Evaluating interventions to promote gender equity in Economics postgraduate programs

Last registered on October 18, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Evaluating interventions to promote gender equity in Economics postgraduate programs
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014519
Initial registration date
October 09, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 18, 2024, 4:47 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Prtoria

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
NWU
PI Affiliation
University of Pretoria
PI Affiliation
Stellenbosch University

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-07-18
End date
2025-06-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Female representation in the Economics profession remains disproportionately low, with women making up only 35% of academic staff in South African university departments. This underrepresentation is often attributed to the "leaky pipeline," where women exit the field at higher rates from undergraduate studies through to professorship. While most research on this issue has focused on Global North contexts, less is known about the dynamics in the Global South. This study examines two hypotheses: (1) that students lack awareness of the diverse career opportunities available in Economics, and (2) that exposure to female economists as role models could increase female students' interest in the field. To investigate, we conducted focus groups to explore female students' career interests and then implemented a randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving approximately 1,000 students across five South African universities. Students were randomly assigned to either a treatment group, which viewed video interviews with female economists discussing their careers, or a control group, which watched interviews with health experts providing wellness advice. The study assesses the impact of the intervention on students’ aspirations in Economics by analyzing two outcome variables: a revealed outcome—the number of students applying for postgraduate studies in Economics—and stated outcomes based on students' agreement with various statements regarding their interest in Economics, collected at baseline and endline surveys. The study could improve our understanding why female students disproportionately exit Economics from undergraduate to postgraduate levels in South Africa.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Claassen, Carike et al. 2024. "Evaluating interventions to promote gender equity in Economics postgraduate programs." AEA RCT Registry. October 18. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14519-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Students were randomly assigned to one of two groups on an individual basis. Over three rounds, each group received a set of video interviews to watch. The control group viewed interviews with health experts discussing topics such as maintaining a healthy diet and the importance of regular exercise—information that, while useful, was unrelated to the study’s main outcome. In contrast, the treatment group watched interviews with economists from diverse sectors, including academia, non-profits, the private sector, and a multilateral organization. These economists were selected based on criteria identified in focus groups, where female participants expressed interest in fields like development economics, behavioral economics, and environmental economics.

After watching each video, students in both groups were asked two questions to confirm they had engaged with the content. Following this, they received information about applying to BCom Economics Honours programs at their respective universities. Additionally, students were given an open-ended question to reflect on the video and indicate whether it influenced their perception of Economics. All videos were delivered before the application deadlines for the BCom Economics Honours courses.

In the final round, students completed an endline survey, which mirrored the baseline survey but included additional questions to assess spillover effects and verify participation in the RCT. Although the treatment group viewed videos featuring three different economists, the endline survey was designed to help disentangle which specific aspects of the intervention had the most significant impact on students' perceptions.
Intervention Start Date
2024-08-08
Intervention End Date
2025-04-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Willingness to pursue a career in Economics
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
We asses the impact of the treatment on students' career aspirations in Economics by considering a revealed outcome variable and stated outcome variables. The revealed outcome variable is the number of students that apply for postgraduate studies in Economics from the targeted undergraduate group. The stated outcome variable is how much student agree reportedly agree with various statements about Economics (e.g. "I like Economics", "I want to pursue a career in Economics", "I want to pursue further studies in Economics") asked at baseline and endline surveys.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The target population for the randomized controlled trial consisted of all students at three universities in South Africa enrolled in final-year Economics courses, which are prerequisites to continue with postgraduate studies in South Africa. To encourage participation, we introduced the project during the first lecture of each course, where students were informed about the study's objectives, similar to the content of the informed consent form. To further boost engagement, students were entered into a lucky draw for each survey completed and video watched.

The RCT was conducted over five stages. In the first stage, students completed a baseline survey, which collected demographic information, their plans for the following year (e.g., further study or employment), and their perceptions and preferences regarding Economics. Students were also asked to rate their agreement with statements related to their interest in Economics, such as "I like Economics," "I want to pursue a career in Economics," "I intend to pursue further studies in Economics," and "Economics is equally open to men and women."

After the baseline survey, students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. During the following three rounds, each group was shown a series of video interviews. The control group viewed interviews with health experts who provided advice on topics such as maintaining a healthy diet and the importance of exercise—content unrelated to the study's outcome variables. In contrast, the treatment group watched interviews with economists from various fields, including academia, non-profits, the private sector, and multilateral organizations.

To ensure engagement, students in both groups answered two questions after watching each video. They were also provided with information on applying to postgraduate Economics programs at their universities. Additionally, students were asked an open-ended question about their thoughts on the video and whether it changed their perception of Economics. All videos were sent out before the application deadlines for the postgraduate Economics courses.

In the final round, students completed an endline survey that mirrored the baseline survey but included additional questions to detect any spillover effects and confirm participation in the RCT. Although students in the treatment group were exposed to three different economists, the endline survey aimed to disentangle the specific aspects of the intervention that had the most significant impact on students' perceptions.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization was conducted using a stratified method. Initially, students with known demographic data—such as gender and economics grades—were randomized to ensure no significant differences between the treatment and control groups. Demographic data was available for all students who completed the baseline survey, as well as for students from one of the participating universities, which provided access to student records. Due to ethical clearance and university policies, demographic data could not be obtained for all universities. Students with no demographic data available were randomized separately. Randomization was carried out using the "split sample" command in Stata.
Randomization Unit
Individual randomisation of students
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Three universities in South Africa takes part in the RCT. One of the universities has three campuses, meaning the RCT is conducted on five university campuses in South Africa.
Sample size: planned number of observations
The RCT will be conducted in 2024 (n=700) and repeated in 2025 (n=900), giving us total sample size of about1600.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
800 students
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Pretoria, Faculty of Economics and Management Science
IRB Approval Date
2024-04-15
IRB Approval Number
EMS247/23
IRB Name
North-West University Research Data Gatekeeper Committee
IRB Approval Date
2024-05-28
IRB Approval Number
NWU-GK-24-233