Moral universalism as a signal

Last registered on May 26, 2022

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Moral universalism as a signal
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0009369
Initial registration date
May 06, 2022

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
May 09, 2022, 8:22 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
May 26, 2022, 3:09 PM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Harvard University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2022-05-13
End date
2022-05-27
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
In this study we wish to explore the role of social signaling concerns in people's displayed moral universalism (the extent to which people display the same level of altruism toward in-group and out-group members). We use an online survey experiment to show that universalism is malleable to the presence and composition of one's audience.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Raux, Raphael. 2022. "Moral universalism as a signal." AEA RCT Registry. May 26. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.9369
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention changes the presence and composition of subject's audience as they take a universalism decision. Meaning: the subject's universalism decision can either be made public or not to another subject, and this subject can either be an in-group or out-group member.
Intervention Start Date
2022-05-13
Intervention End Date
2022-05-27

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The main outcome is the moral universalism decision: being given $1 to split between an in-group and out-group person, what fraction does the subject choose to give to the out-group person. Universalism is increasing in this fraction, and reaches its maximum with a 50-50 split. The main hypothesis is twofold: a) the public treatments will have a higher degree of displayed universalism than the private treatments; b) the public out-group treatment will have a higher degree of universalism than the public in-group treatment.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Subjects ("splitters") are matched with an "audience" member (another randomly-drawn subject), with whom they play a prisoner's dilemma game at the end of the survey. This audience can either be an in-group (fellow participant living in the U.S.) or out-group (fellow participant living anywhere else in the world) member.
Before playing the game, subjects ("splitters") are made to take a universalism decision (following Enke et al. 2020). This decision is either made public to the audience member, or kept private. Subjects have full knowledge of the intervention and the structure of the experiment.
There are therefore 4 treatment arms (public in-group; public out-group; private in-group; private out-group).
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Individual level for the 4 treatments. Subjects are also assigned to either the "splitters" or "audience" group, depending on which survey they see on the online platform.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
2 clusters: the "splitters" group and the "audience" group.
There are different surveys for "splitters" and "audiences", so conditional on taking part in a survey, the individual's cluster is already determined: subjects are then assigned randomly to one of the 4 treatment arms.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Around 800 "splitters", and around 160 "audiences", for a total of around 960 subjects. Each audience member is matched with 5 splitters. A little bit more than 960 subjects might be recruited to account for inattentive responses. Update: due to a large number of low-quality (inattentive or rushed) answers, especially in the two "public" treatment arms, an extra 600 splitters are recruited (along with an extra 120 audiences), so as to obtain around 200 high-quality responses per treatment. This put the total number of subjects to around 1680.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Each treatment arm will have around 200 "splitters" and 40 "audiences". There are 4 treatment arms.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Harvard - Committee on the Use of Human Subjects
IRB Approval Date
2022-05-05
IRB Approval Number
IRB22-0585

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials