Do teacher assessments and track recommendations discriminate against Roma minority students? – A randomized experiment among Hungarian primary school teachers

Last registered on June 18, 2021

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Do teacher assessments and track recommendations discriminate against Roma minority students? – A randomized experiment among Hungarian primary school teachers
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0007838
Initial registration date
June 18, 2021

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 18, 2021, 12:53 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
June 18, 2021, 12:57 PM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Institute of Economics,Budapest, Hungary; Centre for Labour Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
PI Affiliation
Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Institute of Economics,Budapest, Hungary; Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest Hungary

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2021-06-18
End date
2021-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Conducting a randomized experiment, we examine whether discrimination exists among teachers against Roma minority students in Hungary. Our target population consists of teachers who teach Hungarian grammar and literature or mathematics in the 5th-8th grades of Hungarian primary schools. The experiment will be carried out online. We will contact every Hungarian primary school with an invitation letter sent to the schools’ central e-mail address that is publicly available. The first 200 mathematics and 200 Hungarian and grammar school teachers who are willing to participate can take part in the experiment. Teachers will be asked to evaluate six mathematics/Hungarian tests and recommend a secondary school track to the fictive student. Students’ names on the tests will be randomized (Roma male, Roma female, non-Roma male, non-Roma female names). We hypothesize that tests with Roma names receive lower evaluations and track recommendations on average than tests with non-Roma names. We test our hypotheses estimating linear regression models with teacher and test fixed effects. We preregister the analysis plan before having any endline data.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Kisfalusi, Dorottya, Zoltán Hermann and Tamás Keller. 2021. "Do teacher assessments and track recommendations discriminate against Roma minority students? – A randomized experiment among Hungarian primary school teachers." AEA RCT Registry. June 18. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.7838-2.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Our experimental manipulation consists of a random manipulation of students’ names (Roma male, Roma female, non-Roma male, non-Roma female names) on mathematics/Hungarian tests evaluated by primary school teachers.
Intervention Start Date
2021-06-18
Intervention End Date
2021-09-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. total points assigned to the test by the teachers 2. track recommendations by the teachers
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
We have two primary outcome variables:
1. The total points assigned to the test, which ranges from 0 to 30 in the case of both subjects. The mathematics test consists of 6 exercises with the following maximum points: 5,4,4,5,6,6. The literature test consists of 5 exercises with the following maximum points: 8,4,4,4,10.
2. The recommended secondary school track (1 - vocational, 2 – secondary vocational, 3 – secondary grammar), recoded into a dummy variable (1 – vocational, 0 – secondary vocational or secondary grammar) for the confirmatory analysis.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
grade assigned to the test by the teachers
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
The grade assigned to the test (integer between 1 and 5)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Teachers have four tasks in the experiment:
1. They evaluate six mathematics or Hungarian grammar and literature tests on a 30-point scale first. Students’ names on the tests will be fictive and randomly assigned (Roma male, Roma female, non-Roma male, non-Roma female names).
2. Teachers recommend a grade based on the evaluation of the test on the 5-grade scale used in the Hungarian educational system (1 = fail, 2 = pass, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = good, 5 = excellent).
3. They recommend a secondary school track to the students whose tests they evaluated. (1 – vocational school, 2 – secondary vocational school, 3 – secondary grammar school). Besides the points and grades assigned by the teacher in the given subject, we will provide an additional information: fictive points the student received for their test in the other subject.
4. Teachers are asked to fill out a questionnaire focusing on background information, seating arrangements in the class, and tracking in school.
Experimental Design Details
Recruitment of schools

We will contact every Hungarian primary school with an invitation letter sent to the schools’ central e-mail address that is publicly available. The invitation letter will be addressed to the school principal. Principals will be asked to forward the e-mail to the Hungarian and mathematics teachers in the school.
The first 200 Hungarian and 200 mathematics teachers who are willing to participate can take part in the online experiment. The data collection, however, will be closed at 30 September 2021 even if a lower number of teachers participate until then. The number of teachers who are allowed to participate in the experiment will be limited to five mathematics and five Hungarian teachers per school. Teachers will receive 10.000 HUF (equivalent to 34.4 USD) for participation. Thus, our target population consists of teachers who teach Hungarian grammar and literature or mathematics in the 5th-8th grades of Hungarian primary schools.

The experimental procedure

We have constructed mathematics and Hungarian tests from exercises used in prior admission tests to secondary education. The mathematics test consists of six exercises. The Hungarian grammar and literature test consists of five exercises, including a 10-12 sentence-long essay on a gender-neutral topic (advantages and disadvantages of written tests and oral presentations in school).
We have constructed six-six different solutions of the mathematics and Hungarian test, respectively. We pre-tested these solutions among teachers not included in the final sample. The pre-test verified sufficient variation in teachers’ evaluations, which shows that teachers assessed the same test version differently, which leaves space for teachers’ subjective evaluations.
We created four name sets. Two name sets contained 2 Roma (1 male, 1 female) and 4 non-Roma (2 male, 2 female) names. The other two name sets contained 4 Roma (2 male, 2 female) and 2 non-Roma (1 male, 1 female) names.
Roma family names were selected based on a study that investigated which family names are most often perceived as Roma by the Hungarian population (Váradi, 2012). Roma first names were selected based on the frequency of first names of Roma students participating in two recent data collections among primary school students in ethnically mixed primary schools in Hungary. Non-Roma family names were selected from the most frequent family names in Hungary, but less frequent names that are typically perceived as non-Roma family names (e.g., ending with a “y”) were also used. Non-Roma first names were selected from the ten most frequent female and ten most frequent male names given in 2006.
We created test packages for mathematics and Hungarian tests separately. From the six test versions and four name sets, eight different packages were created because eight is the lowest number of combinations to ensure that every test is presented with an assigned Roma and non-Roma male and female name by an equal frequency. Each package contained all the six tests and one of the name sets. Within one package, one test is always assigned to one particular name. In the eight packages, every test is assigned two times to a Roma male name, two times to a non-Roma male name, two times to a Roma female name, and two times to a non-Roma female name.
We will assign the packages randomly to the teachers. Within the packages, teachers will see the tests in a random order.

Teachers’ tasks in the experiment

Teachers have four tasks in the experiment:
1. They evaluate mathematics or Hungarian grammar and literature tests on a 30-point scale first. Students’ names on the tests will be fictive and randomly assigned. Teachers are not provided with a solution because we want to avoid influencing teachers’ grading practices.
2. Teachers recommend a grade based on the evaluation of the test on the 5-grade scale used in the Hungarian educational system (1 = fail, 2 = pass, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = good, 5 = excellent).
3. They recommend a secondary school track to the students whose tests they evaluated. (1 – vocational school, 2 – secondary vocational school, 3 – secondary grammar school). Besides the points and grades assigned by the teacher in the given subject, we will provide an additional information: fictive points the student received for their test in the other subject.
4. Teachers are asked to fill out a questionnaire focusing on background information, seating arrangements in the class, and tracking in school.

Experimental manipulation

Our experimental manipulation consists of a random manipulation of students’ names on the tests. Since this is a light-touch manipulation, our design makes sure to communicate students’ name many times to teachers:
1. Students’ name stands on the sheet before the first exercise with students’ handwriting (e.g., “Kolompár Ramóna”).
2. Students’ name appears before and after each exercise (e.g., “You now see the first exercise of Kolompár Ramóna’s test.” / “Ön most Kolompár Ramóna dolgozatának első feladatát látja.” “How many points do you give to the first exercise of Kolompár Ramóna’s test from a maximum of 5 points?” / “Hány pontra értékeli Kolompár Ramóna dolgozatának 1. feladatát a maximális 5 pontból?”).
3. After teachers evaluated all exercises, all students’ names appear again in one table. Teachers have to indicate the grade corresponding to each test in this table.
4. After teachers graded the tests, all names appear again in a new table, in which teachers have to recommend a secondary school track.

Randomization Method
The experimental procedure employs randomization at different levels:
1. Based on the value of a random number, teachers will receive a random test package from the eight different test packages.
2. Within the assigned package, teachers will see the tests in a random order (based on the value of a random number).
3. Before deciding on the track recommendations, we communicate teachers the fictive points that students received for a test in another school subject (e.g., if the teacher evaluated the Hungarian test, we communicate the students’ fictive achievement on the math test, and vice-versa). This procedure is based on randomization in which we randomly choose one out of the six possible functions below with 1/6 probablity:
i. points given by the teacher – 6 point;
ii. points given by the teacher – 4.5 point;
iii. points given by the teacher – 3 point;
iv. points given by the teacher + 3 point;
v. points given by the teacher + 4.5 point;
vi. points given by the teacher + 6 point
Randomization Unit
The experimental procedure employs randomization at different levels:
1. Based on the value of a random number, teachers will receive a random test package from the eight different test packages.
2. Within the assigned package, teachers will see the tests in a random order (based on the value of a random number).
3. Before deciding on the track recommendations, we communicate teachers the fictive points that students received for a test in another school subject (e.g., if the teacher evaluated the Hungarian test, we communicate the students’ fictive achievement on the math test, and vice-versa). This procedure is based on randomization in which we randomly choose one out of the six possible functions below with 1/6 probablity:
i. points given by the teacher – 6 point;
ii. points given by the teacher – 4.5 point;
iii. points given by the teacher – 3 point;
iv. points given by the teacher + 3 point;
v. points given by the teacher + 4.5 point;
vi. points given by the teacher + 6 point
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
we do not have clusters
Sample size: planned number of observations
Having a single-level trial and expecting 400 teachers, each of them grading six tests, our planned number of observations will be 2,400 tests.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Students' names will be randomized on the tests. The planned number of observations is 2,400 tests, half of them (1200) is expected to be assigned to Roma names, half of them (1200) is expected to be assigned to non-Roma names.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
We calculate the power using the Optimal Design program (Spybrook, 2010). Having a single-level trial and expecting 400 teachers, each of them grading six tests, our analytical sample will contain 2,400 tests. Our most conservative p-value is 0.025. Using a one-sided t-test, the minimum detectable effect size (MDE) obtained by our design is 0.11. Since prior research found an effect size of 0.12 comparing Turkish and native German (Sprietsma, 2013; Wenz & Hoenig, 2020), our design is well-powered to detect a similar-sized treatment effect among Roma and non-Roma Hungarians.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Research Ethics Committee, Centre for Social Sciences, ELKH
IRB Approval Date
2021-06-17
IRB Approval Number
N/A
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials