Training Jobseekers to Fill Understaffed Jobs: An Experimental Study on Information Barriers

Last registered on November 10, 2021

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Training Jobseekers to Fill Understaffed Jobs: An Experimental Study on Information Barriers
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0008313
Initial registration date
October 12, 2021

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 15, 2021, 1:01 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
November 10, 2021, 4:07 AM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Erasmus University Rotterdam

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2021-10-11
End date
2024-10-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study investigates the role of information frictions in explaining why jobseekers do not fill understaffed jobs. To do so, we design a low-cost informational intervention in cooperation with a Public Employment Service in Belgium. The intervention aims at addressing potential information frictions faced by jobseekers when making decisions about training. Specifically, the intervention consists in communicating, to a random subset of recent UI recipients, information on the advantages of following a training (and searching for a job) in a shortage occupation. We then study whether directly providing this information to jobseekers by email has an impact on their likelihood of following a training in (and ultimately entering) a shortage occupation.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Leduc, Elisabeth and Ilan Tojerow. 2021. "Training Jobseekers to Fill Understaffed Jobs: An Experimental Study on Information Barriers." AEA RCT Registry. November 10. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.8313-1.1
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The Walloon Public Employment Service encourages jobseekers to follow trainings in shortage occupations, for free and while remaining eligible to UI benefits. Yet, these trainings are chronically undersubscribed. Our intervention consists in an informational outreach about these training opportunities and the advantages of enrolling in them. The aim is to determine whether information frictions about the trainings and related advantages could (partly) explain why jobseekers do not enrol in shortage occupation trainings.
Intervention (Hidden)
In most developed countries, a large number of unemployed individuals coexist along numerous job postings for which no appropriate candidate can be found. Such jobs are typically referred to as shortage or bottleneck occupations – i.e., jobs that employers find particularly difficult to fill. In theory, skill shortages should not last in the long run as jobseekers should learn about job opportunities on the labour market and, either apply for these jobs directly, or get the appropriate training to do so. Yet, skill shortages typically do persist over time (McGrath, 2020).
One reason why this might occur could be that jobseekers are not perfectly informed about job or training opportunities in shortage occupations. In addition, they might not be aware of the advantages of following professional trainings that would allow them to enter such jobs. Following a growing body of evidence demonstrating that UI recipients face a number of information barriers when making decisions about their job search strategies (e.g., Barr and Turner, 2018; Spinnewijn, 2015; Belot, 2019; Mbih, 2020), we thus study the role of information frictions in explaining why jobseekers do not fill understaffed jobs.
Specifically, we design a low-cost informational intervention in cooperation with the Walloon (one of Belgium’s three regions) Public Employment Service that aims at reducing information frictions in order to nudge jobseekers into understaffed jobs. The randomized experiment addresses potential information frictions about the occupations that yield the greatest job finding probabilities as well as the advantages of following trainings to enter these jobs. To do so, we send information about the existence of shortage occupations to a random subset of jobseekers, as well as information about the benefits of enrolling in trainings in an understaffed occupation.
Our study builds on the nudging literature (e.g., Hoxby and Turner, 2015; Chetty and Saez, 2013) and assesses the extent to which the persistence of shortage occupations and the effectiveness of active labour market programs are influenced by information frictions. It is inspired by and adds to an emerging body of literature analysing the consequences of information provision in a variety of economic applications, including job search and labor supply (Belot et al., 2019; Altmann et al., 2018; Chetty and Saez, 2013), and education and training (Balaban and Conway, 2020; Bonilla-Mejia et al., 2019; Barr and Turner, 2018; Jensen, 2010; Hastings and Weinstein, 2008). Our experiment is particularly close to Mbih (2020), Belot et al. (2019), Altmann et al. (2018) and Barr et al. (2018) and contributes to this strand of the literature by focusing on labour market shortages specifically, and combining information about the labour market and training opportunities for the unemployed to improve the likelihood that jobseekers re-enter the labour market.
Intervention Start Date
2021-10-11
Intervention End Date
2021-11-11

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Starting a training (for a shortage occupation or not); Finishing a training (for a shortage occupation or not); Entering employment (in a shortage occupation or not).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Signing up to an information session for a training; Signing up on the waiting list to follow a training (for a shortage occupation or not); Exiting the Unemployment Insurance; Time on Unemployment Insurance; Perceptions about the extent to which focusing their job search on shortage occupations is a good technique to increase their chances of finding a job; Perceptions about the extent to which following trainings is a good technique to increase one's chances of finding a job; Intent on following a training in the coming year; Perceptions about the support offered by the PES to follow a training.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The evaluation will rely on a randomized experiment in which the Public Employment Service (PES) will send emails to all individuals who were registered as UI recipients for at least one day between July and September 2021. An email will be sent to both control and treated individuals. The control group will receive an email inviting them to fill in a satisfaction survey about their experience with the PES, as is customary for the PES to do at the end of each quarter. The treatment group will receive the same email, augmented by information on shortage occupations and related training opportunities (and advantages of following these trainings). To measure the effects of the program, we will collect administrative data on training and employment from all study participants each year for at least two years after the time that the emails are sent.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization will be conducted based on the last number of the identification number of jobseekers. The random allocation to treatment and control group is done by the researchers and the PES does not intervene in this procedure.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
Between 50,000 and 60,000, depending on the number of people who register at the unemployment insurance between July and September 2021.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Between 25,000 and 30,000 individuals in control group and treatment group respectively (approximately half of included jobseekers in each arm)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
1.4 percentage point; proportional effect will depend on the base level, which is unknown at this point.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials