Monetary Incentives for Cyclists: evidence from a RCT in São Paulo

Last registered on August 08, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Monetary Incentives for Cyclists: evidence from a RCT in São Paulo
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016519
Initial registration date
August 06, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
August 08, 2025, 7:16 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
FGV EAESP
PI Affiliation
USP - FEA
PI Affiliation
USP - IME

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2025-07-01
End date
2025-10-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This randomized controlled trial evaluates the impact of monetary incentives on bicycle commuting in São Paulo, Brazil. Over a four-week period, participants are assigned weekly to receive different payments per kilometer cycled, with trip tracking conducted via a custom-developed mobile application.
Before the intervention began (August 4th), participants completed a baseline survey capturing sociodemographic information and existing cycling habits. To be eligible for the trial, individuals were required to (i) complete the survey and (ii) register in the app. As part of the app setup, participants pre-selected up to five addresses corresponding to locations related to work or education. They could also register up to four public transport hubs to allow for multimodal commuting, integrating cycling with the use of public transportation. Only participants who completed both the baseline survey and app registration were included in the randomization process.
Based on baseline behavior, participants were categorized into two groups: (1) super cyclists, who already use bicycles for all of their daily trips; and (2) casual cyclists, who cycle occasionally and also use other modes of transport in their daily commutes. All eligible casual cyclists (n = 460) were included in the intervention and randomized weekly to receive either R$ 0.30 or R$ 0.60 per kilometer traveled by bicycle, capped at 8 kilometers per trip.
Super cyclists (n = 757) were more numerous than casual cyclists. Each week, 351 super cyclists were randomly assigned to receive R$ 0.30/km, while the remaining 406 receive no payment (R$ 0.00/km). The number of paid super cyclists was determined based on the remaining weekly budget after accounting for casual cyclist payments. Both groups were subject to weekly re-randomization to allow for intra-individual variation in treatment assignment.
All payments were delivered via credits on São Paulo’s public transportation smartcard system (Bilhete Único), with payments made weekly. The trial is designed to provide causal evidence on the responsiveness of cycling behavior to monetary incentives, including the relative effectiveness of different payment amounts and the potential for incentivized mode shift. The primary hypothesis is that paying individuals for each kilometer cycled increases the number of functional trips (for work or study) made by bicycle.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Alvarez, Luis et al. 2025. "Monetary Incentives for Cyclists: evidence from a RCT in São Paulo." AEA RCT Registry. August 08. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16519-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention consists of providing monetary incentives to individuals for commuting by bicycle. Participants receive a payment of either R$0.30 or R$0.60 per kilometer traveled by bike, with a cap of 8 kilometers per trip. Trips are tracked via a custom mobile app developed for the study, and participants receive weekly payments in the form of credits deposited directly onto their Bilhete Único (São Paulo’s public transport card). The intervention is designed to test whether financial incentives can increase the number of functional cycling trips, particularly those made for work or education purposes.
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2025-08-04
Intervention End Date
2025-08-29

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Number of trips made by bike in a week.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This is an individually randomized controlled trial conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, to evaluate the effect of monetary incentives on bicycle commuting. Participants were recruited via an online form and had to complete a baseline survey and register in a custom mobile app that tracks bicycle trips.
Participants were classified into two groups based on baseline cycling behavior. The group “casual cyclists” is composed of individuals who use bicycles occasionally, and to whom, the financial incentive can increase the number of weekly cycling trips overtaken. The second group, “super cyclists”, is composed of individuals who already use bicycles for all their trips, so we do not expect the financial incentive to change their behavior.
All casual cyclists (n = 460) were included in the intervention and randomly assigned each week to receive either R$0.30 or R$0.60 per kilometer traveled by bicycle, with payments capped at 8 km per trip.
Super cyclists (n = 757) were also randomized weekly: 351 participants were assigned to receive R$0.30/km, and 406 participants to receive R$0.00/km. The weekly number of paid super cyclists was determined based on remaining budget after the estimated cost of casual cyclists.
Randomization occurs weekly, allowing for within-subject variation over time. Participants are tracked using a GPS-based app. Eligible trips must start or end at up to five pre-registered work/study addresses or four public transport hubs.
Credits are transferred weekly to participants via São Paulo’s public transport card system (Bilhete Único). The number of cycling trips between pre-registered locations is measured at the weekly level, and is the outcome of interest.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer, using randomizr in R.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
0
Sample size: planned number of observations
460 + 757 = 1,217 individuals for four weeks, so 4868 observations in the final sample.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Casual cyclists (n = 460) and total amount received in the four weeks
R$ 0.3 = 31 individuals
R$ 0.375 = 110
R$ 0.45 = 179
R$ 0.525 = 108
R$ 0.6 = 32

Super cyclists (n = 757) and total amount received in the four weeks
R$ 0 = 53
R$ 0.075 = 226
R$ 0.15 = 285
R$ 0.225 = 164
R$ 0.3 = 29
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Comitê de Conformidade Ética em Pesquisa Envolvendo Seres Humanos da Fundação Getulio Vargas – CEPH/FGV
IRB Approval Date
2025-02-25
IRB Approval Number
P.004.2025

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials