Back to History Current Version

Intrahousehold Belief Disagreement and Portfolio Choice

Last registered on July 01, 2021

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Intrahousehold Belief Disagreement and Portfolio Choice
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0007897
Initial registration date
June 30, 2021

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 01, 2021, 8:30 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of South Carolina

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2021-07-12
End date
2021-08-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
In this trial, I investigate the impact of intrahousehold belief disagreement on household portfolio choice. Going beyond what would be possible in a typical observational study, the experimental methodology allows causal identification of any effects of disagreement between spouses over future stock market returns. Furthermore, I investigate the role of information in the intrahousehold financial decision-making process.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Ke, Da. 2021. "Intrahousehold Belief Disagreement and Portfolio Choice." AEA RCT Registry. July 01. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.7897-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2021-07-12
Intervention End Date
2021-08-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Both the extensive (a binary variable) and intensive (a continuous variable between 0 and 1) margins of stock market participation.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
I recruit subjects on Amazon's Mechanical Turk (mTurk), an online platform that enables researchers to carry out survey experiments.
Experimental Design Details
At the start of the survey, I will ask six demographic questions to restrict my sample to married individuals aged between 25 and 64.

In the first part of the survey, I will ask subjects how they think about the stock market. Specifically, I will ask them about their expected stock market returns over the next 12 months, and the realized returns of the stock market in 2020 as well as in the first half of 2021. For a random subsample of subjects, I will then provide them with information about the recent performance of the stock market and ask them again about their expected stock market returns over the next 12 months.

In the second part of the survey, I will ask all subjects to imagine a scenario where they have $10,000 in a risk-free savings account that pays 1% of interest per year. I will randomize them into three disagreement conditions: (i) with spouse having the same stock market expectation; (ii) with spouse having a more optimistic stock market expectation; and (iii) with spouse having a more pessimistic stock market participation. I will then ask all subjects to make the decision for their family on how much, if any, they would take out of the savings account to buy and hold a stock market index for a year.

For my analysis, I will first examine whether disagreement in stock market expectations between spouses is reflected in household portfolio choice. In particular, I hypothesize that everything else equal, individual are more (less) likely to participate in the stock market if their spouse is more optimistic (pessimistic) about future stock returns, in both the extensive and intensive margins.

I will then investigate the role of information in the intrahousehold financial decision-making process. In particular, I will test whether the impact of intrahousehold belief disagreement becomes weaker if the decision maker has more information about the stock market.

I will also examine heterogeneity by gender. For example, women might incorporate more of their husband's expectation in their decision-making process. Similarly, information about the stock market might play a more important role for women.
Randomization Method
Qualtrics will randomize respondents into one of the two information conditions as well as one of the three disagreement conditions.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
3,000 married individuals aged between 25 and 64.
Sample size: planned number of observations
3,000 married individuals aged between 25 and 64.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Approximately 500 subjects in each of the 3 x 2 (i.e., disagreement x information) condition, totaling 3,000 individuals. Given the uncertainty of the number of married workers aged between 25 and 64 available on mTurk, I plan to recruit subjects every weekday from 9 am to 5 pm (Eastern time) starting from July 12. 2021 (i.e., the first Monday after the July 4th long weekend) till the end of August 2021. The recruiting process will end when the sample size reaches 3,000 or on August 31, 2021, whichever is earlier.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
The University of South Carolina Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2021-05-10
IRB Approval Number
Pro00108570
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials