Fertility Intentions, Maternity Allowance Policy, and the Role of Information Disclosure in Childbearing Decisions

Last registered on January 28, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Fertility Intentions, Maternity Allowance Policy, and the Role of Information Disclosure in Childbearing Decisions
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017731
Initial registration date
January 22, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
January 28, 2026, 7:31 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Department of Economics, Boston College
PI Affiliation
School of Economics and Management, Tongji University
PI Affiliation
National School of Development, Peking University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-02-02
End date
2026-06-02
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study employs a randomized controlled trial within the context of Shanghai’s Maternity Allowance Policy to examine intra‑household decision‑making. We begin with a preliminary survey measuring baseline fertility intentions and policy awareness, with attention to variation by gender. Eligible couples are then randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions: a control group with symmetric information between spouses, and two treatment groups featuring varying degrees of information asymmetry. By exogenously manipulating the distribution of policy information within couples, we observe subsequent spousal behavior in a simulated joint fertility decision task. The empirical analysis tests whether exclusive female access to policy information generates a bargaining‑power premium and reduces household fertility intentions. Heterogeneity analyses further examine whether these effects are amplified among couples with higher preference alignment, greater policy uncertainty, and lower household income.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Cao, Zhi et al. 2026. "Fertility Intentions, Maternity Allowance Policy, and the Role of Information Disclosure in Childbearing Decisions." AEA RCT Registry. January 28. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17731-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The preliminary survey does not involve any intervention; it collects background data via questionnaires.

The main trial involves a sequence of activities designed to examine how couples process information and make joint decisions. All participating couples first complete individual background surveys. They then engage with informational materials about the relevant policy, with the content and delivery varying by experimental condition to study different scenarios of information distribution. Following this, couples participate in a discussion aimed at reaching a mutual decision. Finally, each spouse completes a concluding individual survey.

To ensure ethical standards and participant welfare, all couples receive comprehensive and accurate policy information upon completing the study.
Intervention (Hidden)
The preliminary survey does not involve any intervention; it collects background data via questionnaires.

The main trial consists of five sequential stages. First, each spouse independently completes a baseline survey of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Second, all couples jointly receive standardized policy information: the control group and Treatment Group 1 review a core policy module, while Treatment Group 2 additionally receives a supplementary module with numerical subsidy examples, intended to narrow the dispersion of expected subsidy amounts. Third, in the control group, both spouses read the full policy; in Treatment Groups 1 and 2, only the wife receives the full policy module and may choose what, if anything, to disclose to her husband; the husband reads neutral sports news as a placebo. Fourth, couples then jointly discuss and must reach a consensus on near‑term childbearing intentions. Finally, each spouse individually completes a post‑experiment survey covering household characteristics and expectations. Wives in the treatment groups are also asked about the extent and manner of information shared.

After the experiment, all households receive a full policy information package to ensure an accurate understanding and prevent potential misunderstandings or household tensions.
Intervention Start Date
2026-02-02
Intervention End Date
2026-06-02

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
In the preliminary survey, core outcomes include each spouse’s individual fertility intention, their knowledge of the relevant policy’s specific provisions, and their stated willingness to share policy-related information within the household.

In the main trial, the primary outcome is the couple’s jointly stated decision—expressed as a binary choice or a probabilistic assessment—regarding whether to attempt to have a child in the near term, following their collaborative discussion.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
The heterogeneity analysis examines whether the treatment effects vary with several moderating variables: the degree of spousal preference alignment, the degree of policy uncertainty, and the level of household income.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study employs a two-phase design, comprising a preliminary survey and a randomized controlled trial, both administered via the certified online platform Credamo.

The preliminary survey targets individuals of childbearing age in Shanghai to assess baseline fertility intentions and policy awareness among those eligible for the relevant policy.

The main trial focuses on married or cohabiting couples of childbearing age in Shanghai. Each eligible couple is randomized into one of three study arms: Control, Treatment 1, or Treatment 2. These different conditions vary in how policy information is presented and shared between spouses. The core objective is to examine how the distribution of information within a couple influences their joint decision-making process regarding fertility. All participants engage in a sequence of survey modules and a structured joint discussion task. Following the experiment, every participating couple receives a complete and accurate information package about the relevant policy to ensure full understanding. The subsequent analysis explores how treatment effects vary with factors such as spousal preference alignment, policy uncertainty, and household income.
Experimental Design Details
This study employs a two-phase design, comprising a preliminary survey and a randomized controlled trial, both administered via the certified online platform Credamo.

The preliminary survey targets individuals of childbearing age in Shanghai to assess baseline fertility intentions and policy awareness among those eligible for the relevant policy.

The main trial focuses on married or cohabiting couples of childbearing age in Shanghai. Each eligible couple is randomized into one of three study arms: Control, Treatment 1, or Treatment 2. The control arm establishes a symmetric-information baseline where both spouses receive complete policy details. Treatment 1 creates a condition of high information asymmetry, while Treatment 2 introduces a condition of moderately high information asymmetry, designed to yield a narrower distribution of expected policy benefits.

The experimental procedure consists of five sequential stages. First, each spouse independently completes a baseline survey covering demographic, economic, and health characteristics. Second, couples jointly review policy information. The control arm and Treatment 1 review a core policy module, while Treatment 2 also reviews a supplementary module with numerical examples of subsidy calculations. Third, during an individual disclosure stage, information access diverges. In the control arm, both spouses read the full policy. In the two treatment arms, only the wife receives the full policy details and is permitted to disclose information at her discretion; husbands read neutral sports news as a placebo. Fourth, couples engage in a joint discussion to reach a consensus on near-term childbearing intentions. Finally, each spouse completes a post-experiment survey covering household economics and expectations, with wives in the treatment arms additionally reporting their information-sharing behavior.

Upon completion, all participating couples receive a comprehensive policy information package to ensure an accurate understanding and mitigate potential household tensions.

The subsequent analysis includes an examination of heterogeneity based on spousal preference alignment, policy uncertainty, and household income.
Randomization Method
The study is administered via Credamo, a certified online survey platform. Randomization is implemented automatically through the platform's built-in procedure, which uses computer-generated random numbers following eligibility verification.
Randomization Unit
Randomization in the preliminary survey is conducted at the individual level. In the main trial, the unit of randomization is the couple.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
The study aims to enroll approximately 400 participants (200 male and 200 female) in the preliminary survey. For the main randomized controlled trial, the target sample size is approximately 2,500 couples, resulting in approximately 5,000 individual observations.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
In the preliminary survey, there are no treatment arms. For the main trial, couples are randomized into three groups with an allocation ratio of 1 (Control) : 2 (Treatment 1) : 2 (Treatment 2). This yields a target sample of 500 couples in the control group, and 1,000 couples in each of the two treatment groups.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Peking University Biomedical Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2026-01-20
IRB Approval Number
2025239

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials