Back to History Current Version

Mislearning from Silence and Misperceived Social Norms

Last registered on October 17, 2022

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Mislearning from Silence and Misperceived Social Norms
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0009505
Initial registration date
October 05, 2022

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 17, 2022, 3:56 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Harvard University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of California, Berkeley

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2022-10-01
End date
2023-01-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The study aims to understand how silence, interacting with social norms around holding specific views, shape political discourse. Specifically, we hypothesize that individuals who hold socially acceptable views are more likely to vocalize their views while those who hold socially sanctioned views are more likely to stay silent. If people are not sufficiently sophisticated about selection into expression or silence, this will lead to misperceptions about the distribution of political views, which in turn affects political choices of political expression and action. Taken together, this can lead to self-reinforcing loops of political expression and action in equilibrium. We propose a field experiment on college campuses to test whether drawing attention to the silent majority shift perceived social norms and political discourse in equilibrium.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Ho, Yuen and Yihong Huang. 2022. "Mislearning from Silence and Misperceived Social Norms." AEA RCT Registry. October 17. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.9505-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2022-10-01
Intervention End Date
2023-01-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
We will recruit college students as participants and the key outcome variables include:
1. private beliefs and second-order beliefs on the a set of socioeconomic and political topics
2. public expression of views in group chats.
3. willingness to take certain political expression actions (signing a petition and donating to a charitable cause)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We will post a short description of our study on Facebook and invite U.S. college students to participate in our study. We will explicitly state up front that the experiment includes discussion of socioeconomic and political topics, some of which may be sensitive. The main experiment will be conducted online in the following steps:
1. Baseline survey: We will recruit 500 participants. First, we will elicit students’ private beliefs on a set of socioeconomic and political topics, some of which are politically sensitive. Students can choose to answer “yes”/“no” and can also provide a one-sentence explanation of their beliefs. Students will also be incentivized to guess how other students privately answer each topic. We will also collect demographic data. All information collected in the survey will be kept private.
2. Randomly split participants into two subsamples of 100 and 400 people respectively. The 100 participants first choose whether to post their opinions publicly on an online message forum created by us on Slack (or zoom rooms). As admins of the those group chats, we will control display settings, such as hiding participant emails and editing participant’s full name and display name so that they are uniform.
3. Public expression (100 participants): the 100 participants will be asked the same topics asked in the baseline survey and each respondent can choose to answer publicly “yes”, “no”, or skip the question. They can also choose to provide explanations of their beliefs.
4. Randomize into information treatments: For the remaining 400 participants, we will randomize participants into one of two information treatments where we provide summary statistics about the public expression of the 100 participants.
5. Follow-up survey: After the information treatment, we will elicit students’ private beliefs on the same set of socioeconomic and political topics. We will also elicit second-order beliefs within their specific groups.
6. Randomization into new discussion groups: Based on the information treatment assignments, we will randomize participants into two groups of all control individuals and all treatment individuals.
7. Public Expression (400 participants): In these two groups with all control or all treatment individuals, students will again be asked the same topics. Participants will make public expression decisions in two rounds. In each round, half of the participants can choose to answer publicly “yes”, “no” or skip the question and provide explanations for their beliefs, and the other half will act as “observers”.
8. Endline survey (actions): After the public expressions and information treatments, we will ask all respondents whether they are willing to take certain political expression actions, such as signing a petition or donating to a charitable cause.
Experimental Design Details
We will post a short description of our study on Facebook and invite U.S. college students to participate in our study. We will explicitly state up front that the experiment includes discussion of socioeconomic and political topics, some of which may be sensitive. The main experiment will be conducted online in the following steps
1. Baseline survey: We will recruit 500 participants. First, we will elicit students’ private beliefs on a set of socioeconomic and political topics, some of which are politically sensitive. Students can choose to answer “yes”/“no” and can also provide a one-sentence explanation of their beliefs. Students will also be incentivized to guess how other students privately answer each topic. We will also collect demographic data, including gender, ethnicity, age, major, and self-identified political affiliation, and personally identifiable information, specifically full name, email address, and profile picture. All information collected in the survey will be kept private and confidential and only the two researchers will have access to the personally identifiable information provided in the survey.
2. Randomly split participants into two subsamples of 100 and 400 people respectively. The 100 participants first choose whether to post their opinions publicly on an online message forum created by us on Slack. As admin of the Slack group, we will control display settings, such as hiding participant emails so that they are not publicly displayed and editing participant’s full name and display name so that they are uniform (e.g. all participants will use their actual full name as their user name and display name as well as the provided profile photo in the survey as their profile photo).
3. Public expression (Round 1): the 100 participants will be asked a subset of the socioeconomic and political topics asked in the baseline survey and each respondent can choose to answer publicly “yes”, “no”, or skip the question and can also choose to provide explanations of their beliefs via publicly posted comments within the Slack group. Respondents’ full names and profile pictures will be posted alongside their messages if they choose to publicly express their opinions. Participants will only have 10 minutes to post their comments in the Slack group, to limit actual back-and-forth online conversations between participants.
4. Randomize into information treatments: For the remaining 400 participants, we will randomize participants into one of two information treatments:
a. Control: Provide information that summarizes the public expression of the 100 participants. For example, suppose that among 100 participants, 30 publicly answered “yes,” 20 publicly answered “no,” and 50 remained silent on a certain topic. We will show the control group a summary data visualization (such as a pie chart) that 30 respondents publicly posted “yes” and 20 respondents posted “no” in answer to the question.
b. Treatment: Provide information that draws attention to the fraction of people who remained silent during the group chats. Take the same example where among 100 participants, 30 publicly answered “yes,” 20 publicly answered “no,” and 50 remained silent on a certain topic. For the Silence Treatment group, we will show a summary data visualization that 30 respondents publicly posted “yes,” 20 respondents posted “no,” and 50 respondents remained silent in answer to the question.
5. Follow-up survey: After the information treatment, we will elicit students’ private beliefs on the same set of socioeconomic and political topics from the baseline survey. We will also elicit second-order beliefs by incentivizing accurate guesses about the belief distribution of other participants within their specific groups.
6. Randomization into new discussion groups: Based on the information treatment assignments, we will randomize participants into two groups of all control individuals and all treatment individuals.
7. Public Expression (Round 2): In these two groups with all control or all treatment individuals, students will again be asked a set of socioeconomic and political topics. Participants will make public expression decisions in two rounds. In each round, half of the participants can choose to answer publicly “yes”, “no” or skip the question and provide explanations for their beliefs via publicly posted comments, and the other half will act as “observers”. In this way, each participant expresses their opinions only once and we will have minimum experimenter demand effect.
8. Endline survey (actions): After the public expressions and information treatments, we will ask all respondents whether they are willing to take certain political expression actions, such as signing a petition or donating to a charitable cause.
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
The randomization will be done at the individual level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
We plan to recruit 500 college students.
Sample size: planned number of observations
500
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
We will have 200 students in the control group and 200 students in the treatment group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Harvard IRB
IRB Approval Date
2022-09-13
IRB Approval Number
IRB22-0757

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials