Refreshing iv cannulation skills using mental imagery in medical students: Rater-blinded three-arm intervention

Last registered on August 11, 2021

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Refreshing iv cannulation skills using mental imagery in medical students: Rater-blinded three-arm intervention
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0008043
Initial registration date
August 08, 2021

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
August 11, 2021, 5:42 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region
Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Inselspital, Bern University Hospital

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2021-01-01
End date
2021-10-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Background and Goal of Study:
Mental imagery has long been used to successfully improve top athletes’ performance during e.g. the Olympics. More recently, this educational strategy has also been used to learn surgical skills. Only a few studies describe the use of mental imagery in anesthesia and in undergraduate medical education. This study investigates the effectiveness of mental imagery compared to written instructions respectively to hands-on training in part-task trainers in maintaining the skills of intravenous cannulation on a part task trainer in first-year medical students.

Materials and Methods: We performed a single-center, rater-blinded randomized controlled trial. Students attended a compulsory 4h- instructor-led intravenous cannulation course six month before the trial. After ethics committee waiver but with written informed consent, first-year medical students were randomly assigned to one of three different six-minutes tutorials on intravenous cannulation six months after the i.v. cannulation course. Each group consisted either of self-learning tutorial based on written instructions, a hands-on iv cannulation tutorial on a manikin, or a tutorial with a mental imagery audioguide session.
The student´s performance was assessed with the use of a 15-item standardized checklist in a six-minute Objective Structured Clinical Examination station for intravenous cannulation. Assuming an alpha error of 0.01, and an effect size of a Cohen’s f of 0.305 with an aimed power of 0.80, our sample size resulted in a minimum of 156 students. We performed descriptive analysis of the data and a one-way ANOVA. An a priori probability of less than 0,05 was considered to be statistically significant. All data were analysed using SPSS v.27.

Results and Discussion: In the 309 students participating, we did not find differences in the performance between the three groups and the pass mark for the OSCE station. The internal consistency of station items was 0.691. The mental imagery group was as successful as both other groups. With the same outcome, mental imagery and written instruction have the better effort-return ratio compared to resource intensive hands-on training in part-task trainers.

Conclusion: Simple and short interventions with mental imagery and written instructions have been shown equal effective as hands-on exercises for refreshing a simple but important procedural skill in medical students.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Berger, Joana. 2021. "Refreshing iv cannulation skills using mental imagery in medical students: Rater-blinded three-arm intervention." AEA RCT Registry. August 11. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.8043-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2021-04-28
Intervention End Date
2021-05-06

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
OSCE 1st Year Assessment Marking for the IV cannulation station
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
previous experience in healthcare, relatives working in the healthcare system, number of previous attempts in IV cannulation
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Study Design:
We carried out a three-armed, rater-blinded randomized trial. Six months after their initial standard IV cannulation teaching, medical students were randomly assigned to 3 groups, using a block randomization software (www.sealedenvelope.com):
1) Group A: 8 min. standard refresher (kinesthetic group, with Part-task trainer only): Students had an allotted time to practice in the model, similarly to what had occurred in the course sessions. A supervising tutor was present in the room and offered concurrent feedback. All materials used during the course sessions were available.
2) Group B: 8 min. self-learning tutorial. Students randomized to this intervention practiced the IV cannulation technique alone, with the aid of a laminated instruction sheet (Appendix 1). Students in this group had all materials used during the course session at their disposal.
3) Group C: 8 min. Tutorial with guided Mental Imagery rehearsal of the competence (audio-guide only). Students listened to a Mental Imagery audio script of the procedure while lying down on a lounger. No iv cannulation materials are available.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
medical students were randomly assigned to 3 groups, using a block randomization software (www.sealedenvelope.com)
Randomization Unit
Block randomisation of 9 individuals
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Sample size calculation:
The required sample size was calculated using an a priori power analysis with G*Power V.3.1.16 Assuming an effect size (f2=0.305) for a one way analysis of variance with three groups (α=0.01, 1-β=0.80), we found that the minimum required sample size for three groups was n=156. To compensate for 20% of non-responders, we aimed for 180 participants.
Sample size: planned number of observations
300 students
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
we found that the minimum required sample size for three groups was n=156 (52 for Standard Refresher; 52 Mental Imagery Intervention; 52 Control group)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Assuming an effect size (f2=0.305) for a one way analysis of variance with three groups (α=0.01, 1-β=0.80), we found that the minimum required sample size for three groups was n=156. To compensate for 20% of non-responders, we aimed for 180 participants.
Supporting Documents and Materials

Documents

Document Name
Project Synopsis
Document Type
proposal
Document Description
Project Synopsis
File
Project Synopsis

MD5: c3da9933f84b446b7adc733e21b87f80

SHA1: d65478e2835e5a573f983420c71a95b55f6d69cf

Uploaded At: August 08, 2021

Document Name
IRB Approval
Document Type
irb_protocol
Document Description
IRB Approval
File
IRB Approval

MD5: b8e0fcf8a84201fff6ff1ec30aa13826

SHA1: e3e51db914c54383cfec88199bcbf733f3c582e9

Uploaded At: August 08, 2021

IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Berner Kantonale Ethikkomission für die Forschung
IRB Approval Date
2021-01-26
IRB Approval Number
2021-00096

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials