated willingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19
Survey participants are asked whether they are willing to get vaccinated against COVID-19

(2) Stated willingness to register for a vaccination appointment
Survey participants are asked whether they are willing to register for a vaccination appointment via the online registration platform of their state of residence right now with the option of answering yes or no.

(3) Revealed measure of actually registering for vaccination appointment
We will give participants the option to register for the vaccination online via the online registration platform of their state of residence which we see as a revealed preference measure of vaccination willingness. To this end, subjects will have the option to click on a link redirecting them to the official vaccination registration portal. Participants willing to do this fill out the registration form outside of our survey and receive an automatically generated registration confirmation mail. Once participants return to the survey, we ask them to type in the subject line and email address from which they received the confirmation email. We do so to obtain verifiable proof of their registration while upholding anonymity.

(4) Revealed measure of actually getting vaccinated in follow-up survey
In a follow-up survey several weeks later to which all subjects that have participated the main experiment are invited, we will ask respondents to state whether they have been vaccinated and, in case they do, to receive verifiable information, ask them to report the name and batch number of their COVID-19 vaccine (or the last vaccine they received in case they report not having been vaccinated against COVID-19) as stated in their official vaccination certificate.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Same decision of both partners in a pair
Belief about same decision of both partners in a pair (only Senders)
Belief about own decision influencing decision of partner (only Senders)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We group subjects into pairs where they take different roles: individuals either act as Senders or Receivers. The decision of Senders whether to get vaccinated is (potentially) made observable to Receivers but not vice versa. We assign pairs of subjects into different experimental conditions: In condition (A), Senders’ decisions are not observable, while in condition (B) Senders’ decisions are observable to their partner. We hypothesize that the observability of Senders’ decisions may simultaneously give rise to anticipated peer effects and social image effects. In order to isolate anticipated peer effects from social image effects, we hold the latter constant across Senders whose behavior can be observed by their Receiver and, at the same time, induce random variation in Senders’ beliefs about the strength of the potential peer effect they can exert on their Receivers. To induce variation in this belief among Senders, we further randomize the timing when the Receiver is informed about the Sender’s decision in condition B. In condition (B1), Senders are informed that their decision is only reported to Receivers after he has already decided. In condition (B2), Senders are informed that their Receivers learn about their decision before the latter get to decide for themselves. For further details on the experimental design, please refer to our pre-analysis plan.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
Randomization takes place at the individual level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
4,000 individuals
Sample size: planned number of observations
4,000 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Expected treatment group sizes:
(A): 667
(B1): 1,667
(B2): 1,667
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Ethics Commission, Department of Economics, University of Munich
IRB Approval Date
2021-03-31
IRB Approval Number
2021-01
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information